Table F43Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of traction

Author, yearRandomizationConcealed treatment allocationBaseline group similarityPatient blindedCare provider blindedOutcome assessor / Data analyst blindedCointerventions avoided or similarCompliance acceptable in all groupsAttrition reportedAttrition acceptableTiming of outcome assessment in all groups similiaIntention-to-treat analysisIs there a registered or published protocolAvoidance of selective outcomes reportingQuality Rating
Diab, 2012 and Diab, 2013YesYesYesNoNoNoYesYesYesYesYesUnclearYesYesFair
Moustafa, 2013YesYesYesNoUnclearUnclearYesYesYesYesYesYesUnclearUnclearFair
Prasad, 2013UnclearUnclearYesNoYesUnclearYesUnclearYesNoYesNoUnclearUnclearPoor

Please see Appendix C. Included Studies for full study references.

From: Appendix F, Quality Assessment

Cover of Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 169.
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.