NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
A Proof-of-Concept Case Study Integrating Publicly Available Information to Screen Candidates for Chemical Prioritization under TSCA [Internet]. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2021 Jun.
A Proof-of-Concept Case Study Integrating Publicly Available Information to Screen Candidates for Chemical Prioritization under TSCA [Internet].
Show details| Title: | A Proof-of-Concept Case Study Integrating Publicly Available Information to Screen Candidates for Chemical Prioritization under TSCA |
| Purpose/Objective: | Regulatory agencies world-wide are looking to efficiently integrate information on chemical substances in order to inform priorities for decisions and data requests. This document updates the long-term strategy described in the Working Approach and presents the Public Information Curation and Synthesis (PICS) approach that integrates publicly-available hazard, exposure, persistence, and bioaccumulation information for chemical substances. This approach is not designed to replace the prioritization process described in TSCA but aims to increase efficiency and focus expert review on substances that may have a greater potential for selection as a high- or low-priority candidate. |
| Product Completion Date (Projected): | 03/01/2021 |
| OMB Category: | Influential |
| Peer Review Leader: |
Rebecca Daniels email: daniels.rebecca@epa.gov |
| External Peer Review Mechanism: | Letter Review by Independent Subject Experts |
| Peer Review Expected to Begin: | 1st Quarter, Fiscal Year 2021 |
|
EPA’s Fiscal Years run from October to September. Quarters for Fiscal Year 2021: 1st: October - December, 2020 2nd: January - March, 2021 3rd: April - June, 2021 4th: July - September, 2021 |
| Was a deferral to peer review invoked? | No |
| Will an alternative peer review process be employed? | No |
| Number of Peer Reviewers | 4 to 10 |
| Primary Disciplines needed in the review: | Toxicology-General |
| Who will select the reviewers? | a Contractor |
| Will the public, including scientific or professional societies be asked to nominate peer reviewers? | No |
| Will public nominations be allowed through the Peer Review Agenda? | No |
| Will there be opportunity for public comment on the product? | No |
| Will the Agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? | No |
| Will the review be a panel, conducted in public? | No |
| Will public comments be allowed at the panel review? | No |
- PEER REVIEW PLAN - A Proof-of-Concept Case Study Integrating Publicly Available ...PEER REVIEW PLAN - A Proof-of-Concept Case Study Integrating Publicly Available Information to Screen Candidates for Chemical Prioritization under TSCA
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...