Achondrogenesis type 1B (ACG1B) is a perinatal-lethal disorder with death occurring prenatally or shortly after birth.
Suggestive Findings
ACG1B should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical and radiographic findings.
Clinical findings
Extremely short limbs with short fingers and toes and clubfeet
Hypoplasia of the thorax
Protuberant abdomen
Hydropic fetal appearance caused by the abundance of soft tissue relative to the short skeleton
Flat face with micrognathia
Short neck
Thickened soft tissue of the neck
Radiographic findings. While the degree of ossification generally depends on gestational age, variability can be observed between radiographs taken at similar gestational ages; thus, no single feature should be considered obligatory.
Disproportion between the nearly normal-sized skull and very short body length. The skull may have a normal appearance or be mildly abnormal (reduced ossification for age; lateral or superior extension of the orbits).
Total lack of ossification of the vertebral bodies or only rudimentary calcification of the center. The vertebral lateral pedicles are usually ossified.
Short and slightly thin (but usually not fractured) ribs
Iliac bone ossification limited to the upper part, giving a crescent-shaped, "paraglider-like" appearance on x-ray. The ischium is usually not ossified.
Shortening of the tubular bones such that no major axis can be recognized. Metaphyseal spurring gives the appearance of a "thorn apple" (or in hematologic terms, acanthocyte). The phalanges are poorly ossified and thus rarely identified on x-ray.
Only mildly abnormal clavicles (somewhat shortened but normally shaped and ossified) and scapulae (small with irregular contours) [
Superti-Furga 1996]
Establishing the Diagnosis
The diagnosis of ACG1B can be established in a proband with the characteristic clinical and radiographic findings described in Suggestive Findings and/or biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in SLC26A2 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).
Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variants" and "likely pathogenic variants" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and both can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this section is understood to include any likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of biallelic SLC26A2 variants of uncertain significance (or of one known SLC26A2 pathogenic variant and one SLC26A2 variant of uncertain significance) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic
testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype and/or clinical context.
Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other skeletal dysplasias are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).
Option 1
Single-gene
testing. Sequence analysis of SLC26A2 detects small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants. Typically, if only one or no variant is detected by the sequencing method used, the next step is to perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect exon and whole-gene deletions or duplications; however, to date such variants have not been identified as a cause of this disorder.
A
multigene panel that includes SLC26A2 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
Option 2
When the phenotype is not clearly distinguishable from other skeletal dysplasias, comprehensive
genomic
testing, which does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved, is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.
For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Achondrogenesis Type 1B
View in own window
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Detectable by Method |
---|
SLC26A2
| Sequence analysis 3 | >90% 4 |
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5 | None reported 6 |
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
- 4.
Sequence analysis identifies 90% of alleles in individuals with radiologic and histologic features of achondrogenesis type 1B [Rossi & Superti-Furga 2001].
- 5.
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.
- 6.
Data derived from the subscription-based professional view of Human Gene Mutation Database [Stenson et al 2020]
Other Testing
Histopathologic testing. In ACG1B, the histology of the cartilage shows a rarified cartilage matrix partially replaced by a larger number of cells. After hematoxylin-eosin staining, the matrix appears non-homogeneous with coarse collagen fibers. The fibers are denser around the chondrocytes, where they can form "collagen rings." After staining with cationic dyes (toluidine blue, alcian blue), which bind to the abundant polyanionic sulfated proteoglycans, normal cartilage matrix appears as a homogeneous deep blue or violet; in ACG1B, cartilage staining with these dyes is much less intense because of the defective sulfation of the proteoglycans.
Biochemical testing. The incorporation of sulfate into macromolecules can be studied in cultured chondrocytes and/or skin fibroblasts through double labeling with 3H-glycine and 35S-sodium sulfate. After incubation with these compounds and purification, the electrophoretic analysis of medium proteoglycans reveals a lack of sulfate incorporation [Superti-Furga 1994], which can be observed even in total macromolecules. The determination of sulfate uptake is possible but cumbersome and is not used for diagnostic purposes [Superti-Furga et al 1996a].
Note: It is often difficult to distinguish between the three different forms of achondrogenesis: ACG1A, ACG1B, and ACG2 (see Differential Diagnosis).