U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

, PhD and , MD, PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: ; Last Update: January 21, 2021.

Estimated reading time: 23 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders are characterized by early-onset epileptic encephalopathy (i.e., refractory seizures and cognitive slowing or regression associated with frequent ongoing epileptiform activity). Seizure onset is typically between ages six months and four years. Seizure types typically include drop attacks, myoclonus, and rapid onset of multiple seizure types associated with generalized spike-wave on EEG, atonic-myoclonic-absence seizures, and clinical photosensitivity. Intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders are common.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in CHD2 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Seizures should be managed by an experienced pediatric neurologist. At this time, no specific guidelines regarding choice of specific anti-seizure medications exist, as the best regimen for CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders is not yet established. Most Individuals remain refractory to treatment and require multiple anti-seizure medications. Support services for those with developmental delay, intellectual disability, and/or associated psychiatric/behavioral disorders.

Surveillance: At each visit assess for new seizures or change in seizures; evaluate developmental progress and educational needs; behavioral assessment for anxiety, attention, and aggressive or self-injurious behavior; assess family need for social work support and care coordination.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Because clinical photosensitivity may result in injuries due to the consequences of induced seizures, it is recommended that stimuli that may provoke seizures (e.g., intensely flickering lights) be avoided.

Genetic counseling.

CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders are autosomal dominant disorders typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant. If the CHD2 pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent, the risk to sibs is low but greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of parental germline mosaicism. Once the CHD2 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

Suggestive Findings

CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders should be suspected in individuals with the following:

  • Early-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (i.e., refractory seizures and cognitive slowing or regression associated with frequent ongoing epileptiform activity [Scheffer et al 2017]), particularly those with:
    • Seizure onset between ages six months and four years
    • Drop attacks and rapid onset of multiple seizure types associated with generalized spike-wave on EEG
    • Atonic-myoclonic-absence seizures (See Clinical Description.)
    • Clinical photosensitivity
    Note: Photic stimulation during an EEG may be a helpful diagnostic modality (even though not all individuals with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder and clinical photosensitivity show an EEG response to photic stimulation). However, the possible increased risk for photic-induced seizures in individuals with this disorder should be taken into account when obtaining an EEG with photic stimulation.
  • Intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders, particularly when epilepsy is also present

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in CHD2 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: Per ACMG variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variants" and "likely pathogenic variants" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and both can be used for clinical decision making. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this section is understood to include any likely pathogenic variants.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (multigene panel) or genomic testing (chromosomal microarray analysis [CMA] or comprehensive genomic sequencing).

Gene-targeted testing requires the clinician to determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing may not. Because the phenotypes of many genetic epileptic encephalopathies overlap, most children with CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder with epilepsy are diagnosed by the following recommended testing (a multigene panel or CMA) or testing to be considered (comprehensive genomic sequencing).

Recommended Testing

An epilepsy or intellectual disability multigene panel that includes CHD2 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (including CHD2) that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Testing to Consider

Comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene(s) are likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used and yields results similar to an intellectual disability multigene panel with the additional advantage that exome sequencing includes genes recently identified as causing intellectual disability whereas some multigene panels may not.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Resolution of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Many disorders that perturb regulators of epigenetic processes result in a very specific DNA methylation pattern that is common to all affected individuals with pathogenic variants in that gene [Aref-Eshghi et al 2020]. Identification of an "episignature" characteristic of CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders can be used to resolve VUS in CHD2.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Gene 1MethodProportion of Probands with a CHD2 Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method
CHD2 Sequence analysis 3129/139 (93%) 4
CMA 510/139 (7%) 6
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 7Unknown 8
1.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.

Data derived from author review of variants reported in the literature, large-scale cohort exome studies, and data from genetic testing companies [Author, personal communication]

5.

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (including CHD2) that cannot be detected by sequence analysis. The ability to determine the size of the deletion/duplication depends on the type of microarray used and the density of probes in the 15q26 region. CMA designs in current clinical use target the 15q26 region.

6.

Individuals with features of CHD2-related disorders who have deletions encompassing CHD2 (with or without deletion of RGMA) have been reported [Dhamija et al 2011, Capelli et al 2012, Chénier et al 2014, Courage et al 2014, Pinto et al 2014].

7.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

8.

No intragenic CHD2 multiexon deletions or duplications have been reported.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

To date 139 individuals with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder have been reported [Carvill et al 2013, Suls et al 2013, O'Roak et al 2014, Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Group 2015, Thomas et al 2015, Heyne et al 2018, Ko et al 2018, Truty et al 2019, Chen et al 2020].

A systematic single study of individuals with CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders has not yet been published. To date, epilepsy is a consistent feature across the phenotypic spectrum of CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders and most individuals reported have presented with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. However, as genetic testing becomes more widely available and less targeted (i.e., more genes are included in multigene panels) the phenotypic spectrum is evolving.

The most common clinical features of these individuals are described below.

Table 2.

Select Features of CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Feature% of Persons w/Feature
Seizures96% (108/113)
Developmental delay / Intellectual disability95% (81/85)
Autism spectrum disorder56% (39/70)

Seizures. The age of onset ranges from six months to 12 years; median seizure onset is 30 months (2.5 years).

Seizure onset, which is explosive in many children, is characterized by multiple daily myoclonic and absence seizures.

Although CHD2-related epilepsy has been compared to Dravet syndrome in at least one study, febrile seizures, which are characteristic of Dravet syndrome, have only been reported in 11 individuals with CHD2 variants [Carvill et al 2013, Suls et al 2013, Thomas et al 2015, Petersen et al 2018, Chen et al 2020].

A classic seizure type termed "atonic-myoclonic-absence seizure," a progressive seizure pattern comprising an abrupt head nod and atonia followed by a myoclonic absence phase and progression to a "ratchet-like" tonic abduction of the upper limbs, was observed in video footage of three children aged two to seven years. Seizures were brief (2-8 seconds) and awareness rapidly returned [Thomas et al 2015]. Many of the components of this seizure pattern have been described in other affected individuals; thus, future video monitoring and video EEG monitoring will be important in determining if this seizure pattern is a hallmark of CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders.

Clinical photosensitivity (i.e., seizures triggered by photic stimulation) is a distinguishing feature reported in a total of 80% (20/25) of individuals where it was specifically queried. A small number of individuals could self-induce seizures, suggesting an unusually strong degree of photosensitivity. In contrast, a photoparoxysmal response (an epileptiform EEG response to intermittent photic stimulation) has only been recorded in two affected individuals [Lund et al 2014, Thomas et al 2015, Trivisano et al 2015]. Of note, some individuals with a CHD2 pathogenic variant have a diagnosis of eyelid myoclonia with absences, a particularly photosensitive epilepsy syndrome [Galizia et al 2015].

Seizures are often refractory to currently available anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Only 13 of 33 affected individuals have been reported to be seizure free on ASM treatment for two to five years (see Management) [Thomas et al 2015, Chen et al 2020].

Psychomotor development prior to seizures can be delayed (n=20) but is often not reported and this feature requires further evaluation. When specifically reported in the literature, intellectual disability ranges from mild (in 7/15 individuals) to severe (8/15 individuals).

Behavior and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Autism spectrum disorder or autistic features have been reported in 56% (39/70) of individuals. Challenging behaviors, most often aggression, have been described, with three requiring medical treatment with risperidone [Thomas et al 2015]. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and psychosis have also been reported in a small number of individuals. There is also a single individual diagnosed with schizophrenia [Poisson et al 2020]. It is currently unclear to what extent a specific behavior phenotype is part of the phenotypic spectrum and this requires further investigation for management.

Neuroimaging. In some affected individuals MRI has shown atrophy that tends to be more posterior and can be progressive. In those with ataxia, cerebellar atrophy was more pronounced [Suls et al 2013, Thomas et al 2015].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

No genotype-phenotype correlation has been observed between the location/nature of the pathogenic variant and clinical outcome.

Penetrance

Penetrance for CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders is unknown but assumed to be complete. There are a small number of instances where the CHD2 variant is inherited from a presumably unaffected parent or a parent with a milder phenotype [Petersen et al 2018, Chen et al 2020]. In such instances it is important to evaluate the parent for somatic mosaicism.

Prevalence

The prevalence of CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders is not known.

A de novo CHD2 pathogenic variant was present in an estimated 1% of individuals included in cohorts with various developmental and epileptic encephalopathies [Allen et al 2013, Carvill et al 2013]. In another report of nearly 10,000 individuals referred for genetic testing using a comprehensive epilepsy panel, 0.25% of individuals has a CHD2 pathogenic variant identified [Truty et al 2019]. In individuals with a neurodevelopmental disorder that included epilepsy, CHD2 was the fourth most highly implicated gene [Heyne et al 2018].

In each of four studies of exome-based sequencing of hundreds to thousands of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders including intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders, one to three individuals with a de novo CHD2 pathogenic variant were identified [Neale et al 2012, Rauch et al 2012, O'Roak et al 2014, Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Group 2015].

Differential Diagnosis

Phenotypic features associated with CHD2 pathogenic variants are not sufficient to diagnose CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders.

For children with a phenotype consistent with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy, all genes known to be associated with epileptic encephalopathy (~90 have been identified; see OMIM Phenotypic Series) should be included in the differential diagnosis.

For children with intellectual disability and epilepsy, all genes associated with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (see OMIM Phenotypic Series), idiopathic generalized epilepsy (see OMIM Phenotypic Series), and generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (see OMIM Phenotypic Series) should be included in the differential diagnosis.

Management

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder, the evaluations summarized in Table 3 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 3.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
Neurologic Neurologic eval
EEG
  • To assess degree of epileptic encephalopathy
  • May lead to more focused use of ASMs
MRI
  • To differentiate genetic epilepsy from lesional epilepsy
  • May lead to intensified conservative treatment rather than presurgical work up
Development Developmental assessment
  • To incl motor, adaptive, cognitive, & speech/language eval
  • Eval for early intervention / special education
Psychiatric/
Behavioral
Neuropsychiatric evalFor persons age >12 mos: screening for behavior concerns incl sleep disturbances, ADHD, anxiety, aggression, &/or traits suggestive of ASD
Genetic
counseling
By genetics professionals 1To inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Family support
& resources
Assess need for:

ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; ASMs = anti-seizure medications; MOI = mode of inheritance

1.

Medical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, or certified advanced genetic nurse

Treatment of Manifestations

Table 4.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
Epilepsy Standardized treatment w/ASM by experienced neurologist
  • Many ASMs may be effective; none have been demonstrated effective specifically for this disorder. 1, 2
  • Education of parents/caregivers 3
Developmental delay / Intellectual disability See Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues.

ASMs = anti-seizure medications

1.

Most individuals remain refractory to treatment and require multiple ASMs.

2.

Although a ketogenic diet may be a treatment option, it was not effective in three affected individuals [Thomas et al 2015].

3.

Education of parents/caregivers regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for children diagnosed with epilepsy, see Epilepsy Foundation Toolbox.

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • IEP services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • Special education law requires that children participating in an IPE be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible, when and where appropriate.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Motor Dysfunction

Gross motor dysfunction. Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility and to reduce the risk for later-onset orthopedic complications. Consider use of durable medical equipment and positioning devices as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).

Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.

Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.

Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development.

Social/Behavioral Concerns

Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.

Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, when necessary.

Concerns about serious aggressive or destructive behavior can be addressed by a pediatric psychiatrist.

Surveillance

Table 5.

Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
Neurologic Monitor those w/seizures as clinically indicated & assess for new-onset seizures.At each visit
Development Monitor developmental progress & educational needs.
Psychiatric/
Behavioral
Assess behavior for anxiety, attention, & aggressive or self-injurious behavior.
Family/
Community
Assess family need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing, other local resources) & care coordination.

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Because clinical photosensitivity may result in injuries due to the consequences of induced seizures, the following are recommended:

  • Avoid flickering lights that may provoke seizures.
  • Advise affected individuals and families that exposure to intensely flickering lights may provoke seizures including eyelid myoclonias, absence seizures, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Of note, most televisions do not transmit in the frequency range that is particularly provocative.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders are autosomal dominant disorders typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • Almost all individuals diagnosed with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant.
  • In rare families, individuals diagnosed with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder have the disorder as the result of a CHD2 pathogenic variant inherited from a parent. For example:
    • A child with a severe presentation of CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder inherited a CHD2 pathogenic variant from her heterozygous, less severely affected mother [Petersen et al 2018]. Her mother had seizures as a child (well controlled with anti-seizure medications) and neuropsychiatric features (including bipolar disorder, ADHD, language delays, and dyslexia) but no learning difficulties throughout childhood [Petersen et al 2018].
    • A child with epilepsy and myoclonic seizures inherited a splice variant from his apparently unaffected heterozygous father [Chen et al 2020].
  • Molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of the proband to confirm their genetic status and to allow reliable recurrence risk counseling.
  • If the pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent, the following possibilities should be considered:
    • The proband has a de novo pathogenic variant. Note: A pathogenic variant is reported as "de novo" if: (1) the pathogenic variant found in the proband is not detected in parental DNA; and (2) parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity. If parental identity testing is not performed, the variant is reported as "assumed de novo" [Richards et al 2015].
    • The proband inherited a pathogenic variant from a parent with germline (or somatic and germline) mosaicism. Presumed parental germline mosaicism was reported in a family with unaffected parents and sib recurrence [Lebrun et al 2017]. Note: Testing of parental leukocyte DNA may not detect all instances of somatic mosaicism.
  • The family history of an individual diagnosed with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder may appear to be negative because of failure to recognize the disorder in family members. Therefore, an apparently negative family history cannot be confirmed unless molecular genetic testing has demonstrated that neither parent is heterozygous for the pathogenic variant identified in the proband.

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the genetic status of the proband's parents.

  • If a parent of the proband is affected and/or is known to have the pathogenic variant identified in the proband, the risk to the sibs of inheriting the pathogenic variant is 50%.
  • If the proband has a known CHD2 pathogenic variant that cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the recurrence risk to sibs is slightly greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of parental germline mosaicism [Lebrun et al 2017].
  • If the parents have not been tested for the CHD2 pathogenic variant but are clinically unaffected, the risk to the sibs of a proband appears to be low. However, sibs of a proband with clinically unaffected parents are still presumed to be at increased risk for a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder because of the possibility of parental germline mosaicism [Lebrun et al 2017, Myers et al 2018].

Offspring of a proband. Each child of an individual with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder has a 50% chance of inheriting the CHD2 pathogenic variant.

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the status of the proband's parents: if a parent has the CHD2 pathogenic variant, the parent's family members may be at risk.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected or at risk of having a child with a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder.

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the CHD2 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for a CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorder are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

  • Coalition to Cure CHD2
  • American Epilepsy Society
  • Autism Society
    Phone: 800-328-8476
    Email: info@autism-society.org
  • Canadian Epilepsy Alliance
    Canada
    Phone: 1-866-EPILEPSY (1-866-374-5377)
  • Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (CURE)
  • Epilepsy Foundation
    Phone: 800-332-1000; 866-748-8008
  • Simons Searchlight Registry
    Simons Searchlight aims to further the understanding of rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.
    Phone: 855-329-5638
    Fax: 570-214-7327
    Email: coordinator@simonssearchlight.org

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Genes and Databases

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for CHD2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders (View All in OMIM)

602119CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA-BINDING PROTEIN 2; CHD2
615369DEVELOPMENTAL AND EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY 94; DEE94

Molecular Pathogenesis

CHD2 encodes the chromodomain DNA helicase binding protein 2. CHD2 and additional members of this family of proteins are responsible for remodeling chromatin, which controls the three-dimensional architecture of the genome and gene expression. The protein consists of two chromodomains and a putative DNA binding domain; these domains are known or hypothesized to bind DNA [Marfella & Imbalzano 2007, Liu et al 2015]. The ATP-helicase and DEDX-helicase domain are known in other family members to remodel chromatin using the energy of ATP hydrolysis [Marfella & Imbalzano 2007, Bouazoune & Kingston 2012].

The overwhelming majority of CHD2 pathogenic variants lead to either truncation of the protein or loss of gene expression by whole-gene deletion. The pathogenic missense variants cluster in the functional domains and likely impair the ability of CHD2 to either bind to DNA targets and/or remodel chromatin. Collectively this suggests that CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders result from haploinsufficiency of CHD2.

To date the majority of individuals with a CHD2 pathogenic variant have a brain-restricted phenotype, suggesting a unique role for CHD2 in the human brain. The function of CHD2 in the human brain is not known. Complete CHD2 loss in a human stem cell model resulted in defects in the development of inhibitory interneurons and altered expression of genes important in neurotransmission [Meganathan et al 2017]. A heterozygous Chd2 loss mouse showed deficits in neuronal development including reduced number of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons and severe impairments in long-term memory. These animals did not exhibit seizures [Kim et al 2018].

Mechanism of disease causation. The majority of pathogenic variants lead to truncation of CHD2. The few reported de novo missense pathogenic variants occur in the highly conserved DNA-binding or helicase domains and likely hinder the ability of CHD2 to remodel chromatin. CHD2 pathogenic variants are likely all loss of function, resulting in CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders due to haploinsufficiency of CHD2.

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

The Epilepsiome: A knowledge base for genes related to human epilepsies:
CHD2 – this is what you need to know in 2015

Mefford Laboratory
St Jude Children’s Research Hospital
Center for Pediatric Neurological Disease Research
Department of Cell & Molecular Biology
262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 340
Memphis, TN 38105-3678

Carvill Laboratory
Northwestern University
303 E Chicago, Ward 9-183
Chicago, IL 60611
gemma.carvill@northwestern.edu
312-503-6187

Author History

Gemma Carvill, PhD (2015-present)
Ingo Helbig, MD; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (2015-2021)
Heather Mefford, MD, PhD (2015-present)

Revision History

  • 21 January 2021 (sw) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 10 December 2015 (bp) Review posted live
  • 14 May 2015 (hm/gc) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Allen AS, Berkovic SF, Cossette P, Delanty N, Dlugos D, Eichler EE, Epstein MP, Glauser T, Goldstein DB, Han Y, Heinzen EL, Hitomi Y, Howell KB, Johnson MR, Kuzniecky R, Lowenstein DH, Lu YF, Madou MR, Marson AG, Mefford HC, Esmaeeli Nieh S, O'Brien TJ, Ottman R, Petrovski S, Poduri A, Ruzzo EK, Scheffer IE, Sherr EH, Yuskaitis CJ, Abou-Khalil B, Alldredge BK, Bautista JF, Boro A, Cascino GD, Consalvo D, Crumrine P, Devinsky O, Fiol M, Fountain NB, French J, Friedman D, Geller EB, Glynn S, Haut SR, Hayward J, Helmers SL, Joshi S, Kanner A, Kirsch HE, Knowlton RC, Kossoff EH, Kuperman R, McGuire SM, Motika PV, Novotny EJ, Paolicchi JM, Parent JM, Park K, Shellhaas RA, Shih JJ, Singh R, Sirven J, Smith MC, Sullivan J, Lin Thio L, Venkat A, Vining EP, Von Allmen GK, Weisenberg JL, Widdess-Walsh P, Winawer MR. De novo mutations in epileptic encephalopathies. Nature. 2013;501:217–21. [PMC free article: PMC3773011] [PubMed: 23934111]
  • Aref-Eshghi E, Kerkhof J, Pedro VP, Groupe DI. France, Barat-Houari M, Ruiz-Pallares N, Andrau JC, Lacombe D, Van-Gils J, Fergelot P, Dubourg C, Cormier-Daire V, Rondeau S, Lecoquierre F, Saugier-Veber P, Nicolas G, Lesca G, Chatron N, Sanlaville D, Vitobello A, Faivre L, Thauvin-Robinet C, Laumonnier F, Raynaud M, Alders M, Mannens M, Henneman P, Hennekam RC, Velasco G, Francastel C, Ulveling D, Ciolfi A, Pizzi S, Tartaglia M, Heide S, Héron D, Mignot C, Keren B, Whalen S, Afenjar A, Bienvenu T, Campeau PM, Rousseau J, Levy MA, Brick L, Kozenko M, Balci TB, Siu VM, Stuart A, Kadour M, Masters J, Takano K, Kleefstra T, de Leeuw N, Field M, Shaw M, Gecz J, Ainsworth PJ, Lin H, Rodenhiser DI, Friez MJ, Tedder M, Lee JA, DuPont BR, Stevenson RE, Skinner SA, Schwartz CE, Genevieve D, Sadikovic B. Evaluation of DNA methylation episignatures for diagnosis and phenotype correlations in 42 Mendelian neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106:356–70. [PMC free article: PMC7058829] [PubMed: 32109418]
  • Bouazoune K, Kingston RE. Chromatin remodeling by the CHD7 protein is impaired by mutations that cause human developmental disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:19238–43. [PMC free article: PMC3511097] [PubMed: 23134727]
  • Capelli LP, Krepischi AC, Gurgel-Giannetti J, Mendes MF, Rodrigues T, Varela MC, Koiffmann CP, Rosenberg C. Deletion of the RMGA and CHD2 genes in a child with epilepsy and mental deficiency. Eur J Med Genet. 2012;55:132–4. [PubMed: 22178256]
  • Carvill GL, Heavin SB, Yendle SC, McMahon JM, O'Roak BJ, Cook J, Khan A, Dorschner MO, Weaver M, Calvert S, Malone S, Wallace G, Stanley T, Bye AM, Bleasel A, Howell KB, Kivity S, Mackay MT, Rodriguez-Casero V, Webster R, Korczyn A, Afawi Z, Zelnick N, Lerman-Sagie T, Lev D, Moller RS, Gill D, Andrade DM, Freeman JL, Sadleir LG, Shendure J, Berkovic SF, Scheffer IE, Mefford HC. Targeted resequencing in epileptic encephalopathies identifies de novo mutations in CHD2 and SYNGAP1. Nat Genet. 2013;45:825–30. [PMC free article: PMC3704157] [PubMed: 23708187]
  • Chen J, Zhang J, Liu A, Zhang L, Li H, Zeng Q, Yang Z, Yang X, Wu X, Zhang Y. CHD2-related epilepsy: novel mutations and new phenotypes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62:647–53. [PubMed: 31677157]
  • Chénier S, Yoon G, Argiropoulos B, Lauzon J, Laframboise R, Ahn JW, Ogilvie CM, Lionel AC, Marshall CR, Vaags AK, Hashemi B, Boisvert K, Mathonnet G, Tihy F, So J, Scherer SW, Lemyre E, Stavropoulos DJ. CHD2 haploinsufficiency is associated with developmental delay, intellectual disability, epilepsy and neurobehavioural problems. J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6:9. [PMC free article: PMC4022362] [PubMed: 24834135]
  • Courage C, Houge G, Gallati S, Schjelderup J, Rieubland C. 15q26.1 microdeletion encompassing only CHD2 and RGMA in two adults with moderate intellectual disability, epilepsy and truncal obesity. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:520–3. [PubMed: 24932903]
  • Dhamija R, Breningstall G, Wong-Kisiel L, Dolan M, Hirsch B, Wirrell E. Microdeletion of chromosome 15q26.1 in a child with intractable generalized epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2011;45:60–2. [PubMed: 21723464]
  • Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study Group. Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature. 2015;519:223–8. [PMC free article: PMC5955210] [PubMed: 25533962]
  • Galizia EC, Myers CT, Leu C, de Kovel CGF, Afrikanova T, Cordero-Maldonado ML, Martins TG, Jacmin M, Drury S, Chinthapalli VK, Muhle H, Pendziwiat M, Sander T, Ruppert A-K, Moller RS, Thiele H, Krause R, Schubert J, Lehesjoki A-E, Nurnberg P, Lerche H, Palotie A, Coppola A, Striano S, Del Gaudio L, Boustred C, Schneider AL, Lench N, Jocic-Jakubi B, Covanis A, Capovilla G, Veggotti P, Piccioli M, Parisi P, Cantonetti L, Sadleir LG, Mullen SA, Berkovic SF, Stephani U, Helbig I, Crawford AD, Esguerra CV, Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite DGA, Koeleman BPC, Mefford HC, Scheffer IE, Sisodiya SM. CHD2 variants are a risk factor for photosensitivity in epilepsy. Brain. 2015;138:1198–207. [PMC free article: PMC4407192] [PubMed: 25783594]
  • Heyne HO, Singh T, Stamberger H, Abou Jamra R, Caglayan H, Craiu D, De Jonghe P, Guerrini R, Helbig KL, Koeleman BPC, Kosmicki JA, Linnankivi T, May P, Muhle H, Møller RS, Neubauer BA, Palotie A, Pendziwiat M, Striano P, Tang S, Wu S. EuroEPINOMICS RES Consortium, Poduri A, Weber YG, Weckhuysen S, Sisodiya SM, Daly MJ, Helbig I, Lal D, Lemke JR. De novo variants in neurodevelopmental disorders with epilepsy. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1048–53. [PubMed: 29942082]
  • Kim YJ, Khoshkhoo S, Frankowski JC, Zhu B, Abbasi S, Lee S, Wu YE, Hunt RF. Chd2 is necessary for neural circuit development and long-term memory neuron. Neuron. 2018;100:1180–93.e6. [PMC free article: PMC6479120] [PubMed: 30344048]
  • Ko A, Youn SE, Kim SH, Lee JS, Kim S, Choi JR, Kim HD, Lee ST, Kang HC. Targeted gene panel and genotype-phenotype correlation in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;141:48–55. [PubMed: 29455050]
  • Lebrun N, Parent P, Gendras J, Billuart P, Poirier K, Bienvenu T. Autism spectrum disorder recurrence, resulting of germline mosaicism for a CHD2 gene missense variant. Clin Genet. 2017;92:669–70. [PubMed: 28960266]
  • Liu JC, Ferreira CG, Yusufzai T. Human CHD2 is a chromatin assembly ATPase regulated by its chromo- and DNA-binding domains. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:25–34. [PMC free article: PMC4281729] [PubMed: 25384982]
  • Lund C, Brodtkorb E, Oye AM, Rosby O, Selmer KK. CHD2 mutations in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;33:18–21. [PubMed: 24614520]
  • Marfella CG, Imbalzano AN. The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat Res. 2007;618:30–40. [PMC free article: PMC1899158] [PubMed: 17350655]
  • Meganathan K, Lewis EMA, Gontarz P, Liu S, Stanley EG, Elefanty AG, Huettner JE, Zhang B, Kroll KL. Regulatory networks specifying cortical interneurons from human embryonic stem cells reveal roles for CHD2 in interneuron development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E11180–9. [PMC free article: PMC5748186] [PubMed: 29229852]
  • Myers CT, Hollingsworth G, Muir AM, Schneider AL, Thuesmunn Z, Knupp A, King C, Lacroix A, Mehaffey MG, Berkovic SF, Carvill GL, Sadleir LG, Scheffer IE, Mefford HC. Parental mosaicism in "de novo" epileptic encephalopathies. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1646–8. [PMC free article: PMC5966016] [PubMed: 29694806]
  • Neale BM, Kou Y, Liu L, Ma'ayan A, Samocha KE, Sabo A, Lin CF, Stevens C, Wang LS, Makarov V, Polak P, Yoon S, Maguire J, Crawford EL, Campbell NG, Geller ET, Valladares O, Schafer C, Liu H, Zhao T, Cai G, Lihm J, Dannenfelser R, Jabado O, Peralta Z, Nagaswamy U, Muzny D, Reid JG, Newsham I, Wu Y, Lewis L, Han Y, Voight BF, Lim E, Rossin E, Kirby A, Flannick J, Fromer M, Shakir K, Fennell T, Garimella K, Banks E, Poplin R, Gabriel S, DePristo M, Wimbish JR, Boone BE, Levy SE, Betancur C, Sunyaev S, Boerwinkle E, Buxbaum JD, Cook EH Jr, Devlin B, Gibbs RA, Roeder K, Schellenberg GD, Sutcliffe JS, Daly MJ. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature. 2012;485:242–5. [PMC free article: PMC3613847] [PubMed: 22495311]
  • O'Roak BJ, Stessman HA, Boyle EA, Witherspoon KT, Martin B, Lee C, Vives L, Baker C, Hiatt JB, Nickerson DA, Bernier R, Shendure J, Eichler EE. Recurrent de novo mutations implicate novel genes underlying simplex autism risk. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5595. [PMC free article: PMC4249945] [PubMed: 25418537]
  • Petersen AK, Streff H, Tokita M, Bostwick BL. The first reported case of an inherited pathogenic CHD2 variant in a clinically affected mother and daughter. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:1667–9. [PubMed: 29740950]
  • Pinto D, Delaby E, Merico D, Barbosa M, Merikangas A, Klei L, Thiruvahindrapuram B, Xu X, Ziman R, Wang Z, Vorstman JA, Thompson A, Regan R, Pilorge M, Pellecchia G, Pagnamenta AT, Oliveira B, Marshall CR, Magalhaes TR, Lowe JK, Howe JL, Griswold AJ, Gilbert J, Duketis E, Dombroski BA, De Jonge MV, Cuccaro M, Crawford EL, Correia CT, Conroy J, Conceição IC, Chiocchetti AG, Casey JP, Cai G, Cabrol C, Bolshakova N, Bacchelli E, Anney R, Gallinger S, Cotterchio M, Casey G, Zwaigenbaum L, Wittemeyer K, Wing K, Wallace S, van Engeland H, Tryfon A, Thomson S, Soorya L, Rogé B, Roberts W, Poustka F, Mouga S, Minshew N, McInnes LA, McGrew SG, Lord C, Leboyer M, Le Couteur AS, Kolevzon A, Jiménez González P, Jacob S, Holt R, Guter S, Green J, Green A, Gillberg C, Fernandez BA, Duque F, Delorme R, Dawson G, Chaste P, Café C, Brennan S, Bourgeron T, Bolton PF, Bölte S, Bernier R, Baird G, Bailey AJ, Anagnostou E, Almeida J, Wijsman EM, Vieland VJ, Vicente AM, Schellenberg GD, Pericak-Vance M, Paterson AD, Parr JR, Oliveira G, Nurnberger JI, Monaco AP, Maestrini E, Klauck SM, Hakonarson H, Haines JL, Geschwind DH, Freitag CM, Folstein SE, Ennis S, Coon H, Battaglia A, Szatmari P, Sutcliffe JS, Hallmayer J, Gill M, Cook EH, Buxbaum JD, Devlin B, Gallagher L, Betancur C, Scherer SW. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:677–94. [PMC free article: PMC4067558] [PubMed: 24768552]
  • Poisson A, Chatron N, Labalme A, Fourneret P, Ville D, Mathieu ML, Sanlaville D, Demily C, Lesca G. Chromatin remodeling dysfunction extends the etiological spectrum of schizophrenia: a case report. BMC Med Genet. 2020;21:10. [PMC free article: PMC6950831] [PubMed: 31914951]
  • Rauch A, Wieczorek D, Graf E, Wieland T, Endele S, Schwarzmayr T, Albrecht B, Bartholdi D, Beygo J, Di Donato N, Dufke A, Cremer K, Hempel M, Horn D, Hoyer J, Joset P, Ropke A, Moog U, Riess A, Thiel CT, Tzschach A, Wiesener A, Wohlleber E, Zweier C, Ekici AB, Zink AM, Rump A, Meisinger C, Grallert H, Sticht H, Schenck A, Engels H, Rappold G, Schrock E, Wieacker P, Riess O, Meitinger T, Reis A, Strom TM. Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: an exome sequencing study. Lancet. 2012;380:1674–82. [PubMed: 23020937]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, Guilhoto L, Hirsch E, Jain S, Mathern GW, Moshé SL, Nordli DR, Perucca E, Tomson T, Wiebe S, Zhang YH, Zuberi SM. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:512–21. [PMC free article: PMC5386840] [PubMed: 28276062]
  • Suls A, Jaehn JA, Kecskes A, Weber Y, Weckhuysen S, Craiu DC, Siekierska A, Djemie T, Afrikanova T, Gormley P, von Spiczak S, Kluger G, Iliescu CM, Talvik T, Talvik I, Meral C, Caglayan HS, Giraldez BG, Serratosa J, Lemke JR, Hoffman-Zacharska D, Szczepanik E, Barisic N, Komarek V, Hjalgrim H, Moller RS, Linnankivi T, Dimova P, Striano P, Zara F, Marini C, Guerrini R, Depienne C, Baulac S, Kuhlenbaumer G, Crawford AD, Lehesjoki AE, de Witte PA, Palotie A, Lerche H, Esguerra CV, De Jonghe P, Helbig I. De novo loss-of-function mutations in CHD2 cause a fever-sensitive myoclonic epileptic encephalopathy sharing features with Dravet syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:967–75. [PMC free article: PMC3824114] [PubMed: 24207121]
  • Thomas RH, Zhang LM, Carvill GL, Archer JS, Heavin SB, Mandelstam SA, Craiu D, Berkovic SF, Gill DS, Mefford HC, Scheffer IE. CHD2 myoclonic encephalopathy is frequently associated with self-induced seizures. Neurology. 2015;84:951–8. [PMC free article: PMC4351660] [PubMed: 25672921]
  • Trivisano M, Striano P, Sartorelli J, Giordano L, Traverso M, Accorsi P, Cappelletti S, Claps DJ, Vigevano F, Zara F, Specchio N. CHD2 mutations are a rare cause of generalized epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;51:53–6. [PubMed: 26262932]
  • Truty R, Patil N, Sankar R, Sullivan J, Millichap J, Carvill G, Entezam A, Esplin ED, Fuller A, Hogue M, Johnson B, Khouzam A, Kobayashi Y, Lewis R, Nykamp K, Riethmaier D, Westbrook J, Zeman M, Nussbaum RL, Aradhya S. Possible precision medicine implications from genetic testing using combined detection of sequence and intragenic copy number variants in a large cohort with childhood epilepsy. Epilepsia Open. 2019;4:397–408. [PMC free article: PMC6698688] [PubMed: 31440721]
Copyright © 1993-2024, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2024 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: ude.wu@tssamda.

Bookshelf ID: NBK333201PMID: 26677509

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this page (486K)

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...