Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
Synonyms: Horan-Beighton Syndrome, OS-CS, AMER1-Related Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
Russell Gear, MBChB and Ravi Savarirayan, MBBS, MD, FRACP, ARCPA (Hon).
Author Information and AffiliationsInitial Posting: April 15, 2021; Last Revision: March 30, 2023.
Estimated reading time: 26 minutes
Summary
Clinical characteristics.
Most females with osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) present with macrocephaly and characteristic facial features (frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, depressed nasal bridge, and prominent jaw). Approximately half have associated features including orofacial clefting and hearing loss, and a minority have some degree of developmental delay (usually mild). Radiographic findings of cranial sclerosis, sclerosis of long bones, and metaphyseal striations (in combination with macrocephaly) can be considered pathognomonic.
Males can present with a mild or severe phenotype.
Mildly affected males have clinical features similar to affected females, including macrocephaly, characteristic facial features, orofacial clefting, hearing loss, and mild-to-moderate learning delays. Mildly affected males are more likely than females to have congenital or musculoskeletal anomalies. Radiographic findings include cranial sclerosis and sclerosis of the long bones; Metaphyseal striations are more common in males who are mosaic for an AMER1 pathogenic variant.
The severe phenotype manifests in males as a multiple-malformation syndrome, lethal in mid-to-late gestation, or in the neonatal period. Congenital malformations include skeletal defects (e.g., polysyndactyly, absent or hypoplastic fibulae), congenital heart disease, and brain, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal anomalies. Macrocephaly is not always present and longitudinal metaphyseal striations have not been observed in severely affected males, except for those who are mosaic for the AMER1 pathogenic variant.
Diagnosis/testing.
The diagnosis of OS-CS is established in a female proband with characteristic features and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in AMER1 identified by molecular genetic testing. The diagnosis of OS-CS is established in a male proband with characteristic features and a hemizygous pathogenic variant in AMER1 identified by molecular genetic testing.
Management.
Treatment: Scoliosis management per orthopedic surgeon; physiotherapy may be helpful for joint contractures; management of oral facial clefts per otolaryngologist; hearing loss is managed by audiology, speech and language therapy, and otolaryngology; vision loss management per ophthalmologist and neurosurgery for nerve compression as indicated; early intervention services and special education as indicated; standard treatments for cardiac, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal anomalies and Wilms tumor or other malignancy.
Surveillance: Annual clinical assessment for skeletal manifestations such as scoliosis, joint contractures, stress fractures, and persistent bone pain. Annual audiology and ophthalmology evaluations for evidence of cranial nerve compression due to sclerotic bone disorder. Consider abdominal ultrasound every three months until age seven years to screen for Wilms tumor.
Genetic counseling.
OS-CS is inherited in an X-linked manner. The risk to sibs of a male proband depends on the genetic status of the mother. The risk to sibs of a female proband depends on the genetic status of the mother and the father. If the mother of the proband has an AMER1 pathogenic variant, the chance of transmitting it in each pregnancy is 50%. If the father of the proband has an AMER1 pathogenic variant, it should be presumed he will transmit the AMER1 pathogenic variant to all his daughters and none of his sons (to date, paternal transmission has only been reported in mosaic fathers). Females who inherit an AMER1 pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will have variable manifestations of OS-CS. Males who inherit a pathogenic variant will be hemizygotes and will have variable manifestations ranging from mid-late gestation and neonatal lethality to the mild phenotype. Once the AMER1 pathogenic variant is identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.
Diagnosis
No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) have been published, however the combination of macrocephaly, cranial sclerosis, and longitudinal metaphyseal striations of the long bones are considered highly characteristic of this condition.
Suggestive Findings
OS-CS should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical and radiographic findings.
Females and Mosaic and/or Mildly Affected Males
Clinical findings
Characteristic facial features (e.g., frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, depressed nasal bridge, prominent jaw)
Macrocephaly and stature short for mid-parental height
Orofacial clefting
Hearing loss (conductive and sensorineural) and progressive hearing loss
Poor or reduced vision
Normal intellect or mild developmental delays
Radiographic findings
Sclerosis of the cranium and skull base
Sclerosis of lamellar and trabecular bones
Metaphyseal, longitudinal striations of the long bones and pelvis (Note: Metaphyseal striations are typically absent in mildly affected constitutional males but present in mosaic males.)
Fibular aplasia or hypoplasia
Small exostoses
Severely Affected Males
Clinical findings
Fetal or neonatal death
Macrocephaly (50%)
Orofacial clefting (cleft palate or cleft lip and palate)
Facial features (frontal bossing, hypertelorism, depressed nasal bridge, and micrognathia)
Multiple congenital malformations:
Skeletal anomalies (polysyndactyly, talipes)
Genitourinary anomalies (echogenic or enlarged kidneys, nephrogenic rests)
Gastrointestinal anomalies (omphalocele, intestinal malrotation)
Congenital heart disease (hypoplastic left or right heart, septal defects, patent ductus arteriosus)
Brain anomalies (ventriculomegaly, abnormal corpus callosum)
Imaging findings
Establishing the Diagnosis
Female proband. The diagnosis of OS-CS is established in a female proband with suggestive findings and can be confirmed with a heterozygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in AMER1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).
Male proband. The diagnosis of OS-CS is established in a male proband with suggestive findings and can be confirmed with a hemizygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in AMER1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).
Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variants" and "likely pathogenic variants" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and both can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this section is understood to include any likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of a heterozygous or hemizygous AMER1 variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing, chromosomal microarray analysis, multigene panel, and comprehensive
genomic testing:
Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of AMER1 is performed first to detect small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants. Note: Depending on the sequencing method used, single-exon, multiexon, or whole-gene deletions/duplications may not be detected. If no variant is detected by the sequencing method used, the next step is to perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect exon and whole-gene deletions or duplications.
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (including AMER1) that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.
A multigene panel that includes
AMER1 and other genes of interest (see
Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this
GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
For an introduction to multigene panels click
here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found
here.
When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other skeletal dysplasias, comprehensive
genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.
For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click
here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found
here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
View in own window
| Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method |
|---|
|
AMER1
| Sequence analysis 3 | ~75% 4 |
| Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5 | ~25% 4 |
| CMA 6 | See footnote 7. |
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
- 4.
Review of approximately 90 pathogenic variants in the published literature [Author, personal observation], correlation with smaller published case series [Jenkins et al 2009, Perdu et al 2011], and data derived from the subscription-based professional view of Human Gene Mutation Database [Stenson et al 2020]
- 5.
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.
- 6.
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) uses oligonucleotide or SNP arrays to detect genome-wide large deletions/duplications (including AMER1) that cannot be detected by sequence analysis. The ability to determine the size of the deletion/duplication depends on the type of microarray used and the density of probes in the Xq11.2 region. CMA designs in current clinical use target the Xq11.2 region.
- 7.
Several contiguous deletions including AMER1 have been reported in individuals with features of OS-CS [Chénier et al 2012, Herman et al 2013, Holman et al 2013]. Contiguous gene deletions that include AMER1 and neighboring genes ARHGEF9 and MTMR8 appear to cause OS-CS with intellectual disability in females. Deletions including AMER1 and ASB12 only are not reported to be associated with intellectual disability [Holman et al 2013].
Clinical Characteristics
Clinical Description
To date, approximately 90 individuals with a pathogenic variant in AMER1 have been reported in the medical literature [Jenkins et al 2009; Perdu et al 2011; Author, personal observation]. The following description of the phenotypic features associated with this condition is based on these reports.
Table 2.
Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis: Frequency of Select Features in Females and Mildly Affected Males
View in own window
| Feature | % of Persons w/Feature 1 | Comment |
|---|
| Cranial sclerosis | 100% | |
| Sclerosis of long bones | 100% | |
| Metaphyseal striations | ~95% | In females & mosaic males; not seen in constitutional males |
| Characteristic facial features | ~90% | Frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, depressed nasal bridge |
| Macrocephaly | ~80% | Absolute or relative macrocephaly |
| Orofacial clefting | ~50% | Cleft palate or cleft lip and palate |
| Hearing loss | ~50% | Conductive &/or sensorineural |
| Mild developmental delays | ~30% | Severe developmental delay is rare. |
| Congenital heart disease | ~25% | |
| Wilms tumor 2 | ~5% 3 | Additional malignancies reported: hepatoblastoma, adult-onset colorectal cancer, adult-onset ovarian cancer |
- 1.
Review of approximately 90 individuals reported with OS-CS and an AMER1 pathogenic variant
- 2.
Association with Wilms tumor (and possibly other cancers) is an emerging feature and a significant departure from what was previously understood about the disorder.
- 3.
Affected Females
Most females with osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) present with macrocephaly and characteristic facial features (frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, and a depressed nasal bridge). Approximately half have associated features including orofacial clefting and hearing loss, and a minority have some degree of developmental delay (usually mild). Radiographic findings of cranial sclerosis, sclerosis of long bones, and metaphyseal striations (in combination with macrocephaly) can be considered pathognomonic.
Cranial sclerosis. Observed on radiographs of the skull, most notably in the vault. It can be present at birth, and is typically progressive.
Sclerosis of the pelvis and long bones. Best observed on radiographs of the pelvis and diaphyses of the femora and humeri. It can be present at birth, and is typically progressive.
Metaphyseal striations. Best observed on radiographs of the pelvis, proximal and distal femora, proximal tibiae, and humeri. It can be present antenatally, but usually develops during childhood.
Characteristic facial features. Most commonly include frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, and a depressed nasal bridge. These features can be present at birth, and typically become more exaggerated with age, particularly frontal bossing.
Macrocephaly is usually of postnatal onset and is associated with cranial sclerosis. It is usually absolute (>+2.5 SD), but can be relative to height or weight.
Stature. Unlike in many other skeletal dysplasias, short stature is not commonly associated with OS-CS.
Orofacial clefting. Typically cleft hard palate; bifid uvula has also been observed.
Hearing loss. Both conductive and sensorineural hearing loss have been observed; hearing loss occurs in approximately 50% of females [
Jenkins et al 2009,
Perdu et al 2011].
Cranial nerve palsies. Rarely, compression of the optic nerve due to bony sclerosis can lead to vision loss, and facial palsies have been reported. This can be progressive, and typically occurs in late adolescence and early adulthood.
Congenital heart disease. Approximately 25% of females with OS-CS have a structural heart defect [
Jenkins et al 2009,
Perdu et al 2010]. Atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects, and patent ductus arteriosus are the most commonly described structural anomalies.
Association with cancer. An association of OS-CS with cancer is emerging in the literature. To date, cancer has only been reported in females with OS-CS, including four instances of pediatric-onset
Wilms tumor: one female with bilateral tumors [
Sperotto et al 2017,
Bach et al 2021], one with a pediatric-onset hepatoblastoma [
Fujita et al 2014], one with an adult-onset colorectal cancer [
Jenkins et al 2009], and one with adult-onset ovarian cancer [
Perdu et al 2010].
Affected Males
There appear to be two distinct phenotypes in males: mild and severe.
Mild phenotype. Mildly affected males have clinical features similar to affected females, including macrocephaly, characteristic facial features, orofacial clefting, hearing loss, and mild-to-moderate learning delays. Mildly affected males are more likely than females to have congenital or musculoskeletal anomalies. Males with the mild phenotype may have a mosaic or constitutional AMER1 pathogenic variant, each with distinct radiographic features. Shared radiographic findings include cranial sclerosis and sclerosis of the long bones, however metaphyseal striations are more common in mosaic males.
Cranial sclerosis and sclerosis of the pelvis and long bones. Best observed on radiographs of the skull, pelvis, femora, and humeri. Sclerosis appears to be more marked compared with females, possibly due to the hemizygous nature of the pathogenic variant in males.
Characteristic facial features most commonly include frontal bossing, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, and a depressed nasal bridge.
Macrocephaly is usually of postnatal onset and is associated with cranial sclerosis. It is usually absolute, (>+3 SD), but can be relative to height or weight.
Stature. Proportionate short stature of <‒2 SD is commonly associated with OS-CS in males [
Holman et al 2011].
Hearing loss. Both conductive and sensorineural hearing loss have been reported. Hearing loss is more common in mildly affected males (~85%) compared with females [
Holman et al 2011,
Perdu et al 2011].
Cranial nerve palsies. Rarely, compression of the optic nerve due to bony sclerosis can lead to vision loss, and facial palsies have been reported. This can be progressive, and typically occurs in late adolescence and early adulthood.
Musculoskeletal. Scoliosis (which can be progressive) and joint contractures are commonly observed in mildly affected males [
Holman et al 2011].
Congenital anomalies. Congenital heart disease is observed in approximately half of mildly affected males [
Perdu et al 2011]. Brain malformations including ventriculomegaly and partial agenesis of the corpus callosum are also observed in this cohort [
Holman et al 2011].
Severe phenotype. The severe phenotype manifests as a multiple-malformation syndrome, and is lethal in mid-to-late gestation or in the neonatal period [Holman et al 2011, Perdu et al 2011, Quélin et al 2015, Vasiljevic et al 2015]. Severely affected males typically have fewer of the characteristic features described in females, in part due to early mortality. In particular, macrocephaly is not always present, and longitudinal metaphyseal striations have not been observed. Severely affected males typically have multiple congenital malformations including limb patterning and skeletal defects (e.g., polysyndactyly, absent or hypoplastic fibulae), congenital heart disease, and brain, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal anomalies.
Pathophysiology
Metaphyseal striations are hypothesized to be due to the presence of two independently acting osteoblast cell lines [Rott et al 2003]. This can occur either through differential X-chromosome inactivation in a female or mosaicism for an AMER1 pathogenic variant in a male. This hypothesis would explain why constitutionally affected males with a hemizygous AMER1 pathogenic variant and only one osteoblast cell line do not have metaphyseal striations on radiographs.
Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
No genotype-phenotype correlations for AMER1 have been confirmed.
Initial reports of truncating variants at the 5' end of AMER1 predicting a severe phenotype have been disproven [Perdu et al 2010, Perdu et al 2011].
Penetrance
Penetrance appears to be 100%, albeit with variable expressivity and severity of the phenotype, even within families.
Nomenclature
Previous gene names for AMER1 include WTX and FAM123B.
OS-CS is also known as hyperostosis generalisata with striations.
In the 2023 revision of the Nosology of Genetic Skeletal Disorders [Unger et al 2023], OS-CS is referred to as AMER1-related osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis and is included in the osteosclerotic disorders group.
Prevalence
Approximately 90 individuals with molecularly confirmed OS-CS have been reported [Author, personal observation].
Differential Diagnosis
Females and mildly affected males. Disorders that may present with sclerotic bone disease similar to that observed in females (and mildly affected males) with osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) are summarized in Table 3. See also the Nosology of Genetic Skeletal Disorders: 2023 Revision, Group 24 – Osteopetrosis and related osteoclast disorders and Group 25 – Osteosclerotic disorders [Unger et al 2023] for a review of additional disorders that may be considered in the differential diagnosis of OS-CS.
Males with a severe phenotype present with a multiple-malformation syndrome, usually without metaphyseal striations, making the differential diagnosis very broad. AMER1 should be included within the gene list for any fetal or neonatal multiple-malformation presentation.
Table 3.
Genes of Interest in the Differential Diagnosis of Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
View in own window
| Gene(s) | DiffDx Disorder | MOI | Clinical Features of DiffDx Disorder |
|---|
| Overlapping w/OS-CS | Distinguishing from OS-CS |
|---|
|
ANKH
|
Craniometaphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant
| AD | Bony sclerosis of cranial bones |
|
CA2
CLCN7
LRP5
OSTM1
PLEKHM1
SNX10
TCIRG1
TNFRSF11A
TNFSF11
| Osteopetrosis 1 (OMIM PS259700 & PS607634) | AR
AD | Bony sclerosis of cranial and long bones | Absence of dysmorphic features More diffuse sclerosis of long bones Absence of metaphyseal striations
|
|
GJA1
| Craniometaphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive (OMIM 218400) | AR | Bony sclerosis of cranial bones |
|
|
LRP4
| Sclerosteosis 2 (OMIM 614305) | AD
AR | Bony sclerosis |
|
|
PORCN
| Focal dermal hypoplasia (Goltz syndrome) | XL | Metaphyseal striations |
|
|
SOST
| Endosteal hyperostosis, van Buchem type (van Buchem disease) (See SOST-Related Sclerosing Bone Dysplasias.) | AR | Bony sclerosis |
|
| Craniodiaphyseal dysplasia (OMIM 122860) | AD | Bony sclerosis; progressive overgrowth of craniofacial bones w/cranial nerve entrapment | Absence of metaphyseal striations Diaphyses of long bones expanded within the cortices Choanal stenosis a common complication
|
| Sclerosteosis (See SOST-Related Sclerosing Bone Dysplasias.) | AR | Bony sclerosis |
|
|
TGFB1
| Camurati-Engelmann disease (progressive diaphyseal dysplasia) | AD | Bony sclerosis of cranial and long bones | Absence of metaphyseal striations Pronounced diaphyseal hyperostosis of long bones Proximal muscle weakness & wide-based waddling gait
|
|
TONSL
| Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, sponastrime type (OMIM 271510) | AR | Metaphyseal striations |
|
AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; DiffDx = differential diagnosis; MOI = mode of inheritance; XL = X-linked
- 1.
See also the Nosology of Genetic Skeletal Disorders: 2023 Revision, Group 24 – Osteopetrosis and related osteoclast disorders and Group 25 – Osteosclerotic disorders [Unger et al 2023].
Voorhoeve disease (osteopathia striata) is characterized by isolated metaphyseal striations. Unlike OS-CS, Voorhoeve disease is not associated with cranial sclerosis or macrocephaly. Voorhoeve disease may be inherited in an autosomal dominant manner or occur in a single family member; the genetic cause(s) of the disorder are unknown.
Management
No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) have been published.
Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with OS-CS, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.
Table 4.
Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
View in own window
| System/Concern | Evaluation | Comment |
|---|
|
Musculoskeletal
| Skeletal survey – long bones & skull | To assess for sclerosis &/or metaphyseal striations |
| Clinical assessment for scoliosis & joint contractures | |
|
ENT
| ENT assessment | To assess for orofacial clefting |
|
Hearing
| Hearing assessment | To evaluate hearing loss |
|
Eyes
| Ophthalmology assessment | To evaluate for optic nerve compression |
|
Constitutional
| Growth assessment | To assess for short stature in surviving males (less common in females) |
|
Cognition
| Developmental assessment | |
|
Cardiac
| Cardiology assessment incl echocardiography | To assess for structural heart defects in females & surviving males |
|
Renal
| Renal ultrasound exam |
|
|
Neurology
| Neurology assessment incl brain MRI | To assess for CNS anomalies in surviving males |
|
Gastroenterology
| Imaging for malrotation performed as clinically indicated | |
Genetic
counseling
| By genetics professionals 1 | To inform affected persons & families re nature, MOI, & implications of OS-CS in order to facilitate medical & personal decision making |
Family support
& resources
| Assess need for:
| |
CNS = central nervous system; MOI = mode of inheritance; OS-CS = osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis
- 1.
Medical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified advanced genetic nurse
Treatment of Manifestations
Management by multidisciplinary specialists, including pediatrician, clinical geneticist, orthopedic surgeon, ENT specialist, and, in the presence of congenital malformations, relevant additional subspecialists, is recommended.
Table 5.
Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
View in own window
Manifestation/
Concern | Treatment | Considerations/Other |
|---|
|
Scoliosis
| Management per orthopedic surgeon | |
|
Joint contractures
| PT may be helpful. | |
|
Orofacial clefting
| Management per ENT surgeon | |
|
Hearing loss
|
|
|
|
Vision loss
| Management per ophthalmologist | Community & support groups for vision loss |
| Surgical management per neurosurgeon should be decided on a case-by-case basis. | Sclerotic bone poses surgical challenges [Katsevman et al 2016], and the success of surgical decompression of cranial nerve foramina in OS-CS is not established. |
|
Cognition
| Early intervention services & special education services as indicated | |
|
Cardiac anomalies
| Treatment per cardiologist | |
Genitourinary
anomalies
| Treatment per urologist &/or nephrologist | |
Gastrointestinal
anomalies
| Treatment per gastroenterologist &/or surgery | |
Wilms tumor &/or
other malignancy
| Standard treatment | |
Surveillance
Table 6.
Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis
View in own window
| System/Concern | Evaluation | Frequency |
|---|
|
Musculoskeletal
| Clinical assessment for scoliosis & joint contractures | Annually or as indicated |
|
Hearing
| Audiology eval |
|
Vision
| Ophthalmology eval |
|
Cognition
| Developmental assessment |
|
Wilms tumor
| Abdominal ultrasound | Every 3 mos until age 7 yrs as per Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome guidelines until OS-CS specific guidelines are established 1 |
- 1.
The association of OS-CS with Wilms tumor has only recently been established [Bach et al 2021]. Until there is an evidentiary base for OS-CS-specific surveillance guidelines, surveillance based on Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome guidelines is recommended [Brioude et al 2018; Bach et al 2021; Author, personal communication with Professor Stephen Robertson].
Evaluation of Relatives at Risk
It is appropriate to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk relatives of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from early diagnosis and treatment of hearing and/or vision loss and congenital heart disease, from cancer surveillance, and from review for congenital anomalies (males).
See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.
Pregnancy Management
No specific OS-CS pregnancy management is described, but guidelines for management of pregnant individuals with a skeletal dysplasia should be consulted [Savarirayan et al 2018].
Therapies Under Investigation
Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.
Genetic Counseling
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with
information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them
make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic
risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic
status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or
ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics
professional. —ED.
Mode of Inheritance
Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) is inherited in an X-linked manner.
Risk to Family Members
Parents of a male proband
The father of an affected male will not have the disorder nor will he be hemizygous for the AMER1 pathogenic variant; therefore, he does not require further evaluation/testing.
In a family with more than one affected individual, the mother of an affected male is an obligate heterozygote. Note: If a woman has more than one affected child and no other affected relatives and if the AMER1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in her leukocyte DNA, she most likely has germline mosaicism.
If a male is the only affected family member (i.e., a simplex case):
The mother may be a heterozygote.
The affected male may have a de novo
AMER1 pathogenic variant (in which case the mother is not a heterozygote). About 25% of affected males have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant.
Note: If a male proband is found to be mosaic for the AMER1 pathogenic variant, this is presumed to be due to a de novo postzygotic change in the proband, and is not inherited from either parent.
The mother may have germline mosaicism.
Molecular genetic testing of the mother is recommended to confirm her genetic status and to allow reliable recurrence risk assessment.
Sibs of a male proband. The risk to sibs depends on the genetic status of the mother:
If the mother of the proband has an AMER1 pathogenic variant, the chance of transmitting it in each pregnancy is 50%.
Females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will have variable manifestations of OS-CS (see Clinical Description,
Affected Females)
Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be hemizygotes and will have variable manifestations ranging from mid-late gestation and neonatal lethality to the mild phenotype (see Clinical Description,
Affected Males).
Of the males reported in the literature, approximately half died in mid-late gestation or the neonatal period. However, the incidence of lethality is likely to be under-reported, due to the nonspecific multiple-malformation presentation of males, increasing the likelihood of a missed diagnosis. The low number of reported males suggests that early fetal loss is also possible.
If the proband represents a simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) and if the AMER1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of the mother, the risk to sibs is presumed to be low but greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of maternal germline mosaicism.
Parents of a female proband
A female proband may have inherited the AMER1 pathogenic variant from either her mother or her father, or the pathogenic variant may be de novo. About 45% of affected females have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant.
Detailed evaluation of the parents and review of the extended family history may help distinguish probands with a de novo pathogenic variant from those with an inherited pathogenic variant. Molecular genetic testing of the mother (and subsequently the father) can help to determine if the pathogenic variant was inherited.
Sibs of a female proband. The risk to sibs depends on the genetic status of the parents:
If the mother of the proband has an AMER1 pathogenic variant, the chance of transmitting it in each pregnancy is 50%.
Females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will have variable manifestations of OS-CS (see
Clinical Description).
Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be hemizygotes and will have variable manifestations ranging from mid-late gestation and neonatal lethality to the mild phenotype (see
Clinical Description).
Of the males reported in the literature, approximately half died in mid-late gestation or the neonatal period. However, the incidence of lethality is likely to be under-reported, due to the nonspecific multiple-malformation presentation of males, increasing the likelihood of a missed diagnosis. The low number of reported males suggests that early fetal loss is also possible.
If the father of the proband has an
AMER1 pathogenic variant, it should be presumed he will transmit the
AMER1 pathogenic variant to all his daughters and none of his sons. Only two instances of paternal vertical transmission have been reported; in both families the fathers were mosaic [
Ciceri et al 2013,
Mi et al 2020].
If the proband represents a simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) and if the AMER1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the risk to sibs is greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of parental germline mosaicism.
Offspring of a male proband. Men with an AMER1 pathogenic variant will transmit the AMER1 pathogenic variant to all of their daughters and none of their sons.
Offspring of a female proband. Women with an AMER1 pathogenic variant have a 50% chance of transmitting the pathogenic variant to each child:
Other family members. If the mother of the proband is heterozygous for an AMER1 pathogenic variant (or, theoretically, the father is hemizygous for the AMER1 pathogenic variant), her (or his) family members may be at risk of being affected.
Note: Molecular genetic testing may be able to identify the family member in whom a de novo pathogenic variant arose, information that could help determine genetic risk status of the extended family.
Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing
Once the AMER1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.
Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.
Resources
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella
support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder
and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other
organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.
Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Phone: 866-337-5220 (toll-free); 202-337-5221 (TTY)
Fax: 202-337-8314
Email: info@agbell.org
American Society for Deaf Children
Phone: 800-942-2732 (ASDC)
Email: info@deafchildren.org
National Association of the Deaf
Phone: 301-587-1788 (Purple/ZVRS); 301-328-1443 (Sorenson); 301-338-6380 (Convo)
Fax: 301-587-1791
Email: nad.info@nad.org
UCLA International Skeletal Dysplasia Registry (ISDR)
Phone: 310-825-8998
Molecular Genetics
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
Table A.
Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis: Genes and Databases
View in own window
Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from
HGNC;
chromosome locus from
OMIM;
protein from UniProt.
For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click
here.
Molecular Pathogenesis
AMER1 (also known as FAM123B or WTX) encodes adenomatous polyposis coli membrane recruitment protein 1.
The AMER1 protein acts as an inhibitor of the canonic WNT signaling pathway, through the ubiquitination and degradation of beta-catenin [Tanneberger et al 2011]. The WNT signaling pathway acts on a range of cellular processes including body axis patterning and bone morphogenesis. Up- or downregulation of this pathway can have a broad range of phenotypic effects [Huybrechts et al 2020].
Reduced expression of AMER1 (e.g., through a loss-of-function variant) leads to an accumulation of beta catenin in the nucleus. This in turn causes upregulation of the WNT pathway and osteoblastic function, leading to bony sclerosis [Mi et al 2020].
Metaphyseal striations are hypothesized to be due to the presence of two independently acting osteoblast-cell lines [Rott et al 2003]. This can occur either through differential X-chromosome inactivation in a female or mosaicism for an AMER1 pathogenic variant in a male. This hypothesis would explain why constitutionally affected males with a hemizygous AMER1 pathogenic variant and only one osteoblast cell line do not have metaphyseal striations on radiographs.
Mechanism of disease causation. Loss of function
AMER1-specific laboratory technical considerations.
AMER1 contains two exons, the first of which is noncoding. To date, almost all reported pathogenic variants causing osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OS-CS) are germline truncating variants in exon 2 or whole-gene deletions [Author, personal observation].
However, two pathogenic variants in the noncoding exon 1 of AMER1 have been reported, which may not be captured by traditional sequencing methods [Mi et al 2020].
Mosaicism has also been reported in several males [Joseph et al 2010, Holman et al 2011, Perdu et al 2011, Chénier et al 2012, Hague et al 2017], and in a male with Klinefelter syndrome [Fradin et al 2017]. Alternative cell lines, alternative technologies, or an increased depth of sequencing should be considered to identify suspected mosaic pathogenic variants.
Cancer and Benign Tumors
Somatic AMER1 variants are found in 15%-30% of Wilms tumors, evenly divided between mesenchymal- and epithelial-derived tumors [Fukuzawa et al 2009].
Early studies suggested that germline AMER1 variants did not predispose to Wilms tumors; however, a recent association has been reported in four individuals including one with bilateral Wilms tumors [Bach et al 2021].
Chapter Notes
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Professor Stephen Robertson and his working groups for their significant contributions to the OS-CS literature and for communications regarding cancer surveillance recommendations.
References
Bach A, Mi J, Hunter M, Halliday BJ, Garcia-Minaur S, Sperotto F, Trevisson E, Markie D, Morison IM, Shinawi M, Willis DN, Robertson SP. Wilms tumor in patients with osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29:396–401. [
PMC free article: PMC7940487] [
PubMed: 32879452]
Brioude F, Kalish JM, Mussa A, Foster AC, Bliek J, Ferrero GB, Boonen SE, Cole T, Baker R, Bertoletti M, Cocchi G, Coze C, De Pellegrin M, Hussain K, Ibrahim A, Kilby MD, Krajewska-Walasek M, Kratz CP, Ladusans EJ, Lapunzina P, Le Bouc Y, Maas SM, Macfonal F, Ounap K, Peruzzi L, Rossignol S, Russo S, Shipster C, Skorka A, Tatton-Brown K, Tenorio J, Tortora C, Gronskov K, Netchine I, Hennekam RC, Prawitt D, Tumer Z, Eggermann T, Mackay DJG, Riccio A, Maher ER. Clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement.
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:229–49. [
PMC free article: PMC6022848] [
PubMed: 29377879]
Chénier S, Noor A, Dupuis L, Stavropoulos DJ, Mendoza-Londono R. Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis and developmental delay in a male with a mosaic deletion in chromosome region Xq11.2.
Am J Med Genet Part A. 2012;158A:2946–52. [
PubMed: 22987541]
Ciceri S, Cattaneo E, Fossati C, Radice P, Selicorni A, Perotti D. First evidence of vertical paternal transmission of osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis.
Am J Med Genet Part A. 2013;161A:1173–6. [
PubMed: 23494899]
Fradin M, Collet C, Ract I, Odent S, Guggenbuhl P. First case of osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis in an adult male with Klinefelter syndrome.
Joint Bone Spine. 2017;84:87–90. [
PubMed: 27369646]
Fujita A, Ochi N, Fujikmaki H, Muramatsu H, Takahashi Y, Natsume J, Kojima S, Nakashima M, Tsurusaki Y, Saitsu H, Matsumoto N, Miyake N. A novel
WTX mutation in a female patient with osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis and hepatoblastoma.
Am J Med Genet Part A. 2014;164A:998–1002. [
PubMed: 24459086]
Fukuzawa R, Anaka MR, Weeks RJ, Morison IM, Reeve AE. Canonical WNT signaling determines lineage specificity in Wilms tumour.
Oncogene. 2009;28:1063–75. [
PubMed: 19137020]
Fukuzawa R, Holman S, Chow CW, Savarirayan R, Reeve AE, Robertson SP.
WTX mutations can occur both early and late in the pathogenesis of Wilms tumour.
J Med Genet. 2010;47:791–4. [
PubMed: 20679664]
Hague J, Delon I, Brugger K, Martin H, Sparnon L, Simonic I, Abbs S, Park S-M.
Am J Med Genet Part A. 2017;173:1931–5. [
PubMed: 28497491]
Herman SB, Holman SK, Robertson SP, Davidson L, Taragin B, Samanich J. Severe osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis in a female case with whole WTX gene deletion.
Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A:594–9. [
PubMed: 23401208]
Holman SK, Daniel P, Jenkins ZA, Herron RL, Morgan T, Savarirayan R, Chow CW, Bohring A, Mosel A, Lacombe D, Steiner B, Schmitt-Mechelke T, Schroter B, Raas-Rothschild A, Garcia-Minaur S, Porteus M, Parker M, Quarrell O, Tapon D, Cormier-Daire V, Manour S, Nash R, Bindoff LA, Fiskerstrand T, Robertson SP. The male phenotype in osteopathia striata congenita with cranial sclerosis.
Am J Med Genet Part A. 2011;155A:2397–408. [
PubMed: 22043478]
Holman SK, Morgan T, Baujat G, Cormier-Daire V, Cho T-J, Lees M, Samanich J, Tapon D, Hove HD, Hing A, Hennekam R, Robertson SP. Osteopathia striata congenita with cranial sclerosis and intellectual disability due to contiguous gene deletions involving the
WTX locus.
Clin Genet. 2013;83:251–6. [
PubMed: 22670894]
Jenkins ZA, van Kogelenberg M, Morgan T, Jeffs A, Fukuzawa R, Pearl E, Thaller C, Hing AV, Porteous ME, Garcia-Minaur S, Bohring A, Lacombe D, Stewart F, Fiskerstrand T, Bindoff L, Berland S, Ades LC, Tchan M, David A, Wilson LC, Hennekam RCM, Donnai D, Mansour S, Cormier-Daire V, Robertson SP. Germline mutations in
WTX cause a sclerosing skeletal dysplasia but do not predispose to tumorigenesis.
Nat Genet. 2009;41:95–100. [
PubMed: 19079258]
Katsevman GA, Turner RC, Lucke-Wolde BP, Sedney CL, Bhatia S. Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis (OSCS): review of the literature and case report demonstrating challenges of spinal fusion after trauma.
Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:1115–20. [
PubMed: 27068044]
Mi J, Parthasarathy P, Halliday BJ, Morgan T, Dean J, Nowaczyk MJM, Markie D, Robertson SP, Wade EM. Deletion of exon 1 in
AMER1 in osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis.
Genes. 2020;11:1439. [
PMC free article: PMC7760256] [
PubMed: 33265914]
Perdu B, de Freitas F, Frints SGM, Schouten M, Schrander-Stumpel C, Barbosa M, Pinto-Basto J, Reis-Lima M, de Vernejoul MC, Becker K, Freckmann ML, Keymolen K, Haan E, Savarirayan R, Koenic R, Zabel B, Vanhoenacker FM, Van Hul W. Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis owing to
WTX gene defect.
J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:82–90. [
PubMed: 20209645]
Perdu B, Lakeman P, Mortier G, Koenig R, Lachmeijer AMA, Van Hul W. Two novel
WTX mutations underscore the unpredictability of male survival in osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis.
Clin Genet. 2011;80:383–8. [
PubMed: 20950377]
Quélin C, Loget P, D'Hervé D, Fradin M, Milon J, Ferry M, Body-Bechou D, Tréguier C, Garcia Hoyos M, Odent S. Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis: when a fetal malformation syndrome reveals maternal pathology.
Prenatal Diagn. 2015;35:200–2. [
PubMed: 25296999]
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24. [
PMC free article: PMC4544753] [
PubMed: 25741868]
Rott HD, Krieg P, Rutschle H, Kraus C. Multiple malformations in a male and maternal osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis.
Genet Couns. 2003;14:281–8. [
PubMed: 14577672]
Savarirayan R, Rossiter JP, Hoover-Fong JE, Irving M, Bompadre V, Goldberg MJ, Bober MB, Cho T-J, Kamps SE, Mackenzie WG, Raggio C, Spencer SS, White KK. Best practice guidelines regarding prenatal evaluation and delivery of patients with skeletal dysplasia. Am J Obs Gyn. 2018;545-62. [
PubMed: 30048634]
Sperotto F, Bisogno G, Opocher E, Rossi S, Rigon C, Trevisson E, Mercolini F. Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis and Wilms tumor: Coincidence or consequence?
Clin Genet. 2017;92:674–5. [
PubMed: 29120061]
Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Chapman M, Evans K, Azevedo L, Hayden M, Heywood S, Millar DS, Phillips AD, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting.
Hum Genet. 2020;139:1197–207. [
PMC free article: PMC7497289] [
PubMed: 32596782]
Tanneberger K, Pfister AS, Kriz V, Bryja V, Schambony A, Behrens J. Structural and functional characterization of the Wnt inhibitor APC membrane recruitment 1 (Amer1).
J Biol Chem. 2011;286:19204–14. [
PMC free article: PMC3103299] [
PubMed: 21498506]
Unger S, Ferreira CR, Mortier GR, Ali H, Bertola DR, Calder A, Cohn DH, Cormier-Daire V, Girisha KM, Hall C, Krakow D, Makitie O, Mundlos S, Nishimura G, Robertson SP, Savarirayan R, Sillence D, Simon M, Sutton VR, Warman ML, Superti-Furga A. Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision.
Am J Med Genet A. 2023. Epub ahead of print. [
PMC free article: PMC10081954] [
PubMed: 36779427]
Vasiljevic A, Azzi C, Lacalm A, Combourieu D, Collardeau-Frechon S, Dijoud F, Massardier J, Van Hul W. Fromageoux, Guibaud L, Gaucherand P, Cordier M-P, Massoud M. Prenatal diagnosis of osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis.
Prenatal Diag. 2015;35:302–4. [
PubMed: 25284440]
