Summary
Clinical characteristics.
The phenotypic spectrum of sepiapterin reductase deficiency (SRD), which ranges from significant motor and cognitive deficits to only minimal findings, has not been completely elucidated. Clinical features in the majority of affected individuals include motor and speech delay, axial hypotonia, dystonia, weakness, and oculogyric crises; symptoms show diurnal fluctuation and sleep benefit. Other common features include parkinsonian signs (tremor, bradykinesia, masked facies, rigidity), limb hypertonia, hyperreflexia, intellectual disability, psychiatric and/or behavioral abnormalities, autonomic dysfunction, and sleep disturbances (hypersomnolence, difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, and drowsiness). Most affected individuals have nonspecific features in infancy including developmental delays and axial hypotonia; other features develop over time.
Diagnosis/testing.
The diagnosis of sepiapterin reductase deficiency is established in a proband by detection of biallelic pathogenic variants in SPR on molecular genetic testing or characteristic abnormalities of CSF neurotransmitters and pterins.
Management.
Treatment of manifestations: L-dopa in combination with carbidopa (or another peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor) is the main therapy used to correct CNS dopamine deficiency; 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), also in combination with carbidopa, has shown additional clinical benefit in some. When L-dopa/5HTP/carbidopa are not tolerated or sufficiently effective some individuals may benefit from use of other agents such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, melatonin, dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, and methylphenidate. These medications most consistently correct motor abnormalities; however, in some individuals cognitive manifestations remain more refractory.
Prevention of secondary complications: Physical, occupational, and speech therapy may improve or maintain motor function.
Surveillance: Data are insufficient to determine how frequently CSF levels of dopamine and serotonin metabolites should be evaluated and whether these levels should be used to adjust medication doses.
Agents/circumstances to avoid: Although adverse events with specific agents have not been reported in persons with SRD, the following should be avoided on a theoretic basis: sulfa drugs, methotrexate, nitrous oxide, neuroleptics, and other dopamine antagonists (e.g., metoclopramide).
Evaluation of relatives at risk: Although no data on outcomes are available, it is appropriate to use molecular genetic testing for the SPR pathogenic variants identified in the proband and/or analysis of CSF neurotransmitter metabolites and pterins to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger sibs of an affected individual in order to identify as soon as possible those who would benefit from early initiation of treatment to correct CNS dopamine and serotonin deficiency.
Genetic counseling.
SRD is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. At conception, each sib of an affected individual has a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier. Carrier testing for at-risk relatives and prenatal testing for pregnancies at increased risk are possible if the SPR pathogenic variants in the family are known.
Diagnosis
No formal diagnostic criteria for sepiapterin reductase deficiency (SRD) have been published. A diagnostic algorithm is presented in a recent review [Friedman et al 2012].
Suggestive Findings
Sepiapterin reductase deficiency (SRD) should be suspected in individuals with characteristic clinical findings. The phenotypic spectrum is broad and suggestive signs are often nonspecific.
Core clinical features present in more than 65% of affected individuals:
Other common features:
Intellectual disability
Limb hypertonia and hyperreflexia
Parkinsonian signs (tremor, bradykinesia, masked facies, rigidity)
Psychiatric and/or behavioral abnormalities
Sleep disturbances (hypersomnolence, difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, drowsiness)
Autonomic dysfunction (excessive sweating, ptosis, nasal congestion, temperature instability)
Individuals with any of the following three broad sets of findings should be considered to possibly have SRD [Friedman et al 2012]:
Developmental delays with axial hypotonia
Unexplained "cerebral palsy," especially if dystonia is present
An L-dopa-responsive motor disorder that may include dystonia. L-dopa responsiveness is evaluated in the following manner: L-dopa (in combination with 10%-25% carbidopa) may be introduced at 1 mg/kg/day and advanced slowly by 1 mg/kg/day over days/weeks monitoring for symptomatic improvement and side effects as the dose is raised. Although data are insufficient to provide precise dosing guidelines, benefit is most often achieved at low dose and is dramatic and rapid (hours to days). Because the response may be delayed or require a high dose (≥10 mg/kg/d) (as has been observed in
cyclohydrolase 1-deficient dopa-responsive dystonia [DYT-GCH1]), the dose should be increased and maintained for two to four weeks – barring side effects – to fully assess efficacy of L-dopa [Author, personal observation].
Note: Given the broad range of neurologic manifestations (from asymptomatic to severe global developmental delay) and dramatic response to L-dopa, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for SRD or other monoamine neurotransmitter disorders (see Differential Diagnosis) in individuals with unexplained neurologic dysfunction.
Establishing the Diagnosis
The diagnosis of sepiapterin reductase deficiency is established in a proband by detection of biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in SPR on molecular genetic testing (see Table 1) or characteristic abnormalities of CSF neurotransmitters and pterins.
Note: Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of biallelic SPR variants of uncertain significance (or of one known SPR pathogenic variant and one SPR variant of uncertain significance) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis. (3) While analysis of either sepiapterin reductase enzyme activity in fibroblasts or pterin levels in cytokine stimulated fibroblasts could be considered [Bonafé et al 2001a], neither test is widely available or commonly used. (4) A phenylalanine load test [Hyland et al 1997], which is not commonly used, could be considered when molecular testing and analysis of CSF neurotransmitters are not available. While an abnormal phenylalanine load is suggestive, it is not diagnostic of SRD, as abnormal results are observed in other BH4 deficiencies (including DYT-GCH1).
Molecular genetic testing approaches may include single-gene testing and use of a multigene panel:
Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis is performed first, followed by consideration of gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis if only one or no pathogenic variant is found in an individual with characteristic clinical findings and/or abnormalities of CSF metabolites. Note: To date no SPR deletions or duplications requiring gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis have been reported.
A multigene panel that includes
SPR and other genes of interest (see
Differential Diagnosis) may also be considered. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this
GeneReview; thus, clinicians need to determine which multigene panel is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
For an introduction to multigene panels click
here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found
here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Sepiapterin Reductase Deficiency
View in own window
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method |
---|
SPR
| Sequence analysis 3 | All sequence variants reported to date 4 |
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5 | Unknown 6 |
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
- 4.
A total of approximately 50 probands have been reported to date [Bonafé et al 2001a, Bonafé et al 2001b, Steinberger et al 2004, Neville et al 2005, Abeling et al 2006, Echenne et al 2006, Friedman et al 2006, Verbeek et al 2008, Clot et al 2009, Kusmierska et al 2009, Leu-Semenescu et al 2010, Mazzuca et al 2010, Wali et al 2010, Arrabal et al 2011, Bainbridge et al 2011, Dill et al 2012, Friedman et al 2012, Lohmann et al 2012, Thibert et al 2012, Leuzzi et al 2013, Koht et al 2014].
- 5.
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques including quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.
- 6.
A single report of deletion involving SPR is listed in ClinVar. In addition to SPR, this deletion involves EMX1 and SXN5. No clinical details are provided and thus no conclusions can be drawn regarding the impact of deletion of SPR.
Characteristic CSF abnormalities of neurotransmitters and pterins include:
Clinical Characteristics
Clinical Description
The phenotypic spectrum of sepiapterin reductase deficiency (SRD) has not been completely elucidated due to the small number of affected individuals reported to date, lack of systematic diagnostic evaluation and long-term follow up, and the absence of data on the prevalence and natural history of findings in untreated individuals. Of particular note, severity varies: some individuals manifest significant motor and cognitive deficits and others only minimal findings. Those with minimal findings may present at an older age or be identified because of the diagnosis of SRD in a sib [Arrabal et al 2011, Friedman et al 2012].
Clinical features in 38 individuals with SRD are summarized by Friedman et al [2012]. A few affected individuals not included in this review and described elsewhere have additional features [Steinberger et al 2004, Clot et al 2009, Lohmann et al 2012, Leuzzi et al 2013, Koht et al 2014].
Clinical features present in more than 65% of affected individuals include motor and speech delay, axial hypotonia, dystonia, weakness, oculogyric crises, and diurnal fluctuation of symptoms with sleep benefit. Other common features include parkinsonian signs (tremor, bradykinesia, masked facies, rigidity), limb hypertonia, hyperreflexia, intellectual disability, psychiatric and/or behavioral abnormalities, autonomic dysfunction, and sleep disturbances (hypersomnolence, drowsiness, difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep related to alteration of the sleep-wake circadian rhythm).
Most affected individuals have nonspecific features in infancy including developmental delays and axial hypotonia. In the next few years other features that may develop include limb hypertonia, hyperreflexia, dystonia, and more apparent diurnal fluctuation and sleep disturbance.
In some instances, dystonia may present as paroxysmal stiffening of limbs and/or trunk with gaze deviation and tremor of the tongue, limbs, and/ or head [Dill et al 2012, Leuzzi et al 2013].
Numerous rarely reported findings overlap with those typical of other disorders of monoamine neurotransmitter biosynthesis (see Differential Diagnosis).
Seizures (mostly febrile) occasionally occur, though frequency may be over-reported as oculogyric crises and paroxysmal stiffening episodes may be confused with seizures.
A few reports note low birth weight [Bonafé et al 2001b, Leuzzi et al 2013], poor somatic growth [Lohmann et al 2012, Leuzzi et al 2013], and/or microcephaly [Blau et al 1998, Bonafé et al 2001b, Leuzzi et al 2013].
During later childhood, abnormalities in behavior and cognition become more apparent. These may be under-reported due to the prominence of the motor features.
While many affected individuals have intellectual disability, others with mild learning disabilities or normal cognition have been reported.
Psychiatric and/or behavioral findings most commonly include inattention, irritability, and anxiety; however, a wide range of symptoms may occur. It is hypothesized (though not yet proven) that early treatment may mitigate cognitive or psychiatric/behavioral abnormalities.
Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
Although several possible genotype-phenotype correlations have been suggested in individuals with biallelic SPR pathogenic variants, due to the small number of affected individuals these conclusions remain uncertain [Arrabal et al 2011, Friedman et al 2012]. Phenotypic variability is broad even among family members with identical pathogenic variants.
One individual heterozygous for a SPR pathogenic variant in the 5’ untranslated region with a mild form of L-dopa-responsive dystonia and reduced SR activity in fibroblasts has been reported [Steinberger et al 2004].
Prevalence
No data are available on the prevalence of SRD.
A total of approximately 50 probands have been reported to date [Bonafé et al 2001a, Bonafé et al 2001b, Steinberger et al 2004, Neville et al 2005, Abeling et al 2006, Echenne et al 2006, Friedman et al 2006, Verbeek et al 2008, Clot et al 2009, Kusmierska et al 2009, Leu-Semenescu et al 2010, Mazzuca et al 2010, Wali et al 2010, Arrabal et al 2011, Bainbridge et al 2011, Dill et al 2012, Friedman et al 2012, Lohmann et al 2012, Thibert et al 2012, Leuzzi et al 2013, Koht et al 2014].
SRD may be under-recognized due to lack of awareness.
Differential Diagnosis
L-dopa-responsive motor disorders
Dystonia may be a prominent, though often late and not universal feature of SRD [Friedman et al 2012]. For a detailed differential for dystonia, see Dystonia Overview.
Cerebral palsy. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency (SRD) often presents with nonspecific symptoms including global delay with hypotonia or a nonspecific gait disorder, often with cognitive impairment. Hyperreflexia and/or striatal toe (simulating a Babinski reflex but without fanning of the toes) may be present. Oculogyric crises, if recognized, are a frequent clue to dopamine deficiency syndrome; however, as other neurologic manifestations are nonspecific, affected individuals may be misdiagnosed with cerebral palsy or an undefined L-dopa-responsive motor disorder [Friedman et al 2012]. These features as well as the varied and nonspecific presentation may lead to a misdiagnosis of cerebral palsy [Friedman et al 2012]. The differential for global delay and cerebral palsy are broad and beyond the scope of this review.
A suggested algorithm for evaluation of patients with global delay with hypotonia, dystonia, or L-dopa-responsive motor disorder may be found in Friedman et al [2012].
Juvenile Parkinson disease. Parkinsonian signs are frequent and may suggest juvenile Parkinson disease, most commonly caused by mutation of PRKN, PINK1, DJ1, or ATP13A2. Typically manifestations in SRD begin at an earlier age than juvenile Parkinson disease. Differentiation between SRD and juvenile Parkinson disease is critical for prognostication and therapeutic management: Individuals with SRD may derive sustained benefit from L-dopa whereas those with juvenile Parkinson disease will develop complications with L-dopa therapy (and although it is controversial, dopamine agonists should be considered instead).
Disorders of biopterin metabolism. Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) deficiencies are caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in one of the genes involving biosynthesis or recycling of BH4, a cofactor in the phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan hydroxylation reaction. These genes and disorders are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) Deficiencies
View in own window
Gene | Disorder | OMIM |
---|
GCH1
| GTP cyclohydrolase I deficiency |
233910
|
PTS
| 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase (PTPS) deficiency |
261640
|
PCBD1
| Pterin-4a-alpha-carbinolamine dehydratase deficiency |
264070
|
QDPR
| Dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR) deficiency |
261630
|
Symptoms, which result from impaired phenylalanine homeostasis and serotonin and catecholamine biosynthesis, overlap significantly with SRD. Unlike SRD, these conditions typically (though not always) present with hyperphenylalaninemia detected on newborn screening. More information on the BH4 deficiencies can be found at www.biopku.org.
Management
Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with sepiapterin reductase deficiency (SRD), the following evaluations are recommended:
Consultation with a neurologist
Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy evaluations depending on severity of manifestations
Neuropsychological evaluation depending on the severity of manifestations
Social services consultation depending on the severity of manifestations
Consultation with a clinical geneticist and/or genetic counselor
Treatment of Manifestations
Therapy is aimed at correcting central nervous system (CNS) neurotransmitter deficits.
Recommended treatments are based on the few reported cases in the literature and extrapolation from strategies employed in treatment of other neurotransmitter disorders.
While the medications discussed below reduce manifestations of SRD, response can range from complete resolution to partial improvement. These medications most consistently correct motor abnormalities while in some cognitive manifestations remain more refractory.
Often, medications must be prescribed "off-label" without established pediatric dose ranges [Friedman et al 2012]:
L-dopa (0.1-16 mg/kg/day) in combination with 10%-25% carbidopa (or another peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor) is the main therapy to correct CNS dopamine deficiency. Optimal therapeutic level is determined by clinical response.
5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) (1-6 mg/kg/day) also in combination with carbidopa to correct CNS serotonin deficiency has shown additional clinical benefit in some.
Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH
4; sapropterin dihydrocloride) may in theory be of benefit, although none was reported in four patients treated for only a short time [
Friedman et al 2006,
Friedman et al 2012]. Note that it is difficult to achieve adequate CNS levels of BH
4 due to limited transport across the blood brain barrier.
Other agents used when L-dopa/5HTP/carbidopa are not tolerated or sufficiently effective which have shown benefit in single or small numbers of patients include:
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (selegeline)
Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (sertraline)
Melatonin
Dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, pramipexole)
Anticholinergics
Methylphenidate
Prevention of Secondary Complications
Physical, occupational, and speech therapy may improve or maintain function.
Surveillance
Data are insufficient to determine how frequently CSF levels of dopamine and serotonin metabolites should be evaluated and whether these levels should be used to adjust medication doses. Practices range from at least annual assessment of CNS neurotransmitter metabolites to adjustment of neurotransmitter precursor therapy based solely on clinical manifestations.
Because clinical manifestations are more difficult to assess in children, it would seem prudent to evaluate CSF neurotransmitter metabolites two to four times yearly in children younger than age two years and at least yearly in children younger than age ten years.
Note: Plasma prolactin levels may inversely correlate with CNS dopamine levels but are neither a sensitive nor specific marker [Leuzzi et al 2002, Furukawa et al 2003, Concolino et al 2008].
Agents/Circumstances to Avoid
Although adverse events with specific agents have not been reported in persons with SRD, several should be avoided on a theoretic basis including:
Evaluation of Relatives at Risk
While no data on outcomes are available, it is appropriate to use molecular genetic testing for the SPR pathogenic variants identified in the proband and/or analysis of CSF neurotransmitter metabolites and pterins to clarify the genetic status of apparently asymptomatic older and younger sibs of an affected individual in order to identify as soon as possible those who would benefit from early initiation of treatment to correct CNS dopamine and serotonin deficiency.
See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.
Pregnancy Management
No pregnancies have been reported to date in women with SRD.
Based on reports that suggest that L-dopa may be advantageous during pregnancy in women with GTP cyclohydrolase 1-deficient dopa-responsive dystonia (DYT-GCH1), it would seem prudent for women with SRD to continue L-dopa therapy during pregnancy [Trender-Gerhard et al 2009, Watanabe & Matsubara 2012].
Therapies Under Investigation
Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.
Genetic Counseling
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with
information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them
make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic
risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic
status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or
ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics
professional. —ED.
Mode of Inheritance
Sepiapterin reductase deficiency is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.
Risk to Family Members
Parents of a proband
The parents of an affected child are obligate heterozygotes (i.e., carriers of one SPR pathogenic variant).
Heterozygotes are generally asymptomatic and are not at risk of developing the disorder. Current data are insufficient to associate clinical manifestations with heterozygosity for an SPR pathogenic variant; however, several anecdotal reports have raised this possibility, including the following:
An individual with a heterozygous
SPR pathogenic variant in the 5’ untranslated region and a mild L-dopa-responsive dystonia phenotype [
Steinberger et al 2004]
The presence of other manifestations including dystonia and parkinsonism in relatives (who had not undergone molecular genetic testing) of individuals with SRD [
Friedman et al 2006,
Lohmann et al 2012]
Sibs of a proband
At conception, each sib of an affected individual has a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier.
Once an at-risk sib is known to be unaffected, the risk of the sib being a carrier of a SPR pathogenic variant is 2/3.
Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic and are usually not at risk of developing the disorder (see Parents of a proband).
Offspring of a proband. Individuals with sepiapterin reductase deficiency have not been reported to reproduce; however, only a few identified individuals are of childbearing age.
Other family members. Each sib of the proband’s parents is at a 50% risk of being a carrier of a SPR pathogenic variant.
Carrier (Heterozygote) Detection
Carrier testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the SPR pathogenic variants in the family.
Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing
Once the SPR pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk and preimplantation genetic testing are possible. Because individuals with biallelic SPR pathogenic variants may be asymptomatic, predicting the phenotype based on results of prenatal testing may not be reliable.
Resources
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella
support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder
and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other
organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.
Dystonia UK
United Kingdom
Email: info@dystonia.org.uk
Dystonia Medical Research Foundation
Phone: 312-755-0198; 800-377-DYST (3978)
Email: dystonia@dystonia-foundation.org
Metabolic Support UK
United Kingdom
Phone: 0845 241 2173
Global Dystonia Registry
Dystonia Medical Research Foundation
Email: Coordinator@globaldystoniaregistry.org
International Working Group on Neurotransmitter Related Disorders (iNTD) Patient Registry
Molecular Genetics
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
Table A.
Sepiapterin Reductase Deficiency: Genes and Databases
View in own window
Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from
HGNC;
chromosome locus from
OMIM;
protein from UniProt.
For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click
here.
Gene structure.
SPR spans 4.8 kb and comprises three exons. There is no evidence for alternative splicing variants [Bonafé 2006]. For a detailed summary of gene and protein information, see Table A, Gene.
Pathogenic variants. Seventeen pathogenic variants have been reported in SPR [Friedman et al 2012, Koht et al 2014]. Pathogenic variants are homozygous or compound heterozygous except for a single individual heterozygous for a SPR pathogenic variant in the 5' untranslated region with a mild form of L-dopa-responsive dystonia and reduced sepiapterin reductase activity in fibroblasts [Steinberger et al 2004]. The authors did not report whether gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis was performed to evaluate for deletion on the other allele.
Known pathogenic variants are missense, nonsense, and frameshift. Pathogenic variants have been found in all three exons, the 5’ untranslated region, and the intronic region in the splicing acceptor consensus sequence preceding exon 3 [Bonafé 2006, Friedman et al 2012, Koht et al 2014].
Homozygosity for the intronic variant c.596-2A>G was the most common genotype found in a cohort of affected individuals from Malta, suggesting a possible founder effect [Neville et al 2005, Bonafé 2006, Friedman et al 2012].
Table 3.
SPR Pathogenic Variants Discussed in This GeneReview
View in own window
Variants listed in the table have been provided by the author. GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.
GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen.hgvs.org). See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.
Normal gene product.
SPR cDNA encodes a monomer of 261 amino acids. Sepiapterin reductase is a homodimer with a predicted molecular mass of 56 kd [Bonafé 2006].
Abnormal gene product. Biallelic pathogenic variants in SPR result in dysfunctional SR protein, decreased synthesis of BH4, and accumulation of BH2 and sepiapterin in the central nervous system. Alternative pathways in the liver and other tissues compensate for lack of sepiapterin reductase and account for normal phenylalanine levels and lack of neurotransmitter or pterin abnormalities in the periphery [Bonafé 2006].
Symptoms arise primarily from impaired central nervous system serotonin and catecholamine production. Reduced neurotransmitter production is the result of both reduced activity of tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases due to reduced levels of BH4 cofactor as well as direct inhibition of these hydroxylases by accumulated BH2 [Bonafé 2006]. In addition, altered BH4:BH2 ratios may uncouple nitric oxide synthase (an enzyme dependent on the BH4 cofactor), and increase free radical production [Blau et al 2001, Bonafé et al 2001b]. The effect of these perturbations on the clinical picture is unclear.
Neurotransmitter deficiency is primarily responsible for clinical manifestations; however, several lines of evidence suggest that sepiapterin reductase deficiency may also affect maturation of the dopaminergic system as well as stabilization of the protein tyrosine hydroxylase [Okuno & Fujisawa1985, Takazawa et al 2008, Homma et al 2011, Homma et al 2013].
Chapter Notes
Acknowledgments
Thank you to patients and families whose participation has enabled us to learn about sepiapterin reductase deficiency and bring benefit to individuals identified with this condition in the future.
References
Literature Cited
Abeling
NG, Duran
M, Bakker
HD, Stroomer
L, Thony
B, Blau
N, Booij
J, Poll-The
BT. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency an autosomal recessive DOPA-responsive dystonia.
Mol Genet Metab.
2006;89:116-20.
[
PubMed: 16650784]
Arrabal
L, Teresa
L, Sanchez-Alcudia
R, Castro
M, Medrano
C, Gutierrez-Solana
L, Roldan
S, Ormazabal
A, Perez-Cerda
C, Merinero
B, Perez
B, Artuch
R, Ugarte
M, Desviat
LR. Genotype-phenotype correlations in sepiapterin reductase deficiency. A splicing defect accounts for a new phenotypic variant.
Neurogenetics
2011;12:183-91.
[
PubMed: 21431957]
Bainbridge
MN, Wiszniewski
W, Murdock
DR, Friedman
J, Gonzaga-Jauregui
C, Newsham
I, Reid
JG, Fink
JK, Morgan
MB, Gingras
MC, Muzny
DM, Hoang
LD, Yousaf
S, Lupski
JR, Gibbs
RA. Whole-genome sequencing for optimized patient management.
Sci Transl Med.
2011;3:87re3.
[
PMC free article: PMC3314311] [
PubMed: 21677200]
Blau
N, Bonafe
L, Thony
B. Tetrahydrobiopterin deficiencies without hyperphenylalaniemia: diagnosis and genetics of Dopa-responsive dystonia and sepiapterin reductase deficiency.
Mol Genet Metab
2001;74:172-85.
[
PubMed: 11592814]
Blau
N, Thony
B, Renneberg
A, Arnold
LA, Hyland
K. Dihydropteridine reductase deficiency localized to the central nervous system.
J Inherit Metab Dis
1998;21:433-4.
[
PubMed: 9700606]
Blau
N, Thony
B, Renneberg
A, Penzien
JM, Hyland
K, Hoffmann
GF. Variant of dihydropteridine reductase deficiency without hyperphenylalaninaemia: effect of oral phenylalanine loading.
J Inherit Metab Dis
1999;22:216-20.
[
PubMed: 10384371]
Bonafé L. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency. In: Blau N, ed. PKU and BH4 Advances in Phenylketonuria and Tetrahydrobiopterin. Heilbronn: SPS Verlagsgesellschaft. 2006:593-611.
Bonafé
L, Thony
B, Leimbacher
W, Kierat
L, Blau
N. Diagnosis of dopa-responsive dystonia and other tetrahydrobiopterin disorders by the study of biopterin metabolism in fibroblasts.
Clin Chem
2001a;47:477-85.
[
PubMed: 11238300]
Bonafé
L, Thony
B, Penzien
JM, Czarnecki
B, Blau
N. Mutations in the sepiapterin reductase gene cause a novel tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent monoamine-neurotransmitter deficiency without hyperphenylalaninemia.
Am J Hum Genet
2001b;69:269-77.
[
PMC free article: PMC1235302] [
PubMed: 11443547]
Bräutigam
C, Weykamp
C, Hoffmann
GF, Wevers
RA. Neurotransmitter metabolites in CSF: an external quality control scheme.
J Inherit Metab Dis.
2002;25:287-98.
[
PubMed: 12227459]
Brun
L, Ngu
LH, Keng
WT, Ch'ng
GS, Choy
YS, Hwu
WL, Lee
WT, Willemsen
MA, Verbeek
MM, Wassenberg
T, Régal
L, Orcesi
S, Tonduti
D, Accorsi
P, Testard
H, Abdenur
JE, Tay
S, Allen
GF, Heales
S, Kern
I, Kato
M, Burlina
A, Manegold
C, Hoffmann
GF, Blau
N. Clinical and biochemical features of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency.
Neurology
2010;75:64-71.
[
PubMed: 20505134]
Chang
YT, Sharma
R, Marsh
JL, McPherson
JD, Bedell
JA, Knust
A, Brautigam
C, Hoffmann
GF, Hyland
K. Levodopa-responsive aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency.
Ann Neurol
2004;55:435-8.
[
PubMed: 14991824]
Clot
F, Grabli
D, Cazeneuve
C, Roze
E, Castelnau
P, Chabro
B, Landrieu
P, Nguyen
K, Ponsot
G, Abada
M, Doummar
D, Damier
P, Gil
R, Thobois
S, Ward
AJ, Hutchinson
M, Toutain
A, Picard
F, Camuzat
A, Fedirko
E, San
C, Bouteiller
D, LeGuern
E, Durr
A, Vidailhet
M, Brice
A, the French Dystonia Network. Exhaustive analysis of BH4 and dopamine biosynthesis genes in patients with Dopa-responsive dystonia.
Brain.
2009;132:1753-63.
[
PubMed: 19491146]
Concolino
D, Muzzi
G, Rapsomaniki
M, Moricca
MT, Pascale
MG, Strisciuglio
P. Serum prolactin as a tool for the follow-up of treated DHPR-deficient patients.
J Inherit Metab Dis
2008;31:S193-7.
[
PubMed: 18425437]
Dill
P, Wagner
M, Somerville
A, Thony
B, Blau
N, Weber
P.
Child neurology: paroxysmal stiffening, upward gaze, and hypotonia: hallmarks of sepiapterin reductase deficiency.
Neurology
2012;78:e29-32.
[
PubMed: 22291068]
Echenne
B, Roubertie
A, Assmann
B, Lutz
T, Penzien
JM, Thony
B, Blau
N, Hoffmann
GF. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency: clinical presentation and evaluation of long-term therapy.
Pediatr Neurol
2006;35:308-13.
[
PubMed: 17074599]
Friedman
J, Hyland
K, Blau
N, MacCollin
M. Dopa-responsive hypersomnia and mixed movement disorder due to sepiapterin reductase deficiency.
Neurology.
2006;67:2032-5.
[
PubMed: 17159114]
Friedman
J, Roze
E, Abdenur
JE, Chang
R, Gasperini
S, Saletti
V, Wali
GM, Eiroa
H, Neville
B, Felice
A, Parascandalo
R, Zafeiriou
DI, Arrabal-Fernandez
L, Dill
P, Eichler
FS, Echenne
B, Gutierrez-Solana
LG, Hoffmann
GF, Hyland
K, Kusmierska
K, Tijssen
MAJ, Lutz, T, Mazzuca
M, Penzien
J, Poll-The
BT, Sykut-Cegielska
J, Szymanska
K, Thony
B, Blau
N. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency: a treatable mimic of cerebral palsy.
Ann Neurol
2012;71:520-30.
[
PubMed: 22522443]
Furukawa
Y, Guttman
M, Wong
H, Farrell
SA, Furtado
S, Kish
SJ. Serum prolactin in symptomatic and asymptomatic dopa-responsive dystonia due to a GCH1 mutation.
Neurology
2003;61:269-70.
[
PubMed: 12874420]
Furukawa
Y, Kish
SJ. Dopa-responsive dystonia: recent advances and remaining issues to be addressed.
Mov Disord.
1999;14:709-15.
[
PubMed: 10495030]
Haruki
H, Pedersen
MG, Gorska
KI, Pojer
F, Johnsson
K. Tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis as an off-target of sulfa drugs.
Science
2013;340:987-91.
[
PubMed: 23704574]
Homma
D, Katoh
S, Tokuoka
H, Ichinose
H. The role of tetrahydrobiopterin and catecholamines in the developmental regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase level in the brain.
J Neurochem
2013;126:70-81.
[
PubMed: 23647001]
Homma
D, Sumi-Ichinose
C, Tokuoka
H, Ikemoto
K, Nomura
T, Kondo
K, Katoh
S, Ichinose
H. Partial biopterin deficiency disturbs postnatal development of the dopaminergic system in the brain.
J Biol Chem
2011;286:1445-52.
[
PMC free article: PMC3020753] [
PubMed: 21062748]
Hyland
K, Fryburg
JS, Wilson
WG, Bebin
EM, Arnold
LA, Gunasekera
RS, Jacobson
RD, Rost-Ruffner
E, Trugman
JM. Oral phenylalanine loading in dopa-responsive dystonia: a possible diagnostic test.
Neurology
1997;48:1290-7.
[
PubMed: 9153460]
Hyland
K, Surtees
RA, Heales
SJ, Bowron
A, Howells
DW, Smith
I. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of pterins and metabolites of serotonin and dopamine in a pediatric reference population.
Pediatr Res
1993;34:10-4.
[
PubMed: 7689195]
Koht
J, Rengmark
A, Opladen
T, Bjørnarå
KA, Selberg
T, Tallaksen
CM, Blau
N, Toft
M. Clinical and genetic studies in a family with a novel mutation in the sepiapterin reductase gene.
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl.
2014;(198):7-12.
[
PubMed: 24588500]
Kusmierska
K, Jansen
EE, Jakobs
C, Szymanska
K, Malunowicz
E, Meilei
D, Thony
B, Blau
N, Tryfon
J, Rokicki
D, Pronicka
E, Sykut-Cegielska
J. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency in a 2-year-old girl with incomplete response to treatment during short-term follow-up.
J Inherit Metab Dis
2009;32
Suppl 1:S5-10.
[
PubMed: 19130291]
Leu-Semenescu
S, Arnulf
I, Decaix
C, Moussa
F, Clot
F, Boniol
C, Touitou
Y, Levy
R, Vidailhet
M, Roze
E. Sleep and rhythm consequences of a genetically induced loss of serotonin.
Sleep.
2010;33:307-14.
[
PMC free article: PMC2831424] [
PubMed: 20337188]
Leuzzi
V, Carducci
C, Carducci
C, Cardona
F, Artiola
C, Antonozzi
I.
Autosomal dominant GTP-CH deficiency presenting as a dopa-responsive myoclonus-dystonia syndrome.
Neurology.
2002;59:1241-3.
[
PubMed: 12391354]
Leuzzi
V, Carducci
C, Tolve
M, Giannini
MT, Angeloni
A, Carducci
C. Very early pattern of movement disorders in sepiapterin reductase deficiency.
Neurology
2013;81:2141-2.
[
PubMed: 24212389]
Lohmann
E, Köroğlu
Ç, Hanagasi
HA, Dursun
B, Tasan
E, Tolun
A. A homozygous frameshift mutation of sepiapterin reductase gene causing parkinsonism with onset in childhood.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord
2012;18:191-3.
[
PubMed: 22018912]
Mazzuca M, Christa L, Damaj L, Plouin P, Dauvilliers Y, Rabier D, Clot F, Odent S, Benoist JF, De Lonlay P. Dopa-responsive hypersomnia in combined sepiapterin reductase (SR) and methyl malonyl CoA epimerase (MCEE) deficiency. Istanbul, Turkey: Annual Symposium of the Society for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism; 2010.
Neville
B.
Congenital DOPA-responsive disorders: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the cerebral palsies?
Dev Med Child Neurol.
2007;49:85.
[
PubMed: 17253992]
Neville
BG, Parascandalo
R, Farrugia
R, Felice
A. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency: a congenital dopa-responsive motor and cognitive disorder.
Brain.
2005;128:2291-6.
[
PubMed: 16049044]
Nygaard
TG, Marsden
CD, Fahn
S. Dopa-responsive dystonia: long-term treatment response and prognosis.
Neurology.
1991;41:174-81.
[
PubMed: 1899474]
Okuno
S, Fujisawa
H.
A new mechanism for regulation of tyrosine 3-monooxygenase by end product and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.
J Biol Chem
1985;260:2633-5.
[
PubMed: 2857715]
Richards
S, Aziz
N, Bale
S, Bick
D, Das
S, Gastier-Foster
J, Grody
WW, Hegde
M, Lyon
E, Spector
E, Voelkerding
K, Rehm
HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Genet Med.
2015;17:405-24.
[
PMC free article: PMC4544753] [
PubMed: 25741868]
Steinberger
D, Blau
N, Goriuonov
D, Bitsch
J, Zuker
M, Hummel
S, Muller
U.
Heterozygous mutation in 5'-untranslated region of sepiapterin reductase gene (SPR) in a patient with dopa-responsive dystonia.
Neurogenetics
2004;5:187-90.
[
PubMed: 15241655]
Takazawa
C, Fujimoto
K, Homma
D, Sumi-Ichinose
C, Nomura
T, Ichinose
H, Katoh
S.
A brain-specific decrease of the tyrosine hydroxylase protein in sepiapterin reductase-null mice--as a mouse model for Parkinson's disease.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
2008;367:787-92.
[
PubMed: 18201550]
Thibert
R, Hyland
K, Chiles
J, Steinberg
S, Eichler
F. Levodopa response reveals sepiapterin reductase deficiency in a female heterozygote with adrenoleukodystrophy.
JIMD Rep
2012;3:79-82.
[
PMC free article: PMC3509860] [
PubMed: 23430877]
Trender-Gerhard
I, Sweeney
MG, Schwingenschuh
P, Mir
P, Edwards
MJ, Gerhard
A, Polke
JM, Hanna
MG, Davis
MB, Wood
NW, Bhatia
KP. Autosomal-dominant GTPCH1-deficient DRD: clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of 34 patients.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
2009;80:839-45.
[
PubMed: 19332422]
Verbeek
MM, Willemsen
MA, Wevers
RA, Lagerwerf
AJ, Abeling
NGGM, Blau
N, Thony
B, Vargiami
E, Zafeiriou
DI. Two Greek siblings with sepiapterin reductase deficiency.
Mol Genet Metab
2008;94:403-9.
[
PubMed: 18502672]
Wali
GM, Thony
B, Blau
N. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency: two Indian siblings with unusual clinical features.
Mov Disord.
2010;25:954-5.
[
PubMed: 20222129]
Watanabe
T, Matsubara
S. Good obstetric outcome in a patient with Segawa disease.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr
2012;70:559-60.
[
PubMed: 22836471]
Woody
RC, Brewster
MA. Adverse effects of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in a child with dihydropteridine reductase deficiency.
Dev Med Child Neurol
1990;32:639-42
[
PubMed: 2391014]
Wyatt
SS, Gill
RS. An absolute contraindication to nitrous oxide.
Anaesthesia
1999;54:307.
[
PubMed: 10364889]
Suggested Reading
Friedman J, Opladen T. L-dopa-responsive dystonia syndromes. In: Hoffmann G, Blau N, eds. Congenital Neurotransmitter Disorders: A Clinical Approach. New York, NY; Nova Biomedical. 2014:17-38.