U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Needle or Open Fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s Contracture: A Review of the Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness – An Update [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2013 Nov 11.

Cover of Needle or Open Fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s Contracture: A Review of the Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness – An Update

Needle or Open Fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s Contracture: A Review of the Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness – An Update [Internet].

Show details

REFERENCES

1.
Dibenedetti DB, Nguyen D, Zografos L, Ziemiecki R, Zhou X. Prevalence, incidence, and treatments of Dupuytren's disease in the United States: results from a population-based study. Hand (N Y) [Internet] 2011 Jun;6(2):149–58. [cited 2012 Oct 31]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092891. [PMC free article: PMC3092891] [PubMed: 21776198]
2.
Mafi R, Hindocha S, Khan W. Recent surgical and medical advances in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease - a systematic review of the literature. Open Orthop J [Internet] 2012;6:77–82. [cited 2012 Oct 17]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293169. [PMC free article: PMC3293169] [PubMed: 22431952]
3.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol [Internet] 2007;7:10. [cited 2013 Nov 5]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC1810543/pdf/1471-2288-7-10.pdf. [PMC free article: PMC1810543] [PubMed: 17302989]
4.
Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health [Internet] 1998 Jun;52(6):377–384. [cited 2013 Nov 5]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC1756728/pdf/v052p00377.pdf. [PMC free article: PMC1756728] [PubMed: 9764259]
5.
Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ [Internet] 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275–283. [cited 2013 Sep 26]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC2351717/pdf/bmj00553-0039.pdf. [PMC free article: PMC2351717] [PubMed: 8704542]
6.
Chen NC, Srinivasan RC, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of outcomes of fasciotomy, aponeurotomy, and collagenase treatments for Dupuytren's contracture. Hand (N Y) [Internet] 2011 Sep;6(3):250–255. [cited 2012 Oct 17]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153627. [PMC free article: PMC3153627] [PubMed: 22942847]
7.
van Rijssen AL, ter Linden H, Werker PM. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial on treatment in Dupuytren's disease: percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):469–477. [PubMed: 21987045]
8.
van Rijssen AL, Gerbrandy FS, ter Linden H, Klip H, Werker PM. A comparison of the direct outcomes of percutaneous needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease: a 6-week follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 May;31(5):717–725. [PubMed: 16713831]
9.
Chen NC, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Cost-effectiveness of open partial fasciectomy, needle aponeurotomy, and collagenase injection for dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Nov;36(11):1826–1834. [PubMed: 21981831]
10.
Baltzer H, Binhammer PA. Cost-effectiveness in the management of Dupuytren's contracture. A Canadian cost-utility analysis of current and future management strategies. Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1094–1100. [PubMed: 23908426]
11.
Herrera FA, Benhaim P, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Azari K, Mitchell S. Cost comparison of open fasciectomy versus percutaneous needle aponeurotomy for treatment of Dupuytren contracture. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(4):454–456. [PubMed: 23486126]
12.
Howick J. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - levels of medicine [Internet]. Oxford (UK): University of Oxford; 2009. [cited 2012 Oct 30]. Available from: http://www​.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025.
13.
Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb;84-A(2):208–215. [PubMed: 11861726]
14.
Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002 Oct;15(4):347–354. [PubMed: 12449349]
Copyright © 2013 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK195710
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (495K)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...