U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Ketorolac for Pain Management: A Review of the Clinical Evidence [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2014 Jun 30.

Cover of Ketorolac for Pain Management: A Review of the Clinical Evidence

Ketorolac for Pain Management: A Review of the Clinical Evidence [Internet].

Show details

APPENDIX 3Summary of Critical Appraisal of Included Clinical and Cost Studies

StrengthsLimitations
SIGN505
Dental Pain
Jena et al., 20136
  • Appropriate and clearly focused research question
  • Initial pain was similar between groups at baseline
  • Inclusion criteria, study interventions, outcome measures clearly described
  • Randomization and concealment methods were not adequately described
  • Blinding procedures were not adequately described
  • Baseline patient characteristics were not well reported
  • Unclear whether all patients completed the study and if the analysis was based on intention to treat.
  • None of the results demonstrated statistical significance
Aggarwal, 20107
  • Appropriate and clearly focused research question
  • Only difference between groups is treatment under investigation
  • Randomization and concealment methods were well described
  • Blinding procedures were well described
  • Baseline patient characteristics were reported
  • Power and sample size calculation provided
  • Inclusion criteria, study interventions, outcome measures clearly described
  • Low discontinuation rate
  • None of the results demonstrated statistical significance
Non-Dental/Non-Cancer
Ortiz, 20108
  • Appropriate and clearly focused research question
  • Randomization and concealment methods were not adequately described
  • Blinding procedures were not adequately described
  • Baseline patient characteristics were not well reported
  • Unclear how many patients were originally randomized in the study
  • Statistical analyses methods not provided
  • Exclusion criteria not provided
Kaeding et al., 20049
  • Appropriate and clearly focused research question
  • Randomization methods were well described
  • Baseline patient characteristics were reported
  • Patients were not blinded, only nurse assessor was blinded
  • Statistical measures of dispersion and confidence intervals were not provided
  • None of the results demonstrated statistical significance
  • Only exclusion criteria was specified
Copyright © 2014 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Copyright: This report contains CADTH copyright material and may contain material in which a third party owns copyright. This report may be used for the purposes of research or private study only. It may not be copied, posted on a web site, redistributed by email or stored on an electronic system without the prior written permission of CADTH or applicable copyright owner.

Links: This report may contain links to other information available on the websites of third parties on the Internet. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third party sites is governed by the owners’ own terms and conditions.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK254123

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (453K)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...