U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Galdas P, Darwin Z, Fell J, et al. A systematic review and metaethnography to identify how effective, cost-effective, accessible and acceptable self-management support interventions are for men with long-term conditions (SELF-MAN). Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Aug. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 3.34.)

Cover of A systematic review and metaethnography to identify how effective, cost-effective, accessible and acceptable self-management support interventions are for men with long-term conditions (SELF-MAN)

A systematic review and metaethnography to identify how effective, cost-effective, accessible and acceptable self-management support interventions are for men with long-term conditions (SELF-MAN).

Show details

Appendix 12Quality-of-life instruments used by quantitative studies

TABLE 48

Quality-of-life instrument used by male-only, mixed-sex and female-only groups (analysis 2)

Instrument nameAbbreviationOverall domain or subscaleDirection of responseTrials using this scale
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – GeneralFACT-GHRQoLPositive scores indicate better statusBourke et al. 2011;72 Jarden et al. 2009;167 Rogers et al. 2009;177 Donnelly et al. 2011;164 Wang et al. 2011;172 Cadmus et al. 2009;158 Mutrie et al. 2007147
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30EORTC QLQ-C30HRQoLPositive scores indicate better statusCulos-Reed et al. 2010;80 Johansson et al. 2008;148 Adamsen et al. 2009168
Short Form health survey 36SF-36 PHRQoL – physical compositePositive scores indicate better statusDaubenmier 2006 et al.;49 Bennett et al. 2007;154 Fillion et al. 2008;181 Carmack Taylor et al. 2006;66 Lepore et al. 2003;59 Parker et al. 2009;64 Demark-Wahnefried et al. 2006;150 Coultas et al. 2005155
Spitzer Quality of Life IndexSpitzer IndexHRQoLPositive scores indicate better statusKoukouvou et al. 2004;91 Cheville et al. 2010149
Health Status Questionnaire v2.0HSQHRQoL – general health subscalePositive scores indicate better statusGourley et al. 199854
Sickness Impact ProfileSIPHRQoLNegative scores indicate better statusEmery et al. 1998165
Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression ScaleCES-DDepressionNegative scores indicate better statusCulos-Reed et al. 2010;80 Carmack Taylor et al. 2006;66 Cadmus et al. 2009;158 Carmack et al. 1995;166 Chandwani et al. 2010;159 Danhauer et al. 2009;169 Gifford et al. 1998;53 Lepore et al. 200359
Beck Depression InventoryBDIDepressionNegative scores indicate better statusKouidi et al. 1997;175 Donnelly et al. 2011;164 Dominique et al. 2010;156 Mutrie et al. 2007;147 Raghavendra et al. 2007;160 Heckman and Carlson 2007;162 Stein et al. 2007174
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleHADSDepression subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusKoukouvou et al. 2004;91 Berglund et al. 2007;89 Adamsen et al. 2009;168 Jarden et al. 2009;167 Banerjee et al. 2007;163 Johansson et al. 2008148
Self-Rating Depression Scale–DepressionNegative scores indicate better statusvan Vilsteren et al. 2005151
Profile of Mood StatesPOMSDepression subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusPuig et al. 2006152
Geriatric Depression ScaleGDSDepressionNegative scores indicate better statusWeber et al. 2004;68 Weber et al. 200769
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleHADSAnxiety subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusBerglund et al. 2007;89 Koukouvou et al. 2004;91 Adamsen et al. 2009;168 Jarden et al. 2009;167 Banerjee et al. 2007;163 Johansson et al. 2008148
State–Trait Anxiety IndexSTAIAnxietyNegative scores indicate better statusCohen et al. 2004;153 Courneya et al. 2003;161 Chandwani et al. 2010;159 Raghavendra et al. 2007;160 Carmack Taylor et al. 200666
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – FatigueFACT-FFatigue subscalePositive scores indicate better statusBourke et al. 2011;72 Courneya et al. 2003;171 Courneya et al. 2003;161 Jarden et al. 2009;167 Danhauer et al. 2009;169 Mutrie et al. 2007;147 Rogers et al. 2009177
Fatigue Severity ScaleFSSFatigueNegative scores indicate better statusCulos-Reed et al. 201080
Chronic Respiratory QuestionnaireCRQFatigue subscalePositive scores indicate better statusGuell et al. 2000;81 Puente-Maestu et al. 200088
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30EORTC QLQ-C30Fatigue subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusAdamsen et al. 2009;168 Thorsen et al. 2005170
Brief Fatigue InventoryBFIFatigueNegative scores indicate better statusCohen et al. 2004153
Piper Fatigue ScalePFSFatigueNegative scores indicate better statusMock et al. 2005173
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness TherapyFACITFatigue subscalePositive scores indicate better statusMoadel et al. 2007278
Fatigue Scale–FatigueNegative scores indicate better statusGifford et al. 199853
Profile of Mood StatesPOMSFatigue subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusPinto et al. 2005279
Perceived Stress ScalePSSStressNegative scores indicate better statusDaubenmier et al. 2006;49 Gifford et al. 199853
Derogatis stress profile–Relaxation subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusBennett et al. 199171
Brief Pain InventoryBPIPainNegative scores indicate better statusCarmack Taylor et al. 200676
Medical Outcomes StudyMOSPain severity subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusGifford et al. 199853
Symptom self-efficacy scale–Self-efficacyPositive scores indicate better statusGifford et al. 199853
Standford Inventory for Cancer Patient AdjustmentSICPASelf-efficacyPositive scores indicate better statusWeber et al. 2004;68 Weber et al. 200769
Coping self-efficacy scale–Self-efficacyPositive scores indicate better statusHeckman and Carlson 2007162
Diabetes emotional distress scale–DistressNegative scores indicate better statusHeisler et al. 201056
Brief Symptom InventoryBSIPsychiatric distress subscaleNegative scores indicate better statusLucy 199460
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. This work was produced by Galdas et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK311070
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (3.9M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...