NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, et al. The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2018 Jun. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 6.20.)
![Cover of The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study](/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/bookshelf/thumbs/th-ukhsdr0620-lrg.png)
The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study.
Show detailsReception staff | Nurses | GPs/primary care physicians | Practice managers/service managers | Others (secondary care clinicians, policy-makers, professional bodies) | Patients (about them and by them) | ‘Disadvantaged’ patients/groups of patients | Carers (including parents) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Telephone | ||||||||
Positive | ||||||||
Negative | ||||||||
Positive speculation | ||||||||
Negative speculation | ||||||||
Positive | ||||||||
Negative | ||||||||
Positive speculation | ||||||||
Negative speculation |
- Matrix template for the conceptual review - The potential of alternatives to fac...Matrix template for the conceptual review - The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...