U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Shaw L, Nunns M, Briscoe S, et al. Experiences of the ‘Nearest Relative’ provisions in the compulsory detention of people under the Mental Health Act: a rapid systematic review. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2018 Dec. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 6.39.)

Cover of Experiences of the ‘Nearest Relative’ provisions in the compulsory detention of people under the Mental Health Act: a rapid systematic review

Experiences of the ‘Nearest Relative’ provisions in the compulsory detention of people under the Mental Health Act: a rapid systematic review.

Show details

References

1.
Great Britain. Mental Health Act 1983. London: The Stationery Office; 1983.
2.
Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). Code of Practice: Mental Health Act 1983. London: DHSC; 2015.
3.
Great Britain. Mental Health Act 1959. London: The Stationery Office; 1959.
4.
Rapaport J. A matter of principle: the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 and proposals for legislative reform. J Soc Welf Fam Law 2004;26:377–96. 10.1080/0964906042000323471 [CrossRef]
5.
Great Britain. Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986. London: The Stationery Office; 1986.
6.
Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
7.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. The Human Rights Act. Equality and Human Rights Commission. 1998. URL: www​.equalityhumanrights​.com/en/human-rights/human-rights-act (accessed 6 March 2018).
8.
Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models. London: DHSC; 1999.
9.
Great Britain. Mental Capacity Act 2005. London: The Stationery Office; 2005.
10.
Social Care Institute for Excellence. Mental Capacity Act 2005 at a Glance. Social Care Institute for Excellence. 2009. URL: www​.scie.org.uk/mca/introduction​/mental-capacity-act-2005-at-a-glance (accessed 1 March 2018).
11.
Great Britain. Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. London: The Stationery Office; 2003.
12.
Great Britain. Mental Health Act (Scotland) 1984. London: The Stationery Office; 1984.
13.
Scottish Government. New Directions: Report on the Review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2001.
14.
Great Britain. Mental Health Act. London: The Stationery Office; 2007.
15.
McDonald B. Information Sharing and Mental Health: Guidance to Support Information Sharing by Mental Health Services. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2009.
16.
Great Britain. Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010. London: The Stationery Office; 2010.
17.
Welsh Government. Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010. Cardiff: Welsh Government; 2012.
18.
NHS England. Five Year Forward View. Leeds: NHS England; 2014.
19.
Care Quality Commission (CQC). Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2015/16. Newcastle upon Tyne: CQC; 2016.
20.
Mental Health Alliance. A Mental Health Act Fit for Tomorrow: an Agenda for Reform. London: Mental Health Alliance; 2017. URL: www​.rethink.org/media​/2854020/a-mental-health-act-fit-for-tomorrow.pdf (accessed 1 March 2018).
21.
Wessely S. Independent Review of the Mental Health Act. 2017. URL: www​.gov.uk/government​/groups/independent-review-of-the-mental-health-act (accessed 30 April 2018).
22.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: CRD, University of York; 2009.
23.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. 10.1136/bmj.b2535 [PMC free article: PMC2714657] [PubMed: 19622551] [CrossRef]
24.
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:181. 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 [PMC free article: PMC3552766] [PubMed: 23185978] [CrossRef]
25.
Wong SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107:311–16. [PubMed: 15360825]
26.
Stern C, Jordan Z, McArthur A. Developing the review question and inclusion criteria. Am J Nurs 2014;114:53–6. 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000445689.67800.86 [PubMed: 24681476] [CrossRef]
27.
Wallace A, Croucher K, Quilgars D, Baldwin S. Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policy. Policy Polit 2004;32:455–70. 10.1332/0305573042009444 [CrossRef]
28.
Booth A, Carroll C. How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of ‘best fit’ framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:700–8. 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003642 [PMC free article: PMC4680127] [PubMed: 26306609] [CrossRef]
29.
Dixon-Woods M. Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Med 2011;9:39. 10.1186/1741-7015-9-39 [PMC free article: PMC3095548] [PubMed: 21492447] [CrossRef]
30.
Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:21. 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21 [PMC free article: PMC2374791] [PubMed: 18416812] [CrossRef]
31.
Rapaport J. The Nearest Relative Under the Mental Health Act 1983: a Relative Affair. PhD thesis. Cambridge: Anglia Polytechnic (now Anglia Ruskin University); 2002.
32.
Berzins KM. Mental Health Service Users’, Carers’ and Professionals’ Perceptions of the Named Person Provisions of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. PhD thesis. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2009.
33.
Dawson A, Ferguson I, Mackay K, Maxwell M. An Assessment of the Operation of the Named Person Role and its Interaction with Other Forms of Patient Representation. Edinburgh: QPS; 2009.
34.
Banks LC, Stroud J, Doughty K. Community treatment orders: exploring the paradox of personalisation under compulsion. Health Soc Care Community 2016;24:e181–90. 10.1111/hsc.12268 [PubMed: 26290439] [CrossRef]
35.
Barnes M, Davis A, Tew J. Valuing experience: users’ experiences of compulsion under the Mental Health Act 1983. Ment Health Rev 2000;5:11–14. 10.1108/13619322200000024 [CrossRef]
36.
Berzins KM, Atkinson JM. The views of policy influencers and mental health officers concerning the Named Person provisions of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. J Ment Health 2010;19:452–60. 10.3109/09638231003728117 [PubMed: 20836692] [CrossRef]
37.
Berzins KM, Atkinson JM. Service users’ and carers’ views of the Named Person provisions under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. J Ment Health 2009;18:207–15. 10.1080/09638230802523021 [CrossRef]
38.
Campbell J. Stakeholders’ views of legal and advice services for people admitted to psychiatric hospital. J Soc Welf Fam Law 2008;30:219–32. 10.1080/09649060802550659 [CrossRef]
39.
Campbell J, Wilson G, Britton F, Hamilton B, Hughes P, Manktelow R. The management and supervision of approved social workers: aspects of law, policy and practice. J Soc Welf Fam Law 2001;23:155–72. 10.1080/01418030122030 [CrossRef]
40.
Canvin K, Rugkåsa J, Sinclair J, Burns T. Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014;49:1873–82. 10.1007/s00127-014-0906-0 [PubMed: 24927948] [CrossRef]
41.
De Maynard V. An ethnographic study of black men within an inner London area to elicit relatedness between black human condition and the onset of severe mental illness: what about the black human condition? Int J Ment Health 2007;36:26–45. 10.2753/IMH0020-7411360403 [CrossRef]
42.
The Evidence Centre. No Voice Unheard, No Right Ignored: Key Themes from the Consultation Responses. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2015.
43.
Gault I. Service-user and carer perspectives on compliance and compulsory treatment in community mental health services. Health Soc Care Community 2009;17:504–13. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00847.x [PubMed: 19456902] [CrossRef]
44.
Gault I, Gallagher A, Chambers M. Perspectives on medicine adherence in service users and carers with experience of legally sanctioned detention and medication: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adher 2013;7:787–99. 10.2147/PPA.S44894 [PMC free article: PMC3749064] [PubMed: 23990714] [CrossRef]
45.
Henderson J. Experiences of ‘care’ in mental health. J Adult Prot 2002;4:34–45. 10.1108/14668203200200020 [CrossRef]
46.
Jankovic J, Yeeles K, Katsakou C, Amos T, Morriss R, Rose D, et al. Family caregivers’ experiences of involuntary psychiatric hospital admissions of their relatives – a qualitative study. PLOS ONE 2011;6:e25425. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025425 [PMC free article: PMC3192057] [PubMed: 22022393] [CrossRef]
47.
Manktelow R, Hughes P, Britton F, Campbell J, Hamilton B, Wilson G. The experience and practice of approved social workers in Northern Ireland. Br J Soc Work 2002;32:443–61. 10.1093/bjsw/32.4.443 [CrossRef]
48.
Marriott S. Research into the Mental Health Act: a qualitative study of the views of those using or affected by it. J Ment Health 2001;10:33–9. 10.1080/09638230124934 [CrossRef]
49.
Pinfold V, Farmer P, Rapaport J, Bellringer S, Huxley P, Murray J, et al. Positive and Inclusive? Effective Ways for Professionals to Involve Carers in Information Sharing. London: National Coordinating Centre for the Service Delivery and Organisation; 2004.
50.
Rabiee F, Smith P. Being understood, being respected: an evaluation of the statutory and voluntary mental health service provision in Birmingham, UK. Int J Ment Health Prom 2013;15:162–77. 10.1080/14623730.2013.824163 [CrossRef]
51.
Rapaport J. Rise and demise of the nearest relative. Professional Social Work 1999;14–15.
52.
Rapaport J. The ghost of the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 – past, present and future. J Ment Health Law 2003;9:51–65.
53.
Rapaport J. Reflections on ‘A Relative Affair’: the Nearest Relative Under the Mental Health Act 1983. London: Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London; 2012.
54.
Ridley J, Hunter S. Subjective experiences of compulsory treatment from a qualitative study of early implementation of the Mental Health (Care & Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. Health Soc Care Community 2013;21:509–18. 10.1111/hsc.12041 [PubMed: 23551766] [CrossRef]
55.
Ridley J, Hunter S, Rosengard A. Partners in care?: views and experiences of carers from a cohort study of the early implementation of the Mental Health (Care & Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. Health Soc Care Community 2010;18:474–82. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00920.x [PubMed: 20491964] [CrossRef]
56.
Ridley J, Rosengard A, Hunter S. Experiences of the early implementation of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act, 2003. Health Community Care Res Find 2009;80.
57.
Rugkåsa J, Canvin K. Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:762. 10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z [PMC free article: PMC5698997] [PubMed: 29162096] [CrossRef]
58.
Smith MS. ‘Only connect’ ‘Nearest Relative’s’ experiences of mental health act assessments. J Soc Work Pract 2015;29:339–53. 10.1080/02650533.2015.1057802 [CrossRef]
59.
Stroud J, Banks L, Doughty K. Community treatment orders: learning from experiences of service users, practitioners and Nearest Relatives. J Ment Health 2015;24:88–92. 10.3109/09638237.2014.998809 [PubMed: 25642950] [CrossRef]
60.
Stroud J, Doughty K, Banks L, Hayward M, Ashdown H, Sherlock M, et al. An Exploration of Service User and Practitioner Experiences of Community Treatment Orders. Brighton: University of Brighton; 2013.
61.
Taylor AJ, Lawton-Smith S, Bullmore H. Supervised community treatment: does it facilitate social inclusion? A perspective from approved mental health professionals (AMHPs). Ment Health Soc Inclus 2013;17:43–8. 10.1108/20428301311305304 [CrossRef]
62.
Vicary S. An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Impact of Professional Background on Role Fulfilment: A Study of Approved Mental Health Practice. PhD thesis. Manchester: University of Manchester; 2016.
63.
Social Service Inspectorate. Detained. SSI Inspection of Compulsory Mental Health Admissions. Manchester: Department of Health and Social Care; 2001.
64.
Scottish Government. Scotland Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2015. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office; 2015.
65.
Rethink Mental Illness. Planning Your Care: Advanced Statements. Rethink Mental Illness; 2018. URL: www​.rethink.org/living-with-mental-illness​/rights-restrictions​/planning-your-care-advance-statements (accessed 19 September 2018).
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Shaw et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Bookshelf ID: NBK534752
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (757K)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...