U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.280C>T (p.Pro94Ser) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Jul 31, 2024
Review status:
criteria provided, conflicting classifications
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000254706.18

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.280C>T (p.Pro94Ser)]

NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.280C>T (p.Pro94Ser)

Gene:
BRCA2:BRCA2 DNA repair associated [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
13q13.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.280C>T (p.Pro94Ser)
HGVS:
  • NC_000013.11:g.32319289C>T
  • NG_012772.3:g.8810C>T
  • NG_017006.2:g.1075G>A
  • NM_000059.4:c.280C>TMANE SELECT
  • NP_000050.2:p.Pro94Ser
  • NP_000050.3:p.Pro94Ser
  • LRG_293t1:c.280C>T
  • LRG_293:g.8810C>T
  • LRG_293p1:p.Pro94Ser
  • NC_000013.10:g.32893426C>T
  • NM_000059.3:c.280C>T
  • U43746.1:n.508C>T
  • p.P94S
Nucleotide change:
508C>T
Protein change:
P94S
Links:
dbSNP: rs80358531
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs80358531
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000059.4:c.280C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000694632Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Likely benign
(Aug 24, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (6)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link,

SCV002066668Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Nov 23, 2020)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV005090007Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Likely benign
(Jul 31, 2024)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlinenonot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Nothing to display

See all PubMed Citations (7)

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV000694632.4

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (6)

Description

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.280C>T (p.Pro94Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.8e-05 in 251082 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4.8e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.280C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer and HBOC (example, Caux-Moncoutier_2009, Ortiz_2016, Maksimenko_2018, Guindalini_2022). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been observed (BRCA1 c.5266dup, p.Gln1756fsX74 in UMD database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. This variant had no effect in a study assessing allelic imbalance as an indirect measure of the impact of out-of-frame defects leading to reductions in the levels of mutant mRNA cleared through NMD (example, Caux-Moncoutier 2009). Consistent with this result, a second study has shown variant has no effect on splicing and classified the variant as benign (Thomassen_ 2022). This supports the notion that this variant has no effect on splicing. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19471317, 21120943, 29928469, 29659569, 35979650, 35264596). Eleven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as likely benign (n=4) and VUS (n=7). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago, SCV002066668.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

DNA sequence analysis of the BRCA2 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.280C>T, in exon 3 that results in an amino acid change, p.Pro94Ser. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with BRCA2-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.014% in the Latino sub-population (dbSNP rs80358531). The p.Pro94Ser change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BRCA2 protein that is known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Pro94Ser substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Pro94Ser change remains unknown at this time.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlinenonot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, SCV005090007.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Oct 13, 2024