U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.76C>T (p.Pro26Ser) AND Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Apr 27, 2023
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV001064639.9

Allele description

NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.76C>T (p.Pro26Ser)

Gene:
TGFBR2:transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
3p24.1
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.76C>T (p.Pro26Ser)
HGVS:
  • NC_000003.12:g.30606959C>T
  • NG_007490.1:g.5458C>T
  • NM_001024847.3:c.76C>T
  • NM_001407126.1:c.76C>T
  • NM_001407127.1:c.76C>T
  • NM_001407130.1:c.76C>T
  • NM_001407133.1:c.-208C>T
  • NM_001407134.1:c.-86C>T
  • NM_001407135.1:c.-133C>T
  • NM_001407136.1:c.-218C>T
  • NM_001407137.1:c.76C>T
  • NM_001407138.1:c.76C>T
  • NM_001407139.1:c.76C>T
  • NM_003242.6:c.76C>TMANE SELECT
  • NP_001020018.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001020018.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001394055.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001394056.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001394059.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001394066.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001394067.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_001394068.1:p.Pro26Ser
  • NP_003233.4:p.Pro26Ser
  • LRG_779t1:c.76C>T
  • LRG_779t2:c.76C>T
  • LRG_779:g.5458C>T
  • LRG_779p1:p.Pro26Ser
  • LRG_779p2:p.Pro26Ser
  • NC_000003.11:g.30648451C>T
  • NM_001024847.2:c.76C>T
  • NM_003242.5:c.76C>T
Protein change:
P26S
Links:
dbSNP: rs764160271
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs764160271
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001024847.3:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001407126.1:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001407127.1:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001407130.1:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001407137.1:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001407138.1:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001407139.1:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_003242.6:c.76C>T - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]

Condition(s)

Name:
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (TAAD)
Synonyms:
Thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection; Thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections
Identifiers:
MONDO: MONDO:0019625; MedGen: C4707243; Orphanet: 91387; OMIM: PS607086

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV001229550Invitae
criteria provided, single submitter

(Invitae Variant Classification Sherloc (09022015))
Uncertain significance
(Dec 22, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV001358262Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Apr 27, 2023)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV003912862Ambry Genetics
criteria provided, single submitter

(Ambry Variant Classification Scheme 2023)
Uncertain significance
(Nov 30, 2022)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, Kobayashi Y, Patil N, Thusberg J, Westbrook M; Invitae Clinical Genomics Group., Topper S.

Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
28492532
PMCID:
PMC5632818

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee..

Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25741868
PMCID:
PMC4544753

Details of each submission

From Invitae, SCV001229550.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 26 of the TGFBR2 protein (p.Pro26Ser). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TGFBR2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 858705). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TGFBR2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health, SCV001358262.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

This missense variant replaces proline with serine at codon 26 of the TGFBR2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with TGFBR2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 4/252882 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Ambry Genetics, SCV003912862.2

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

The p.P26S variant (also known as c.76C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the TGFBR2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 76. The proline at codon 26 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: May 7, 2024