Imipramine response
- Synonyms
- Tofranil response
Summary
Available tests
Genes See tests for all associated and related genes
Also known as: CPCJ, CYP2C, CYPIIC17, CYPIIC19, P450C2C, P450IIC19, CYP2C19
Summary: cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19Also known as: CPD6, CYP2D, CYP2D7AP, CYP2D7BP, CYP2D7P2, CYP2D8P2, CYP2DL1, CYPIID6, P450-DB1, P450C2D, P450DB1, CYP2D6
Summary: cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily D member 6 (gene/pseudogene)
Therapeutic recommendations
From Medical Genetics SummariesThis section contains excerpted1information on gene-based dosing recommendations. Neither this section nor other parts of this review contain the complete recommendations from the sources.
2016 Statement from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The biochemical activity of the drug metabolizing isozyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (debrisoquin hydroxylase) is reduced in a subset of the Caucasian population (about 7% to 10% of Caucasians are so-called “poor metabolizers”); reliable estimates of the prevalence of reduced P450 2D6 isozyme activity among Asian, African, and other populations are not yet available. Poor metabolizers have higher than expected plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) when given usual doses. Depending on the fraction of drug metabolized by P450 2D6, the increase in plasma concentration may be small, or quite large (8-fold increase in plasma AUC of the TCA).
In addition, certain drugs inhibit the activity of this isozyme and make normal metabolizers resemble poor metabolizers. An individual who is stable on a given dose of TCA may become abruptly toxic when given one of these inhibiting drugs as concomitant therapy. The drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450 2D6 include some that are not metabolized by the enzyme (quinidine; cimetidine) and many that are substrates for P450 2D6 (many other antidepressants, phenothiazines, and the Type 1C antiarrhythmics propafenone and flecainide). While all the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), e.g., fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine, inhibit P450 2D6, they may vary in the extent of inhibition. The extent to which SSRI-TCA interaction may pose clinical problems will depend on the degree of inhibition and the pharmacokinetics of the SSRI involved. Nevertheless, caution is indicated in the co-administration of TCAs with any of the SSRIs and also in switching from one class to the other. Of particular importance, sufficient time must elapse before initiating TCA treatment in a patient being withdrawn from fluoxetine, given the long half-life of the parent and active metabolite (at least 5 weeks may be necessary).
Concomitant use of tricyclic antidepressants with drugs that can inhibit cytochrome P450 2D6 may require lower doses than usually prescribed for either the tricyclic antidepressant or the other drug. Furthermore, whenever one of these other drugs is withdrawn from co-therapy, an increased dose of tricyclic antidepressant may be required. It is desirable to monitor TCA plasma levels whenever a TCA is going to be co-administered with another drug known to be an inhibitor of P450 2D6.
Please review the complete therapeutic recommendations that are located here: (1).
2016 Statement from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC):
Because the TCAs have comparable pharmacokinetic properties, it may be reasonable to extrapolate this guideline to other TCAs including clomipramine, desipramine, doxepin, imipramine, and trimipramine, with the acknowledgement that there are fewer data supporting dose adjustments for these drugs than for amitriptyline or nortriptyline. […]
CYP2D6 dosing recommendations.
[…]. The recommended starting dose of amitriptyline or nortriptyline does not need adjustment for those with genotypes predictive of CYP2D6 normal metabolism. A 25% reduction of the recommended dose may be considered for CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers. The strength of this recommendation is classified as “moderate” because patients with a CYP2D6 activity score of 1.0 are inconsistently categorized as intermediate or normal metabolizers in the literature, making these studies difficult to evaluate.
CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers have a higher probability of failing amitriptyline or nortriptyline pharmacotherapy due to subtherapeutic plasma concentrations, and alternate agents are preferred. There are documented cases of CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers receiving large doses of nortriptyline in order to achieve therapeutic concentrations. However, very high plasma concentrations of the nortriptyline hydroxy-metabolite were present, which may increase the risk for cardiotoxicity. If a tricyclic is warranted, there are insufficient data in the literature to calculate a starting dose for a patient with CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer status, and therapeutic drug monitoring is strongly recommended. Adverse effects are more likely in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers due to elevated tricyclic plasma concentrations; therefore, alternate agents are preferred. If a tricyclic is warranted, consider a 50% reduction of the usual dose, and therapeutic drug monitoring is strongly recommended.
CYP2C19 dosing recommendations.
[…]. The usual starting dose of amitriptyline may be used in CYP2C19 normal and intermediate metabolizers. Although CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers would be expected to have a modest increase in the ratio of amitriptyline to nortriptyline plasma concentrations, the evidence does not indicate that CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers should receive an alternate dose.
Patients taking amitriptyline who are CYP2C19 rapid or ultrarapid metabolizers may be at risk for having low plasma concentrations and an imbalance between parent drug and metabolites causing treatment failure and/or adverse events. Although the CYP2C19*17 allele did not alter the sum of amitriptyline plus nortriptyline plasma concentrations, it was associated with higher nortriptyline plasma concentrations, possibly increasing the risk of adverse events. For patients taking amitriptyline, extrapolated pharmacokinetic data suggest that CYP2C19 rapid or ultrarapid metabolizers may need a dose increase. Due to the need for further studies investigating the clinical importance of CYP2C19*17 regarding tricyclic metabolism and the possibility of altered concentrations, we recommend to consider an alternative tricyclic or other drug not affected by CYP2C19. This recommendation is classified as optional due to limited available data. If amitriptyline is administered to a CYP2C19 rapid or ultrarapid metabolizer, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended.
CYP2C19 poor metabolizers are expected to have a greater ratio of amitriptyline to nortriptyline plasma concentrations. The elevated amitriptyline plasma concentrations may increase the chance of a patient experiencing side effects. Use an alternative agent not metabolized by CYP2C19 (e.g., nortriptyline and desipramine) or consider a 50% reduction of the usual amitriptyline starting dose along with therapeutic drug monitoring.
Please review the complete therapeutic recommendations that are located here: (2).
2011 Summary of recommendations from the Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Association for the Advancement of Pharmacy (KNMP):
For CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, defined as patients carrying two inactive alleles, reduce the dose of imipramine by 70% and monitor imipramine and desipramine plasma concentrations.
For CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers, defined as patients carrying two decreased-activity alleles or one active/ decreased-activity allele and one inactive allele, reduce the dose of imipramine by 30% and monitor imipramine and desipramine plasma concentrations.
For CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers, defined as patients carrying a gene duplication in the absence of inactive or decreased-activity alleles, select an alternative drug (e.g., citalopram, sertraline) or increase dose by 70% and monitor imipramine and desipramine plasma concentration (Table 5).
For CYP2C19 poor metabolizers, reduce the dose of imipramine by 30% and monitor plasma concentration of imipramine and desipramine or select an alternative drug (e.g., fluvoxamine, mirtazapine).
For CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, there is insufficient data to allow calculation of dose adjustment for imipramine, select an alternative drug (e.g., fluvoxamine, mirtazapine)
There are no data for dose recommendations for CYP2C19 ultrarapid metabolizers (Table 6).
Please review the complete therapeutic recommendations that are located here: (30, 31).
The level of evidence for the therapeutic (dose) recommendations is 4/4 (“good quality”) for all metabolizer types. There are no data for ultrarapid metabolizers. The Table is adapted from Swen J.J., Nijenhuis M., de Boer A., Grandia L. et al. Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte - an update of guidelines. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2011;89(5):662–73 (30). | |
Phenotype | Recommendations for imipramine therapy |
---|---|
Ultrarapid metabolizer | Select alternative drug (e.g., citalopram, sertraline) or increase dose by 70% and monitor imipramine and desipramine plasma concentration |
Intermediate metabolizer | Reduce dose by 30% and monitor imipramine and desipramine plasma concentrations |
Poor metabolizer | Reduce dose by 70% and monitor imipramine and desipramine plasma concentrations |
The level of evidence for the therapeutic (dose) recommendations is 4/4 (“good quality”) for all metabolizer types. The table is adapted from (31) | |
Phenotype | Recommendations for imipramine therapy |
---|---|
Ultrarapid metabolizer | No dose recommendations |
Intermediate metabolizer | No dose recommendations |
Poor metabolizer | Reduce dose by 70% and monitor plasma concentration of imipramine and desipramine or select alternative drug (e.g., fluvoxamine, mirtazapine) |
1 The FDA labels specific drug formulations. We have substituted the generic names for any drug labels in this excerpt. The FDA may not have labeled all formulations containing the generic drug.
- CPIC, 2017Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline (CPIC) for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants: 2016 update
IMPORTANT NOTE: NIH does not independently verify information submitted to the GTR; it relies on submitters to provide information that is accurate and not misleading. NIH makes no endorsements of tests or laboratories listed in the GTR. GTR is not a substitute for medical advice. Patients and consumers with specific questions about a genetic test should contact a health care provider or a genetics professional.