U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

Limbal dermoid

MedGen UID:
401267
Concept ID:
C1867616
Finding; Neoplastic Process
Synonyms: Epibulbar dermoid; Epibulbar dermoids
 
HPO: HP:0001140
Monarch Initiative: MONDO:0021454

Definition

A benign tumor typically found at the junction of the cornea and sclera (limbal epibullar dermoid). [from HPO]

Term Hierarchy

CClinical test,  RResearch test,  OOMIM,  GGeneReviews,  VClinVar  
  • Limbal dermoid

Conditions with this feature

Proteus syndrome
MedGen UID:
39008
Concept ID:
C0085261
Neoplastic Process
Proteus syndrome is characterized by progressive segmental or patchy overgrowth most commonly affecting the skeleton, skin, adipose, and central nervous systems. In most individuals Proteus syndrome has modest or no manifestations at birth, develops and progresses rapidly beginning in the toddler period, and relentlessly progresses through childhood, causing severe overgrowth and disfigurement. It is associated with a range of tumors, pulmonary complications, and a striking predisposition to deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis
MedGen UID:
140807
Concept ID:
C0406612
Congenital Abnormality
Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis (ECCL) comprises a spectrum of predominantly congenital anomalies. In its typical form, ECCL is characterized by congenital anomalies of the skin (nevus psiloliparus, patchy or streaky non-scarring alopecia, subcutaneous lipomas in the frontotemporal region, focal skin aplasia or hypoplasia on the scalp, and/or small nodular skin tags on the eyelids or between the outer canthus and tragus), eye (choristoma), and brain (in particular intracranial and spinal lipomas). To a much lesser degree, the bones and the heart can be affected. About 40% of affected individuals have bilateral abnormalities of the skin or the eyes. About one third of affected individuals have normal cognitive development, another one third have mild developmental delay (DD) or intellectual disability (ID), and the final one third have severe or unspecified DD/ID. Half of individuals have seizures. Affected individuals are at an increased (i.e., above the general population) risk of developing brain tumors, particularly low-grade gliomas such as pilocytic astrocytomas. There is evidence that oculoectodermal syndrome (OES) may constitute a clinical spectrum with ECCL, with OES on the mild end and ECCL on the more severe end of the spectrum.
Toriello-Lacassie-Droste syndrome
MedGen UID:
333068
Concept ID:
C1838329
Disease or Syndrome
Oculoectodermal syndrome (OES) is characterized by the association of epibulbar dermoids and aplasia cutis congenita. Affected individuals exhibit congenital scalp lesions which are atrophic, nonscarring, hairless regions that are often multiple and asymmetric in distribution, and may have associated hamartomas. Ectodermal changes include linear hyperpigmentation that may follow the lines of Blaschko and, rarely, epidermal nevus-like lesions. Epibulbar dermoids may be uni- or bilateral. Additional ocular anomalies such as skin tags of the upper eyelid and rarely optic nerve or retinal changes or microphthalmia can be present. Phenotypic expression is highly variable, and various other abnormalities have occasionally been reported, including growth failure, lymphedema, and cardiovascular defects, as well as neurodevelopmental symptoms such as developmental delay, epilepsy, learning difficulties, and behavioral abnormalities. Benign tumor-like lesions such as nonossifying fibromas of the long bones and giant cell granulomas of the jaws have repeatedly been observed and appear to be age-dependent, becoming a common manifestation in individuals aged 5 years or older (summary by Boppudi et al., 2016).
Craniofacial microsomia 1
MedGen UID:
501171
Concept ID:
C3495417
Congenital Abnormality
Craniofacial microsomia is a term used to describe a spectrum of abnormalities that primarily affect the development of the skull (cranium) and face before birth. Microsomia means abnormal smallness of body structures. Most people with craniofacial microsomia have differences in the size and shape of facial structures between the right and left sides of the face (facial asymmetry). In about two-thirds of cases, both sides of the face have abnormalities, which usually differ from one side to the other. Other individuals with craniofacial microsomia are affected on only one side of the face. The facial characteristics in craniofacial microsomia typically include underdevelopment of one side of the upper or lower jaw (maxillary or mandibular hypoplasia), which can cause dental problems and difficulties with feeding and speech. In cases of severe mandibular hypoplasia, breathing may also be affected.\n\nPeople with craniofacial microsomia usually have ear abnormalities affecting one or both ears, typically to different degrees. They may have growths of skin (skin tags) in front of the ear (preauricular tags), an underdeveloped or absent external ear (microtia or anotia), or a closed or absent ear canal; these abnormalities may lead to hearing loss. Eye problems are less common in craniofacial microsomia, but some affected individuals have an unusually small eyeball (microphthalmia) or other eye abnormalities that result in vision loss.\n\nAbnormalities in other parts of the body, such as malformed bones of the spine (vertebrae), abnormally shaped kidneys, and heart defects, may also occur in people with craniofacial microsomia.\n\nMany other terms have been used for craniofacial microsomia. These other names generally refer to forms of craniofacial microsomia with specific combinations of signs and symptoms, although sometimes they are used interchangeably. Hemifacial microsomia often refers to craniofacial microsomia with maxillary or mandibular hypoplasia. People with hemifacial microsomia and noncancerous (benign) growths in the eye called epibulbar dermoids may be said to have Goldenhar syndrome or oculoauricular dysplasia.
Auriculocondylar syndrome 2B
MedGen UID:
1841300
Concept ID:
C5830664
Disease or Syndrome
ARCND2B is characterized by the typical features of auriculocondylar syndrome, including the pathognomonic question mark ears, consisting of a variable degree of clefting between the helix and earlobe, as well as hypoplasia of the mandibular condyle, temporomandibular joint abnormalities, micrognathia, microstomia, glossoptosis, and a round facial appearance with prominent cheeks. Patients have difficulty chewing, respiratory abnormalities, snoring, and obstructive and central apneas. In addition, they experience severe gastrointestinal problems, including feeding difficulties with failure to thrive, gastroesophageal reflux, and chronic constipation, and male patients show macropenis whereas female patients may exhibit clitoromegaly (summary by Leoni et al., 2016). Heterozygous mutation in the PLCB4 gene also causes an autosomal dominant form of auriculocondylar syndrome (see ARCND2A, 614669). For a discussion of genetic heterogeneity of auriculocondylar syndrome, see ARCND1 (602483).

Professional guidelines

PubMed

Lang SJ, Böhringer D, Reinhard T
Eye (Lond) 2014 Jul;28(7):857-62. Epub 2014 May 23 doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.112. PMID: 24858530Free PMC Article

Recent clinical studies

Etiology

Jeong J, Rand GM, Lee JY, Kwon JW
PLoS One 2023;18(6):e0286250. Epub 2023 Jun 2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286250. PMID: 37267334Free PMC Article
AlGhadeer H, Kirat O, Vargas J, AlBadr L, Khandekar R
Eur J Ophthalmol 2023 Jan;33(1):587-594. Epub 2022 Jun 30 doi: 10.1177/11206721221111880. PMID: 35775117
Burcu A, Yalnız-Akkaya Z, Şingar Özdemir E, Özbek-Uzman S
Turk J Ophthalmol 2021 Aug 27;51(4):192-198. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.27116. PMID: 34461694Free PMC Article
Yamashita K, Hatou S, Uchino Y, Tsubota K, Shimmura S
Jpn J Ophthalmol 2019 Jan;63(1):56-64. Epub 2018 Nov 12 doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0639-9. PMID: 30421318
Lawan A
Niger J Med 2008 Jan-Mar;17(1):37-9. doi: 10.4314/njm.v17i1.37352. PMID: 18390130

Diagnosis

Schmidt J, Bremmer F, Brockmann K, Kaulfuß S, Wollnik B
Clin Genet 2022 Sep;102(3):239-241. Epub 2022 Jun 17 doi: 10.1111/cge.14174. PMID: 35670639
Hameed S, Kaur I, Singh V, Mishra DC, Reddy JC
Eur J Ophthalmol 2022 May;32(3):NP5-NP9. Epub 2021 Jan 5 doi: 10.1177/1120672120986365. PMID: 33401954
Karadag R, Rapuano CJ, Hammersmith KM, Nagra PK
Arq Bras Oftalmol 2020 Mar-Apr;83(2):98-102. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200023. PMID: 32159591
Chandravanshi SL
Indian J Ophthalmol 2014 May;62(5):622-7. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.133521. PMID: 24881613Free PMC Article
Low JR, Anshu A, Tan AC, Htoon HM, Tan DT
Am J Ophthalmol 2014 Sep;158(3):496-502. Epub 2014 May 27 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.020. PMID: 24875001

Therapy

Bandivadekar P, Agarwal T, Temkar S
Eye Contact Lens 2018 Mar;44(2):e7-e9. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000257. PMID: 27058832
Siddiqui S, Naaz S, Ahmad M, Khan ZA, Wahab S, Rashid BA
Neuroradiol J 2017 Dec;30(6):578-582. Epub 2017 Jul 14 doi: 10.1177/1971400917693638. PMID: 28707961Free PMC Article
Elbaz U, Mireskandari K, Shen C, Ali A
Cornea 2015 Jul;34(7):773-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000419. PMID: 25811720
Lang SJ, Böhringer D, Reinhard T
Eye (Lond) 2014 Jul;28(7):857-62. Epub 2014 May 23 doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.112. PMID: 24858530Free PMC Article
Read RW, Burnstine M, Rowland JM, Zamir E, Rao NA
Ophthalmology 2001 Apr;108(4):798-804. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00638-2. PMID: 11297501

Prognosis

Lin Y, Xie J, Wang H, Lu J, Ma D
Int Ophthalmol 2023 Jul;43(7):2273-2282. Epub 2023 Jan 14 doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02623-9. PMID: 36640245
Wan Q, Tang J, Han Y, Ye H
Int Ophthalmol 2020 Jan;40(1):43-49. Epub 2019 Nov 17 doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01201-w. PMID: 31735992
Yamashita K, Hatou S, Uchino Y, Tsubota K, Shimmura S
Jpn J Ophthalmol 2019 Jan;63(1):56-64. Epub 2018 Nov 12 doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0639-9. PMID: 30421318
Khan L, Malukani M, Saxena A
Nepal J Ophthalmol 2017 Jul;9(18):160-169. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v9i2.19262. PMID: 29634706
Low JR, Anshu A, Tan AC, Htoon HM, Tan DT
Am J Ophthalmol 2014 Sep;158(3):496-502. Epub 2014 May 27 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.020. PMID: 24875001

Clinical prediction guides

AlGhadeer H, Kirat O, Vargas J, AlBadr L, Khandekar R
Eur J Ophthalmol 2023 Jan;33(1):587-594. Epub 2022 Jun 30 doi: 10.1177/11206721221111880. PMID: 35775117
Schmidt J, Bremmer F, Brockmann K, Kaulfuß S, Wollnik B
Clin Genet 2022 Sep;102(3):239-241. Epub 2022 Jun 17 doi: 10.1111/cge.14174. PMID: 35670639
Karadag R, Rapuano CJ, Hammersmith KM, Nagra PK
Arq Bras Oftalmol 2020 Mar-Apr;83(2):98-102. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200023. PMID: 32159591
Yamashita K, Hatou S, Uchino Y, Tsubota K, Shimmura S
Jpn J Ophthalmol 2019 Jan;63(1):56-64. Epub 2018 Nov 12 doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0639-9. PMID: 30421318
Khan L, Malukani M, Saxena A
Nepal J Ophthalmol 2017 Jul;9(18):160-169. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v9i2.19262. PMID: 29634706

Supplemental Content

Table of contents

    Clinical resources

    Practice guidelines

    • PubMed
      See practice and clinical guidelines in PubMed. The search results may include broader topics and may not capture all published guidelines. See the FAQ for details.

    Consumer resources

    Recent activity

    Your browsing activity is empty.

    Activity recording is turned off.

    Turn recording back on

    See more...