Table 14Summary of Detailed Findings for Social Withdrawal

Outcome Study citationDetailed findings
Social withdrawal Mulfinger et al. (2018)50Results of all participants (n analyzed = 98 at baseline [T0], 84 at post-intervention [T1], 62 at follow-up [T2]).50 Between-group analyses were conducted using linear MMRM.

Stigma Coping Orientation Scale, mean (SD) at T0 vs. T1 vs. T2:

  • HOP = 4.04 (0.91) vs. 3.71 (0.98) vs. 3.70 (0.94)
  • Control = 4.04 (1.09) vs. 4.14 (1.03) vs. 4.17 (1.05)
  • Mean between-group difference (95% CI) for change from T0 to T1 = –0.34 (–0.63 to –0.05), p = 0.023
  • Mean between-group difference (95% CI) for change from T0 to T2 = –0.29 (–0.66 to 0.08), p = 0.12

CI = confidence interval; HOP= Honest, Open, Proud; MMRM = mixed model for repeated measures; SD = standard deviation

From: Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health

Cover of Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health
Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health: Health Technology Assessment [Internet].
Copyright © 2022 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.