Table 18Summary of Detailed Findings for Clinical Outcomes

Outcome Study citationDetailed findings
Anxiety Conley et al. (2020)39 and Hundert et al. (2021)40 (associated)Results of all participants (n analyzed = 117 at baseline [T0]), 107 at post-intervention [T1], 97 at post-booster [T2])39

Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, mean (SD) at T0 vs. T1 vs. T2:

  • HOP-C = 1.66 (0.77) vs. 1.73 (0.78) vs 1.66 (0.75)
  • Control = 1.92 (0.75) vs. 1.79 (0.86) vs. 1.69 (0.90)
  • Group x Time ANOVA for T0-T1-T2, p =0.213
Results of the 2- month follow-up analysis in a population subset from 1 university (n analyzed = 55 at all timepoints; baseline [T0], post-intervention [T1], 2 months follow-up [T4])40

Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, mean (SD) at T0 vs. T1 vs. T3:

  • HOP-C = 1.70 (0.73) vs. 1.88 (0.79) vs. 1.57 (0.88)
  • Control = 1.96 (0.76) vs. 1.87 (0.82) vs. 1.77 (0.85)
  • Group x Time ANOVA for T0-T1-T3, p = 0.252

DepressionConley et al. (2020)39 and Hundert et al. (2021)40 (associated)Results of all participants (n analyzed = 117 at baseline [T0]), 107 at post-intervention [T1], 97 at post-booster [T2])39

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Short Depression Scale 10, mean (SD) at T0 vs. T1 vs. T2:

     • HOP-C = 1.66 (0.57) vs. 1.57 (0.67) vs. 1.54 (0.67)

     • Control = 1.64 (0.61) vs. 1.53 (0.71) vs. 1.44 (0.74)

     • Group x Time ANOVA for T0-T1-T2, p = 0.743

Results of the 2- month follow-up analysis in a population subset from 1 university (n analyzed = 55 at all timepoints; baseline [T0], post-intervention [T1], 2 months follow-up [T4])40

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Short Depression Scale 10, mean (SD) at T0 vs. T1 vs. T3:

     • HOP-C = 1.74 (0.58) vs. 1.71 (0.63) vs. 1.54 (0.70)

     • Control = 1.65 (0.59) vs. 1.56 (0.68) vs. 1.39 (0.77)

     • Group x Time ANOVA for T0-T1-T3, p = 0.860

Mulfinger et al. (2018)50Results of all participants (n analyzed = 98 at baseline [T0], 84 at post-intervention [T1], 62 at follow-up [T2])50 Between-group analyses were conducted using linear MMRM.

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, mean (SD) at T0 vs. T1 vs. T2:

  • HOP = 26.22 (10.05) vs. 22.28 (11.34) vs 18.16 (10.27)
  • Control = 24.92 (10.16) vs. 23.58 (10.94) vs. 24.71 (11.24)
  • Mean between-group difference (95% CI) for change from T0 to T1 = –1.25 (–4.87 to 2.38), p = 0.50
  • Mean between-group difference (95% CI) for change from T0 to T2 = –7.25 (–10.85 to –3.65), p< 0.001

ANOVA = analysis of variance CI = confidence interval; HOP= Honest, Open, Proud; HOP-C = Honest, Open, Proud–College; ITT= intention to treat; MMRM = mixed model for repeated measures; SD = standard deviation

From: Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health

Cover of Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health
Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health: Health Technology Assessment [Internet].
Copyright © 2022 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.