Table 1Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Laparoscopic Mesh-Based Repair of Painful Primary Hernias in Adults (N = 179,338; 38 Studies)

OutcomeSurgery FavoredCalculated Differences (95% CI)Strength of Evidence
Hernia recurrenceOpen surgeryRR = 1.43 (1.15 to 1.79); a 2.49% recurrence rate after open repair versus a 4.46% recurrence rate after laparoscopy Image clinherniafu3.jpg
Length of hospital stayApproximate equivalenceSummary difference in means = 0.33 days (0.14 to 0.52) Image clinherniafu3.jpg
Return to normal daily activitiesLaparoscopicSummary weighted mean difference in days = 3.9 (2.2 to 5.6) Image clinherniafu1.jpg
Return to workLaparoscopicSummary weighted mean difference in days = 4.6 (3.1 to 6.1) Image clinherniafu1.jpg
Long-term painLaparoscopicOR = 0.61 (0.48 to 0.78) Image clinherniafu2.jpg
HematomaLaparoscopicOR = 0.696 (0.553 to 0.875) Image clinherniafu3.jpg
Wound infectionLaparoscopicOR = 0.49 (0.33 to 0.71) Image clinherniafu2.jpg
Epigastric vessel injuryOpenOR = 2.1 (1.1 to 3.9) Image clinherniafu3.jpg
Small-bowel injuryInconclusiveOR = 0.715 (0.112 to 4.555) Image clinherniafu4.jpg
Small-bowel obstructionInconclusiveOR = 2.159 (0.583 to 8.001) Image clinherniafu4.jpg
Urinary retentionInconclusiveOR = 1.247 (0.836 to 1.861) Image clinherniafu4.jpg
Spermatic cord injuryInconclusive
  • In one study, 0 in 67 open repairs and 0 in 122 laparoscopic repairs
  • In a second study, 1% after open repair (8/994) and 0.1% after laparoscopic repair (1/989)
Image clinherniafu4.jpg

95% CI = 95 percent confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk

From: Surgical Management of Inguinal Hernia

Cover of Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians
Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians [Internet].

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.