Table F1Quality assessment of systematic reviews of acetaminophen

Study, Year(1) ‘A priori’ design provided?(2) Duplicate study selection and data extraction?
  1. Study selection
  2. Data extraction
(3) Comprehensive literature search performed?(4) Status of publication used as an inclusion criteria?(5) List of studies (included and excluded) provided?(6) Characteristics of the included studies provided?(7) Scientific quality of included studies assessed and documented?(8) Scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions?(9) Methods used to synthesize the findings of studies appropriate?(10) Likelihood of publication bias assessed?(11) Conflict of interest stated?
  1. Systematic Review
  2. Individual Studies
Quality Rating
Roelofs, 2008Yes
  1. Yes
  2. Yes
YesUnclearYesYesYesYesYesYes
  1. Yes
  2. No
Good

Please see Appendix C. Included Studies for full study references.

From: Appendix F, Quality Assessment

Cover of Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 169.
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al.
Copyright Notice

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.