Table F13Quality assessment of systematic reviews of exercise

Author, Year“A priori” design provided?Duplicate study selection and data abstraction?
  1. Study selection
  2. Data abstraction
Comprehensive literature search performed?Non-English language studies considered for inclusion?Conducted searches for unpublished (gray) literature?List of included studies provided?List of excluded studies provided with reasons?Characteristics of the included studies provided?Scientific quality of included studies:
  1. Assessed?
  2. Documented?
Sensitivity analyses or stratified analyses conducted according to study quality?Study conclusions supported by the evidence? (Was study quality considered in the synthesis?)Conflict of interest stated?
  1. Systematic Review
  2. Individual Studies
Multidisciplinary systematic review team?Quality Rating
Bystrom, 2013Yesa. Yes; b. no>2 databases through October 2011; no mention of “plus” sourcesNoNot statedYesNoYes
  1. 10-point PEDro scale
  2. marginally - score out of 10 provided; areas of methodological concern for studies not described
No; no information on heterogeneity providedYes
  1. Systematic review: Yes, however 1 author is also author of one of the included trials
  2. Individual studies: No
UnclearFair
Oesch, 2010Yesa. Yes; b. NoYes, >2 databases through Aug 2008; checked refsNoNot statedYesNoYes
  1. According to Juni
  2. Not by study
Metaregresion-NS Effect of specific exercise characteristics; sensitivity by study quality; funnel plotYes
  1. Funding source stated
  2. No
YesFair
van Middelkoop, 2010Yesa. Yes; b. YesData bases through 2008 for CLBP only; unclear if additional sourcesCite Cochrane Back group strategy used - assume no restriction?Cite Cochrane Back group strategy used - assume so?Not explicitly; references providedNoNo
  1. Yes
  2. Yes
NoYes
  1. No
  2. No
UnclearFair

Please see Appendix C. Included Studies for full study references.

From: Appendix F, Quality Assessment

Cover of Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 169.
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.