Table F26Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of massage

Author, YearRandomization adequate?Allocation concealment adequate?Groups similar at baseline?Eligibility criteria specified?Outcome assessors masked?Care provider masked?Patient masked?Attrition and withdrawals reported?Attrition acceptable and comparable?Analyze people in the groups in which they were randomizedPrimary outcome specified and reported?Other issues?Quality Rating
Ajimsha, 2014UnclearNoYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesNoneFair
Borges, 2014YesUnclearYesYesUnclearNoUnclearYesYesYesYesNoneFair
Cherkin, 2011YesYesYesYesYes - for the two massage groups onlyNoYesYesYesYesYesNoneGood
Kong, 2012YesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesNoneGood
Romanowski, 2012UnclearUnclearYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesNonePoor
Sritooma, 2014YesUnclearYesYesNoNoNo - not describedYesYesYesYesNoneFair
Zhang, 2015NoNoYesYesYesNoUnclearYesYesYesYesNoneFair
Zheng, 2012YesUnknownYesYesUnclearUnclearUnclearYesYesYesYesNoneFair

Please see Appendix C. Included Studies for full study references.

From: Appendix F, Quality Assessment

Cover of Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 169.
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.