Table F33Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of electrical stimulation

Author, YearRandomizationConcealed Treatment AllocationBaseline Group SimilarityPatient BlindedCare Provider BlindedOutcome Assessor / Data Analyst BlindedCointerventions Avoided or SimilarCompliance Acceptable in all GroupsAttrition ReportedAttrition AcceptableTiming of Outcome Assessment in all Groups SimilarIntention-to-Treat AnalysisIs There a Registered or Published ProtocolAvoidance of Selective Outcomes ReportingQuality (Cochrane Back Group)Comments
Durmus, 2009UnclearUnclearYesNoNoUnclearUnclearUnclearNoUnclearYesUnclearUnclearYesPoorSome outcomes assessed as means and others as medians, no explanation provided
Durmus, 2010UnclearUnclearYesNoNoUnclearUnclearUnclearYesYesYesNoUnclearYesPoorSome outcomes assessed as means and others as medians, no explanation provided
Glaser, 2001YesUnclearYesYesYesUnclearUnclearUnclearYesNoYesNoUnclearYesPoorVery high loss to followup
Moore, 1997UnclearUnclearUnclearYesUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearYesYesYesNoUnclearYesPoorCrossover design, results of first intervention not reported and carryover effects not assessed
Pope, 1994YesUnclearUnclearNoNoYesUnclearNoYesYesYesUnclearYesYesFair

Please see Appendix C. Included Studies for full study references.

From: Appendix F, Quality Assessment

Cover of Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain
Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 169.
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.