Table 3KQ1a: Summary results of systematic reviews on diagnosis

ModalityMDCTEUS-FNAMRIPET/CT
Number of reviews18, and 4 were high quality3 (2 mostly duplicative of each other)3
Quality of reviews (based on revised AMSTAR)Low4 Low, 4 HighLowLow
Most recent review2005201320122013
Range of resultsSensitivity: 91%
Specificity: 85%
High quality reviews:
Sensitivity: 85% to 93%
Specificity: 94% to 100%
Sensitivity: 84% to 86%
Specificity: 82% to 91%
Sensitivity: 87% to 90%
Specificity: 80% to 85%

EUS-FNA = Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration; MDCT = multidetector computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PET/CT = position emission tomography–computed tomography.

From: Results

Cover of Imaging Tests for the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Imaging Tests for the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 141.
Treadwell J, Mitchell M, Eatmon K, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.