Table 5Characteristics of Included Non-Randomized Studies in Children

First Author, Publication Year, CountryStudy DesignPopulation CharacteristicsIntervention and Comparator(s)Clinical Outcomes, Length of Follow-Up
Kang 2016, South Korea27

Prospective observational study comparing two groups of patients who received infliximab: either as part of step-up or top-down

Patients prospectively enrolled and could choose to receive step-up or top-down with their guardian after explanation of options

Study was specifically interested in those who received infliximab (either early or as part of step-up) and therefore only included in step-up group if eventually received infliximab after failure of conventional therapy

n=76, median age at diagnosis 14 years for step-up and 15 year for top-down, 64% male, median PCDAI = 35, median duration to infliximab treatment 8 months in step-up and 0.7 months in top-down

Pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) with moderate to severe luminal disease were included (excluded if mild disease, penetrating disease, strictures, refractory perianal strictures or history of bowel surgery)

Top-down: within 1 month from diagnosis, infliximab 5mg/kg at 0, 2, 6, 14 weeks then every 8 weeks plus AZA 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day (adjusted as required) plus mesalazine 50 mg/kg/day

Step-up: oral corticosteroid (not specified) 1 mg/kg/day tapered over 8 weeks plus AZA 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day (adjusted as required) plus mesalazine 50 mg/kg/day; if disease relapsed then infliximab initiated (as in top-down group)

Primary outcome: mucosal healing (SES-CD score=0) at 14 and 54 weeks from baseline infliximab

Secondary outcomes: clinical remission (PCDAI<10), PCDAI, adverse events, SES-CD score

Baseline was first infliximab dose

Lee 2015, South Korea30

Retrospective review of a prospective study

Conducted at one hospital based on patients from 2008 to 2012; 2 groups depending on treatment received (therapy decisions made by guardians after explanation of treatment options)

n = 51, median age at diagnosis 15 years old, sex not described

Patients had moderate to severe Crohn’s (PCDAI 39 in top-down and 34 in step-up at baseline)

Disease duration 1 month in top-down versus 10.8 months in step-up

71% had fistula in top-down and 55% in step-up

Patients in step-up initially achieved remission on conventional but eventually required infliximab

Top-down: patients who started infliximab at the time of diagnosis (in combination with AZA, mesalazine and corticosteroids)

Step-up: patients who started infliximab after relapse (and where remission had been achieved with conventional therapy)

Infliximab given 5 mg/kg week 0, 2, 6 then every 8 weeks

Disease remission (PCDAI < 10 points)

Relapse free rate (relapse defined as PCDAI > 10 points after clinical remission), adverse events

Follow-up over 3 years

Walters 2014, USA and Canada29Prospective observational study (data from 28 pediatric gastroenterology centres in North America from 2008 to 2012); propensity score matching to create three groups: (1) early anti-TNF, (2) early immunomodulator, (3) no early immunotherapy

n=552 (propensity score matched sample n=204); median age 13.8 years for anti-TNF, 12.6 years for immunomodulator, 12.0 years for no therapy; 62% male; 45% with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease

Patients <17 years of age newly diagnosed with non-penetrating, non-stricturing disease were included; patients receiving early anti-TNFα in combination with an early immunomodulator were excluded

Three groups:
(1)

early anti-TNF

(2)

early immunomodulator

(3)

no early immunotherapy

Early = within 3 months of diagnosis; all patients could receive corticosteroids or mesalamine
Primary outcome: corticosteroid free clinical remission (PCDAI < 10) at 1 year after diagnosis
Lee 2012, South Korea25

Retrospective chart review

Charts were reviewed at one hospital in patients followed for at least 36 months between 1998 and 2009; patients were put into 2 groups depending on treatment received

n = 28, 14% female

Mean age 13 years

Mean PCDAI score at diagnosis 40.5

Patients either had moderate or severe CD (top-down group) or had therapy-resistant CD (step-up group)

Top-down: infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks then every 8 weeks for 10 months in combination with AZA daily

Step-up: oral prednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/day and mesalamine (50 to 80 mg/kg/day) or AZA (2 go 3 mg/kg/day), then infliximab

Relapse (PCDAI > 10 points after remission)

Evaluated at 1, 2, and 3 years

Kim 2011, South Korea28Researchers identified patients given infliximab for therapy resistant or severe Crohn’s disease between 2001 and 2008; these patients were identified from two hospitals and had to have follow-up data for 1 year; patients grouped according to therapy received

n = 29, 17% female

Mean age 14

Patients had therapy resistant (step-up group) or severe Crohn’s (top-down), mean PCDAI score 41; 62% of patients had a fistula

Top-down: infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks then every 8 weeks for 10 months in combination with AZA daily

Step-up: oral prednisolone 1 to 2 mg/kg/day and mesalamine (50 to 80 mg/kg/day) or AZA (2 go 3 mg/kg/day), then infliximab

Disease remission (PCDAI score < 10), adverse events, clinical status (PCDAI score), fistula closure, adverse events, at 8 weeks and 1 year
Lee 2010, South Korea26

Retrospective chart review

Charts were reviewed at one hospital for newly diagnosed patients naïve to treatment and followed for at least 24 months from 2001 to 2007; patients were divided by 3 groups depending on which treatment they received

n = 36, 25% female

Age 1 to 16 (median 13)

Newly diagnosed with Crohn’s disease (mean PCDAI at diagnosis 33)

A: oral prednisolone (1 to 2 mg/kg/day) then mesalamine (50 to 80 mg/kg/day)

B: oral prednisolone then AZA (2 to 3 mg/kg/day)

C: infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks then every 8 week for 10 months, plus AZA

Relapse (PCDAI > 10 after remission)

Adverse events

Follow up at 12 and 24 months

AZA = Azathioprine; CRP = C-reactive protein; PCDAI = Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; SES-CD = Simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease; TNF = tumor necrosis factor

From: Early Biologic Treatment versus Conventional Treatment for the Management of Crohn’s Disease: A Review of Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness

Cover of Early Biologic Treatment versus Conventional Treatment for the Management of Crohn’s Disease: A Review of Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness
Early Biologic Treatment versus Conventional Treatment for the Management of Crohn’s Disease: A Review of Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness [Internet].
Thompson W, Argáez C.
Copyright © 2019 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.