Table 5Clinical evidence profile: Discharge planning versus standard processes

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQualityImportance
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsDischargestandard processesRelative (95% CI)Absolute
Readmission (follow-up 30 days; assessed with: number readmitted)
1randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyserious2serious3none-0%HR 1.17 (0.79 to 1.73)-

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT
Readmission (follow-up 5-30 days; assessed with: number readmitted)
3randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessserious3none

74/493

(15%)

20.7%RR 0.74 (0.56 to 0.98)54 fewer per 1000 (from 4 fewer to 91 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

IMPORTANT
Mortality (follow-up 5 days -12 months; assessed with: number of deaths)
4randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessserious3none

98/824

(11.9%)

10%RR 1.13 (0.87 to 1.48)13 more per 1000 (from 13 fewer to 48 more)

⨁⨁⨁◯

MODERATE

CRITICAL
Mortality (follow-up 6 months; assessed with: number of deaths)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyserious2very serious3none-0%HR 0.54 (0.23 to 1.27)-

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Mortality (in-hospital) (follow-up during admission; assessed with: number of deaths during admission)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyserious2very serious3none

3/51

(5.9%)

8.3%RR 0.71 (0.18 to 2.81)24 fewer per 1000 (from 68 fewer to 150 more)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Avoidable adverse events (follow-up 1-5 days; assessed with: adverse medicine reaction)
1randomised trialsvery serious1no serious inconsistencyserious2very serious3none

3/30

(10%)

6.7%RR 1.5 (0.27 to 8.34)34 more per 1000 (from 49 fewer to 492 more)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Avoidable adverse events (follow-up 12 months; assessed with: falls)
1randomised trialsvery serious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessvery serious3none

13/30

(43.3%)

50%RR 0.87 (0.5 to 1.49)65 fewer per 1000 (from 250 fewer to 245 more)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Quality of life (follow-up 180 days; assessed with: minimal clinically important difference on St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire)
1randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyserious2very serious3none

24/63

(38.1%)

41.7%RR 0.91 (0.6 to 1.39)38 fewer per 1000 (from 167 fewer to 163 more)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Quality of life (follow-up 7 days; measured with: medical outcomes study short form 12 - physical ratings; Better indicated by higher values)
1randomised trialsvery serious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone9198-MD 0 higher (1.23 lower to 1.23 higher)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

CRITICAL
Quality of life (follow-up 7 days; measured with: medical outcomes study short form 12 - mental ratings; Better indicated by higher values)
1randomised trialsvery serious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessserious3none9198-MD 1.5 higher (0.11 lower to 3.11 higher)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Patient satisfaction (follow-up 7 days; measured with: rating of discharge process; Better indicated by higher values)
1randomised trialsvery serious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessserious3none9198-MD 0.21 higher (0.05 to 0.37 higher)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Patient satisfaction (follow-up 30 days; assessed with: preparedness to leave hospital (prepared or very prepared))
1randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessserious3none

197/307

(64.2%)

52.9%RR 1.21 (1.06 to 1.39)111 more per 1000 (from 32 more to 206 more)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

CRITICAL
Length of stay (measured with: days in hospital; Better indicated by lower values)
5randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone661676-MD 0.58 lower (1.45 lower to 0.28 higher)

⨁⨁⨁◯

MODERATE

CRITICAL
Staff satisfaction (follow-up 7 days; measured with: GP satisfaction; Better indicated by higher values)
1randomised trialsvery serious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone9198-MD 0.18 lower (0.37 lower to 0.01 higher)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

IMPORTANT
1

Downgraded by 1 increment if the majority of the evidence was at high risk of bias, and downgraded by 2 increments if the majority of the evidence was at very high risk of bias.

2

Downgraded by 1 or 2 increments because the majority of the evidence was based on indirect interventions (interventions included post discharge components).

3

Downgraded by 1 increment if the confidence interval crossed 1 MID or by 2 increments if the confidence interval crossed both MIDs.

From: Chapter 35, Discharge planning

Cover of Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation
Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation.
NICE Guideline, No. 94.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2018.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.