Table 15Studies excluded from the clinical review

StudyExclusion reason
Abu-oliem 20132Inappropriate comparison (ward-based pharmacist)
Alassaad 20144Incorrect comparison. Post-hoc subgroup analysis for no of prescribed drugs from included study (Gillespie 200921)
Basger 20155Incorrect population (patients admitted for treatment of chronic disease in addition to rehab after joint replacement surgery)
Bessen 20157Inappropriate study design (comparison of 2 hospitals)
Bolas 20049No extractable outcomes
Burnett 200910Inappropriate comparison (normal care involved chart reviews, counselling etc. by pharmacists)
Cani 201511Not review population (chronic disease management)
Chen 201612Incorrect population (patients with chronic condition, not admitted to hospital); incorrect intervention (pharmacists were not ward-based)
De boer 201114Protocol only
Ghatnekar 2013A20Inappropriate study design (health economic model); no relevant outcomes
Graabaek 201322Systematic review: study designs inappropriate (non-randomised studies, non-ward based interventions, ward-based comparators)
Heselmans 201523Incorrect intervention (drug therapy changes communicated to the physician; pharmacist was not ward-based)
Hodgkinson 200624Systematic review: study designs inappropriate (non-randomised studies, non-ward based interventions, ward-based comparators)
Horn 200625No intervention (literature review)
Israel 201326No relevant outcomes (underutilization of cardiovascular medications)
Jarab 201227Study to be considered in the comm pharm review
Kaboli 200628Systematic review: study designs inappropriate (non-randomised studies, non-ward based interventions, ward-based comparators)
Koehler 2009A33Inappropriate comparison- care bundle including clinical pharmacist for elderly high risk patients compared to usual care group including staff pharmacist
Klopotowska 201032Incorrect study design (before and after)
Kucukarslan 201334Incorrect study design (before and after)
Leape 199936Incorrect study design (observational)
Lipton 199238Incorrect interventions (post-discharge care)
Maclaren 200940Incorrect study design (retrospective cohort)
Makowsky 200941Inappropriate comparison (ward-based pharmacist)
Malone 200142Not review population (ambulatory care)
Mousavi 201343Not review population (nutritional support service)
Neto 201145Incorrect interventions (not ward-based)
O’dell 200547Incorrect study design (non-randomised, observational)
Okumura 201449Systematic review has unclear PICO (no breakdown of studies, most took place in ambulatory care)
O’Sullivan 201648Inappropriate comparison (pharmacist review vs. clinical decision support software supported pharmacist review)
Penm 201451Systematic review (studies based in China only; references screened)
Phatak 201652Inappropriate comparison (normal care involved daily pharmacist assessment)
Renaudin 201653Systematic review and meta-analysis- ordered relevant references
Roblek 201654Incorrect intervention (advice about drug-drug interactions given to physicians; pharmacist was not ward-based)
Sadik 200555Study to be considered in the comm pharm review
Schnipper 200656Study to be considered in the comm pharm review
Stowasser 200260Incorrect interventions (not ward-based)
Suhaj 201661Incorrect population (patients with chronic condition, not admitted to hospital); incorrect intervention (pharmacists were not ward-based)
Upadhyay 201564Incorrect population (patients with chronic condition, not admitted to hospital); incorrect intervention (pharmacists were not ward-based)
Upadhyay 201663Incorrect population (patients with chronic condition, not admitted to hospital); incorrect intervention (pharmacists were not ward-based); no relevant outcomes
Viswanathan 201565Systematic review is not relevant (outpatient settings only)
Wang 2015A67Incorrect population (patients with cancer, not admitted to hospital); incorrect intervention (pharmacists were not ward-based)
Zhao 2015E68Article not in English

From: Chapter 30, Pharmacist support

Cover of Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation
Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation.
NICE Guideline, No. 94.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2018.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.