Table 5Clinical evidence summary: Regular in-hospital ward based pharmacy support compared to no ward-based pharmacist

OutcomesNo of Participants (studies) Follow upQuality of the evidence (GRADE)Relative effect (95% CI)Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with no ward-based pharmacistRisk difference with Regular in-hospital pharmacist support (95% CI)
Mortality

1060

(3 studies)

1 years

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWa,b

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 0.92 (0.72 to 1.16)198 per 1000

16 fewer per 1000

(from 55 fewer to 32 more)

Survival

368

(1 study)

1 years

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWa,b

due to risk of bias, imprecision

HR 0.94 (0.65 to 1.36)Control group risk not providedAbsolute effect cannot be calculated
Future admissions to hospital (over 30 days)

1892

(4 studies)

1 years

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEa

due to risk of bias

RR 0.93 (0.83 to 1.04)384 per 1000

27 fewer per 1000

(from 65 fewer to 15 more)

Readmission

592

(1 study)

30 days

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWa,b

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 0.92 (0.62 to 1.37)146 per 1000

12 fewer per 1000

(from 55 fewer to 54 more)

Prescribing errors medication appropriateness index

811

(2 studies)

at discharge

⊕⊕⊕⊝

LOWa,c

due to risk of bias, inconsistency

--

The mean prescribing errors in the intervention groups was

0.02 lower

(0.12 lower to 1.08 higher)

Prescribing errors medication appropriateness index

613

(1 study)

30 days

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEa

due to risk of bias

-

The mean prescribing errors in the control groups was

9.6

The mean prescribing errors in the intervention groups was

2.1 higher

(0.45 to 3.75 higher)

Preventable adverse drug events

790

(2 studies)

until discharge

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWa,b,c

due to risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision

RR 0.74 (0.06 to 8.57)54 per 1000

14 fewer per 1000

(from 51 fewer to 409 more)

Preventable adverse drug events

588

(1 study)

90 days

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWa,b

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 0.77 (0.29 to 2.05)31 per 1000

7 fewer per 1000

(from 22 fewer to 33 more)

Adverse drug reactions

85

(1 study)

6 months

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWa,b

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 1.47 (0.26 to 8.33)48 per 1000

23 more per 1000

(from 36 fewer to 352 more)

Length of stay (days)

1116

(2 studies)

in-hospital

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEa

due to risk of bias

The mean length of stay in the control groups was

17.8 days

The mean length of stay in the intervention groups was

1.74 lower

(2.76 to 0.72 lower)

Patient and/or carer satisfaction (1 month follow-up)

172

(1 study)

1 months

⊕⊕⊝⊝

LOWa

due to risk of bias

RR 1.79 (1.38 to 2.32)446 per 1000

352 more per 1000

(from 169 more to 589 more)

Patient and/or carer satisfaction (at discharge)

85

(1 study)

at discharge

⊕⊕⊝⊝

LOWa,b

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 1.49 (1.09 to 2.03)548 per 1000

269 more per 1000

(from 49 more to 564 more)

(a)

Downgraded by 1 increment if the majority of the evidence was at high risk of bias, and downgraded by 2 increments if the majority of the evidence was at very high risk of bias.

(b)

Downgraded by 1 increment if the confidence interval crossed 1 MID or by 2 increments if the confidence interval crossed both MIDs.

(c)

Downgraded by 1 because: The point estimate varies widely across studies, unexplained by subgroup analysis.

From: Chapter 30, Pharmacist support

Cover of Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation
Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation.
NICE Guideline, No. 94.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2018.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.