Table 5Clinical evidence summary: Community based palliative care versus usual care

OutcomesNo of Participants (studies) Follow upQuality of the evidence (GRADE)Relative effect (95% CI)Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with usual careRisk difference with Community palliative care (95% CI)

Quality of life

Quality of life at end of life scale. Scale from: 21 to 105.

414

(2 studies)

3-4 months

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEa

due to inconsistency

--

The mean quality of life in the intervention groups was

0.25 lower

(1.03 lower to 0.53 higher)

Quality of life

Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy spiritual well-being scale. Scale from: 0 to 184.

426

(2 studies)

3-4 months

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEb

due to imprecision

--

The mean quality of life in the intervention groups was

4.63 higher

(1.53 to 7.73 higher)

Patient satisfaction overall satisfaction rating. Scale from: 1 to 10.

38

(1 study)

4 months

⊕⊕⊝⊝

LOWc

due to risk of bias

--

The mean patient satisfaction in the intervention groups was

1.4 higher

(0.69 to 2.11 higher)

Patient satisfaction

FAMCARE patient satisfaction with care scale. Scale from: 16 to 80.

274

(1 study)

4 months

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEb

due to imprecision

--

The mean patient satisfaction in the intervention groups was

6 higher

(3.94 to 8.06 higher)

Relatives satisfaction overall satisfaction rating. Scale from: 1 to 10.

33

(1 study)

4 months

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWb,c

due to risk of bias, imprecision

--

The mean relatives satisfaction in the intervention groups was

1.6 higher

(0.19 to 3.01 higher)

Death at home

109

(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWb,c

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 1.14 (0.79 to 1.65)Moderate
475 per 1000

66 more per 1000

(from 100 fewer to 309 more)

Length of stay

rate of hospital days

109

(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWb,c

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 0.73 (0.41 to 1.3)Moderate
-

ED visits

rate of ED visits

109

(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

VERY LOWb,c

due to risk of bias, imprecision

RR 0.73 (0.45 to 1.19)Moderate
-

Readmissions

No. of patients readmitted within 28 days

84

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

LOWb

due to imprecision

RR 0.72 (0.34 to 1.52)Moderate
293 per 1000

82 fewer per 1000

(from 193 fewer to 152 more)

Admissions

No. of patients admitted within 84 days

84

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝

MODERATEb

due to imprecision

RR 0.53 (0.33 to 0.88)Moderate
610 per 1000

287 fewer per 1000

(from 73 fewer to 409 more)

Quality of life

Chronic heart failure questionnaire (higher score is better)

84

(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

LOWb,c

due to risk of bias, imprecision

--

The mean quality of life in the intervention group was 0.79 higher

(0.23 to 1.25 higher)

(a)

Heterogeneity, I2=50%, p=0.04, unexplained by subgroup analysis.

(b)

Downgraded by 1 increment if the confidence interval crossed 1 MID or by 2 increments if the confidence interval crossed both MIDs.

(c)

Downgraded by 1 increment if the majority of the evidence was at high risk of bias, and downgraded by 2 increments if the majority of the evidence was at very high risk of bias.

From: Chapter 14, Community palliative care

Cover of Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation
Emergency and acute medical care in over 16s: service delivery and organisation.
NICE Guideline, No. 94.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2018.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.