GNAO1-Related Disorder

Synonyms: GNAO1-Associated Disorder, GNAO1-Associated Epileptic Encephalopathy and Movement Disorder

Briere L, Thiel M, Sweetser DA, et al.

Publication Details

Estimated reading time: 44 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

GNAO1-related disorder encompasses a broad phenotypic continuum that includes hyperkinetic movement disorders and/or epilepsy and is typically associated with developmental delay and intellectual disability. Viewed by age of onset, three clusters in this continuum can be observed: (1) infantile-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) with or without prominent movement disorder; (2) infantile- or early childhood-onset prominent movement disorder and neurodevelopmental disorder with or without childhood-onset epilepsy with varying seizure types; (3) later childhood- or adult-onset movement disorder with variable developmental delay and intellectual disability.

Epilepsy can be either DEE (onset typically within the first year of life of drug-resistant epilepsy in which developmental delays are attributed to the underlying diagnosis as well as the impact of uncontrolled seizures) or varying seizure types (onset typically between ages three and ten years of focal or generalized tonic-clonic seizures that may be infrequent or well controlled with anti-seizure medications).

Movement disorders are characterized by dystonia and choreoathetosis, most commonly a mixed pattern of persistent or paroxysmal dyskinesia that affects the whole body. Exacerbations of the hyperkinetic movement disorder, which can be spontaneous or triggered (e.g., by intercurrent illness, emotional stress, voluntary movements), can last minutes to weeks. Hyperkinetic crises (including status dystonicus) are characterized by temporarily increased and nearly continuous involuntary movements or dystonic posturing that can be life-threatening.

Deaths in early childhood have been reported due to medically refractory epilepsy or hyperkinetic crises, but the phenotypic spectrum includes milder presentations, including in adults. As many adults with disabilities have not undergone advanced genetic testing, it is likely that adults with GNAO1-related disorder are underrecognized and underreported.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of GNAO1-related disorder is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in GNAO1 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: There is no cure for GNAO1-related disorder. Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications can include multidisciplinary care by specialists in child neurology, adult neurology, neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, orthopedic surgery, speech-language therapy, and psychology.

Surveillance: Frequent evaluations by treating specialists are necessary to monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations.

Genetic counseling.

GNAO1-related disorder is an autosomal dominant disorder most often caused by a de novo pathogenic variant. Individuals with severe GNAO1-related disorder phenotypes (i.e., DEE, severe developmental delay and/or intellectual disability, and/or an early-onset movement disorder) typically represent simplex cases (i.e., the only family member known to be affected) and have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant; however, recurrence of severe GNAO1-related disorder phenotypes in affected sibs due to presumed parental germline mosaicism has been reported. Vertical transmission from an affected parent to an affected child has been reported in several families with the milder phenotype (i.e., later childhood- or adult-onset movement disorder with variable developmental delay and intellectual disability). Once the GNAO1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

GeneReview Scope

GNAO1-related disorder encompasses a broad continuum, including epilepsy and hyperkinetic movement disorders as prominent clinical phenotypes, but there is overlap in most affected individuals.

Table Icon

Table

GNAO1-Related Disorder: Phenotypic Spectrum

Diagnosis

No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for GNAO1-related disorder have been published.

Suggestive Findings

GNAO1-related disorder should be considered in individuals with the following clinical findings and family history.

Clinical findings

  • Epilepsy
    • Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). Early-onset (typically within the first year of life) drug-resistant epilepsy where developmental delays are attributed to the underlying diagnosis as well as the impact of uncontrolled seizures.
    • Non-DEE epilepsy. Later-onset focal seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (ages 3-10 years). Seizures may be infrequent or well controlled with anti-seizure medications.
  • Movement disorder. Most commonly presenting in infancy or early childhood consisting of choreoathetosis and dystonia with distinct risk for exacerbations of hyperkinetic movement disorder. Onset in later childhood and adulthood has been reported.
  • Axial hypotonia. Typically present from birth or evident within the first few months of life.
  • Mild-to-profound intellectual disability initially presenting as global developmental delay; reported in most but not all
  • Feeding difficulties, most prominently in infancy

Family history. Because GNAO1-related disorder is typically caused by a de novo pathogenic variant, most probands represent a simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family). Rarely, the family history may be consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance (e.g., affected males and females in multiple generations).

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of GNAO1-related disorder is established in a proband with suggestive findings and a heterozygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in GNAO1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this section is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of a heterozygous GNAO1 variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Approach to molecular genetic testing in a child with developmental delay or an older individual with intellectual disability may begin with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Other options include use of a multigene panel or exome sequencing. Note: Single-gene testing (sequence analysis of GNAO1, followed by gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis) is rarely useful and typically NOT recommended.

  • A multigene panel for epilepsy or movement disorders that includes GNAO1 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
  • Comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene(s) are likely involved but may require relevant clinical details. Exome sequencing is most commonly used and yields results similar to an intellectual disability multigene panel, with the additional advantage that exome sequencing includes genes recently identified as causing intellectual disability, whereas some multigene panels may not. Genome sequencing is also possible.
    For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table Icon

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in GNAO1-Related Disorder

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

GNAO1-related disorder encompasses a spectrum of hyperkinetic movement disorders and/or epilepsy, typically associated with global developmental delay and intellectual disability.

To date, information on more than 200 individuals with GNAO1-related disorder have been published [Nakamura et al 2013, EuroEPINOMICS-RES Consortium et al 2014, Law et al 2015, Talvik et al 2015, Zhu et al 2015, Ananth et al 2016, Dhamija et al 2016, Gawlinski et al 2016, Helbig et al 2016, Kulkarni et al 2016, Marcé-Grau et al 2016, Menke et al 2016, Saitsu et al 2016, Yilmaz et al 2016, Arya et al 2017, Danti et al 2017, Schorling et al 2017, Bruun et al 2018, Honey et al 2018, Koy et al 2018, Okumura et al 2018, Waak et al 2018, Benato et al 2019, Kelly et al 2019, Malaquias et al 2019, Muir et al 2019, Schirinzi et al 2019, Arisaka et al 2020, Kim et al 2020, Yamashita et al 2020, Turro et al 2020, Akasaka et al 2021, Dzinovic et al 2021, Chaib et al 2022, Chopra et al 2022, Fung et al 2022, Krenn et al 2022, Krygier et al 2022, Liu et al 2022, Pérez-Dueñas et al 2022, Di Rocco et al 2023, Domínguez-Carral et al 2023, Galosi et al 2023, Gambardella et al 2023, Garofalo et al 2023, Hu et al 2023, Li et al 2023, Novelli et al 2023, Thiel et al 2023, Vasconcellos et al 2023]. The following description of the phenotypic features associated GNAO1-related disorder is based on these reports.

Epilepsy

Approximately half (50%-65%) of affected individuals have seizures and/or are diagnosed with epilepsy. While seizures may be refractory to anti-seizure medications (ASMs), some individuals have only a single seizure [Kelly et al 2019] or have only had seizures in the past [Axeen et al 2021].

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) is the most common epilepsy phenotype, occurring in 69% of individuals with epilepsy [Kelly et al 2019].

DEE. The onset of seizures in children with DEE can be as early as the first day of life and is typically within the first three months of life, consistent with an early-infantile DEE (often consistent with the previously termed Ohtahara syndrome) [Nakamura et al 2013, Kelly et al 2019, Axeen et al 2021]. Infantile-onset seizures often manifest as epileptic spasms or tonic seizures. Drug-resistant focal seizures can also have onset from birth. Infantile spasms syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome are also described in older infants and children, and in some as an evolution of early-infantile DEE.

Seizures in those with DEE are typically drug resistant. Individuals have global developmental delay, axial hypotonia, and feeding difficulties in infancy. Development of abnormal movements (chorea, choreoathetosis, dystonia, ataxia, hyperkinetic crises) is variable and can occur months to years after an established diagnosis of epilepsy.

There is no specific EEG abnormality associated with GNAO1-related disorder. The EEG in individuals with epilepsy is often abnormal with focal or multifocal spikes and features of encephalopathy such as background slowing and absence of normal awake and sleep features. EEG findings may suggest a specific electroclinical syndrome such as burst suppression in early-infantile DEE, hypsarrhythmia in infantile spasms syndrome, or slow spike-and-wave with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Non-DEE epilepsy. Seizure onset is most often between ages three and ten years. Seizures are generalized tonic-clonic or focal. Some individuals have only a single seizure or well-controlled epilepsy on treatment with an ASM, which may contrast with their concurrent drug-resistant movement disorder. In this subset of individuals, other characteristic findings, including axial hypotonia, global developmental delay, early-onset feeding difficulties, and dyskinesia, precede seizure onset.

Developmental Delay and Intellectual Disability

During the first year of life, delay in motor development is significantly influenced by the severity of hypotonia. The more profound the hypotonia, the later the individuals achieve their motor milestones [Ananth et al 2016, Schorling et al 2017]. Severely affected individuals often lack head and/or trunk control and/or the ability to sit independently [Nakamura et al 2013].

Balance can be impaired due to axial muscular hypotonia, dystonic posturing of the neck, trunk, and extremities, and dyskinesia of the extremities. Although about 20% of individuals achieve independent ambulation, about 80% never do and depend on help for mobility [Saitsu et al 2016, Axeen et al 2021]. With the onset of involuntary movements, purposeful movements of the hands are often severely impaired.

Assessment of cognition is limited by the young age of many individuals and/or testing that typically depends on verbal communication and motor tasks [Kim et al 2020]. Therefore, formal tests of cognition can only be administered to individuals who have varying – but milder – degrees of disability. Recently, there have been attempts to assess cognitive impairment using an eye-tracking communication aid [Graziola et al 2021].

Despite the lack of expressive language, receptive language is often a relative strength [Graziola et al 2021, Domínguez-Carral et al 2023]. Some severely affected individuals can communicate with an eye-tracking communication aid or other communication aids [Axeen et al 2021, Graziola et al 2021, Thiel et al 2023].

The broad range of cognitive abilities in GNAO1-related disorder is highlighted by recent reports comparing individuals with a movement disorder phenotype and normal cognition or minimal intellectual disability [Krenn et al 2022, Liu et al 2022, Wirth et al 2022a, Galosi et al 2023, Thiel et al 2023] to individuals with DEE, who typically have severe to profound developmental delay and intellectual disability.

Movement Disorder

The vast majority of affected individuals have a hyperkinetic movement disorder [Kelly et al 2019, Schirinzi et al 2019, Axeen et al 2021]. The core features of the movement disorder are choreoathetosis and dystonia [Feng et al 2018], which can be severely disabling and painful. Complex motor stereotypies, ballism, myoclonus, facial dyskinesia, and ataxia have also been reported [Danti et al 2017, Axeen et al 2021].

Most individuals show a mixed pattern of persistent or paroxysmal dyskinesia that affect the whole body. Exacerbations of the hyperkinetic movement disorder, a characteristic feature, can occur spontaneously or can be triggered by intercurrent illnesses (e.g., febrile infections) as well as by emotional stress, excitement, voluntary movements, or change in position [Koy et al 2018]. They can last minutes, hours, days, or even weeks [Carecchio & Mencacci 2017].

Almost half of individuals experience prolonged exacerbations leading to life-threatening hyperkinetic crises (including status dystonicus), which are characterized by temporarily increased and nearly continuous involuntary movements or dystonic posturing. Accompanying problems can include impaired respiration, lack of sleep, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, autonomic dysregulation, and rhabdomyolysis [Saini et al 2022]. These hyperkinetic crises often require intensive medical management (see Treatment of Manifestations). Response to oral and intravenous medications is often limited. Recovery may take weeks to months.

Cervical and oropharyngeal dystonia, with involvement of the laryngeal muscles, can lead to dysarthria (60%-80%) or even anarthria (20%-30%) [Axeen et al 2021, Wirth et al 2022a].

Chewing and swallowing are often impaired due to involuntary or dysfunctional tongue movements and weakness of the jaw muscles. A subset of individuals (20%-40%) need help with feeding as they can eat only very small portions or food with a soft consistency. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or nasogastric feeding tube are often required (30%-50%) [Ananth et al 2016, Axeen et al 2021].

While the onset of movement disorders typically ranges from ages one to four years, some infants manifest movement disorders during the first weeks of life [Schirinzi et al 2019, Yang et al 2021]. In contrast, in some individuals with a milder phenotype, the movement disorder presents in the teens or adulthood [Wirth et al 2022a].

Individuals with symptom onset during early infancy and severe impairment of motor development are more likely to have hyperkinetic crises; in contrast, individuals with late onset and less severe motor impairment (i.e., are able to walk) and normal intellect or only mild intellectual disability appear to be at lower risk [Krenn et al 2022, Wirth et al 2022a, Thiel et al 2023].

Muscular Hypotonia

Significant axial hypotonia is often the first manifestation of GNA01-related disorder [Axeen et al 2021]. Hypotonia is mainly present in the neck and trunk, but also in the limbs, contributing to delays in motor development [Feng et al 2017, Wirth et al 2022a]. Some individuals have perioral hypotonia leading to insufficient closing of the mouth and reduced ability to chew solid food.

Other Common Features

Sleep disturbance, including difficulty with sleep initiation and sleep maintenance, is frequently reported and may be evident in infancy. It may or may not be related to concurrent epilepsy and movement disorder.

Gastrointestinal problems including constipation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and vomiting are very common. Along with the lower intake of food in those with a movement disorder (see Clinical Description, Movement Disorder), these problems can lead to poor weight gain and malnutrition, which increase morbidity in cachectic individuals. Although often described, the coexistent problem of cachexia is not well understood.

Neuroimaging

While most individuals (particularly children younger than age five years) have a normal brain MRI [Schirinzi et al 2019], some individuals have nonspecific abnormalities such as cortical and cerebellar atrophy, white matter abnormalities, and altered densities of the thalami and globus pallidi [Ananth et al 2016, Axeen et al 2021].

Prognosis

It is unknown whether life span in GNAO1-related disorder can be normal.

Although a number of deaths in children have been reported [Nakamura et al 2013, Ananth et al 2016, Danti et al 2017, Koy & Cirak et al 2018, Xiong et al 2018, Kwong et al 2021, Yang et al 2021, Li et al 2023], there are also many reports of young adults with GNAO1-related disorder, demonstrating that survival into adulthood is possible [Benato et al 2019, Kelly et al 2019, Wirth et al 2022a]. Since many adults with disabilities have not undergone advanced genetic testing, it is likely that adults with GNAO1-related disorder are underrecognized and underreported.

Deaths reported due to neurologic disease include the following:

While immune dysfunction has not been described in individuals with GNAO1-related disorder, infections (including respiratory infections) can aggravate the movement disorder, often resulting in hyperkinetic crises with need for hospitalization. Dysphagia and/or seizures can also increase risk of aspiration-related events that may require admission to a hospital and respiratory support.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

More than 200 individuals with pathogenic variants in GNAO1 have been reported in the literature to date.

To date, genotype-phenotype correlations have been described for several recurrent GNAO1 variants: one splicing variant and variants at five hot spot residues (p.Gly40, p.Gly203, p.Arg209, p.Glu237, and p.Glu246). These recurrent variants account for approximately half of affected individuals reported to date [Kelly et al 2019, Schirinzi et al 2019] (see Table 2).

In addition, accumulating data may point to haploinsufficiency variants being associated with milder phenotypes, without epileptic encephalopathy or severe global developmental delay or intellectual disability [Krenn et al 2022, Wirth et al 2022a, Wirth et al 2022b, Galosi et al 2023, Thiel et al 2023].

Table Icon

Table 2.

GNAO1-Related Disorder: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Prevalence

Approximately 200 individuals have been reported with GNAO1-related disorder to date. However, this disorder may be underreported, particularly given the recent reports of individuals with milder phenotypes [Wirth et al 2022a].

Differential Diagnosis

The phenotypic features associated with GNAO1-related disorder are not sufficient to diagnose this condition clinically.

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. All disorders with infantile-onset severe seizures, central hypotonia, global developmental delay, and severe intellectual disability should be considered in the differential diagnosis. See OMIM Phenotypic Series: Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.

Dystonia. See Hereditary Dystonia Overview for genes associated with dystonia.

Movement disorder with epilepsy. Examples of other genes associated with both seizures and paroxysmal hyperkinetic, dystonic, and/or choreiform movement disorder phenotypes include the following [Papandreou et al 2020, de Gusmão et al 2021]:

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for GNAO1-related disorder have been published.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with GNAO1-related disorder, the evaluations summarized in Table 3 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to diagnosis) are recommended.

Table Icon

Table 3.

GNAO1-Related Disorder: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

Treatment of Manifestations

There is no cure for GNAO1-related disorder. Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications can include multidisciplinary care by specialists in child neurology, adult neurology, neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, orthopedic surgery, speech-language therapy, and psychology (see Table 4).

Table Icon

Table 4.

GNAO1-Related Disorder: Treatment of Manifestations

Prolonged exacerbation of the hyperkinetic movement disorder requires hospitalization and, when severe, intensive care management. Infections or catabolic states are often triggers, while in some individuals, potential causes are unknown. The often poor nutritional status due to feeding problems can prolong hospital stays.

Although sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) has not specifically been reported in GNAO1-related disorder, generally recommended practices to reduce the risk of SUDEP include reduction in the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures when possible, adherence to anti-seizure medication, and nocturnal supervision [Trivisano et al 2022].

While immune dysfunction has not been described in GNAO1-related disorder, infections can lead to hyperkinetic crises and need for hospitalization. Dysphagia and seizures can increase the risk of aspiration-related events, which may result in hospitalization for respiratory support.

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • IEP services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • Special education law requires that children participating in an IEP be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible, when and where appropriate.
    • Hearing consultants should be a part of the child's IEP team to support access to academic material.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Motor Dysfunction

Gross motor dysfunction

  • Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility and to reduce the risk for later-onset orthopedic complications (e.g., contractures, scoliosis, hip dislocation).
  • Consider use of durable medical equipment and positioning devices as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).
  • For increased muscle tone like in dystonia, consider involving appropriate specialists to aid in management of tone reduction by pharmacotherapy, or orthopedic procedures.

Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.

Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.

Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development.

Surveillance

To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the evaluations summarized in Table 5 are recommended.

Table Icon

Table 5.

GNAO1-Related Disorder: Surveillance

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Using Caenorhabditis elegans models of two specific GNAO1 variants, researchers found that caffeine reduced abnormal movements [Di Rocco et al 2023]. This finding has not yet been explored with other variants, in other model systems, or in humans with GNAO1-related disorder.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

GNAO1-related disorder is an autosomal dominant disorder most often caused by a de novo pathogenic variant. Individuals with a severe phenotype (i.e., developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, severe developmental delay and/or intellectual disability, and/or early-onset movement disorder) typically represent simplex cases (i.e., the only family member known to be affected) and have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant. However, recurrence of severe phenotypes in affected sibs due to presumed parental germline mosaicism has been reported [Kulkarni et al 2016, Schorling et al 2017].

Vertical transmission from an affected parent to an affected child has been reported in several families with milder phenotypes [Wirth et al 2022a].

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • Almost all probands reported to date with severe GNAO1-related disorder phenotypes whose parents have undergone molecular genetic testing have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant or a pathogenic variant inherited from an unaffected, mosaic parent.
  • Some probands with milder GNAO1-related disorder phenotypes have the disorder as the result of a pathogenic variant inherited from an affected parent.
  • Molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of the proband to evaluate their genetic status and inform recurrence risk assessment.
  • If the pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, the following possibilities should be considered:

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the genetic status of the proband's parents:

Offspring of a proband

  • Each child of an individual with GNAO1-related disorder has a 50% chance of inheriting the GNAO1 pathogenic variant. Three individuals with milder phenotypes, including normal intellect and no seizures, have been documented to have had affected children [Wirth et al 2020, Wirth et al 2022a].
  • Individuals with severe GNAO1-related disorder phenotypes are not known to reproduce.

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the genetic status of the proband's parents: if a parent has the GNAO1 pathogenic variant, the parent's family members may be at risk.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to parents of affected individuals.

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the GNAO1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table Icon

Table A.

GNAO1-Related Disorder: Genes and Databases

Table Icon

Table B.

OMIM Entries for GNAO1-Related Disorder (View All in OMIM)

Molecular Pathogenesis

GNAO1 encodes guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(o) subunit alpha, the alpha subunit of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins o (Gαo). Heterotrimeric G proteins are a large family of signal-transducing proteins, essential for the function of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Together, the subunits α, β, and γ form the heterotrimeric G protein complex. Gα is responsible for binding to guanine nucleotides (GDP and GTP) and to cognate GPCRs [Savitsky et al 2020].

Gαo, the major G protein α subunit in the nervous system, is essential for nervous system development and functionality [Bromberg et al 2008, Solis & Katanaev 2017]. Gαo couples to inhibitory GPCRs such as α2-adrenergic, D2 dopamine, μ-opioid, somatostatin, and M2-muscarinic. The activation of GPCRs through GDP results in a release of Gßγ and Gα-GTP [Pierce et al 2002]. Gαo modulates the responsiveness of adenyl cyclase type 5 (AC5) to stimulatory Gαs/olf inputs by controlling the release of Gßγ [Muntean et al 2021], and therefore regulates the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). The manifestations of movement disorders are caused by a reduced level of cAMP, as previously proven with ADCY5 variants (see ADCY5 Dyskinesia) that reduce the activity of AC5 [Carapito et al 2015, Chang et al 2016].

Mechanism of disease causation. Different molecular mechanisms explain the disease-causing mechanisms of different GNAO1 variants.

Muntean et al [2021] proposed a model in which the majority of variants show loss-of-function behavior in transmission of GPCR signals from distinct mechanisms that affect the G protein cycle, including impairment in binding to Gβγ and inability to promote downstream signaling. Furthermore, Muntean et al [2021] demonstrated that some variants also showed dominant-negative effects that interfered with the function of normal Gαo. They concluded that the combination of these two mechanisms disrupt the GPCR signaling.

Larasati et al [2022] showed that displacement of Gln205, which is critical for GTP hydrolysis, in GNAO1 variants that affect codons Gly203, Arg209, or Glu246 accelerates GTP uptake and inactivates GTP hydrolysis. Although this leads to constitutive GTP binding by Gαo, the variants fail to adopt the activated conformation and display aberrant interactions with signaling partners. The deficit in binding and hydrolyzing GTP was also found in variants affecting the Gln52 codon [Solis et al 2021].

Table Icon

Table 6.

GNAO1 Pathogenic Variants Referenced in This GeneReview

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

All authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Lauren C Briere, MS CGC

Department of Pediatrics and Center for Genomic Medicine

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Email: ude.dravrah.hgm@ereirbl

Lauren is a Genetic Counselor and Study Coordinator for the Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Harvard Clinical Site, Massachusetts General Hospital. She has extensive experience in prenatal and general genetics counseling and a focus on rare and undiagnosed diseases and variant interpretation.

Dr Moritz Thiel

University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne Germany

Email: ed.nleok-ku@leiht.ztirom

Dr Thiel is a resident in pediatric neurology and a clinician-scientist with a research focus on GNAO1. He hosts the German GNAO1 registry and recruits for the international Natural History of GNAO1-Associated Neurologic Disease study (PI: Amy Viehoever) in Europe.

Web page: kinderklinik.uk-koeln.de/erkrankungen-therapien/neuropaediatrie/bewegungsstoerungen/

Dr David Sweetser

Chief of Medical Genetics and Metabolism

MGH Site Director Undiagnosed Diseases Network

Co-Director Harvard Affiliated Hospitals NORD Rare Disease Center of Excellence

Department of Pediatrics and Center for Genomic Medicine

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Dr Sweetser is a biochemical and medical genetics clinician-researcher with a focus on understanding and diagnosing rare and undiagnosed diseases. He has a clinical and research focus on rare neurodevelopmental disorders.

Web pages:

Dr Anne Koy

Consultant Pediatric Neurology

University hospital of cologne, cologne, germany

email: ed.nleok-ku@yok.enna

Dr Koy is a pediatric neurologist and clinician-scientist with a clinical and research interest in movement disorders and deep brain stimulation in children. She is involved in the German GNAO1 registry and the international Natural History of GNAO1-Associated Neurologic Disease study (PI: Amy Viehoever) in Europe.

Web page: kinderklinik.uk-koeln.de/erkrankungen-therapien/neuropaediatrie/bewegungsstoerungen/

Dr Erika Axeen

Assistant Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of Virginia

Email: ude.ainigriv@h2ate

Dr Axeen is a pediatric neurologist and epileptologist with an interest in genetic epilepsies. She serves on the scientific advisory board for the Bow Foundation and is the epileptologist for the Natural History of GNAO1-Associated Neurologic Disease study (PI: Amy Viehoever) and is working to further describe GNAO1-related epilepsy.

Web pages:

Drs Thiel, Koy, and Axeen are actively involved in clinical research regarding individuals with GNAO1-related disorder. They would be happy to communicate with persons who have any questions regarding diagnosis of GNAO1-related disorder or other considerations. They may be contacted to inquire about review of GNAO1 variants of uncertain significance.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank all the patients and their families for taking part in different studies, trials, and registries all around the world. We would also like to thank the parents for supporting scientists focusing on GNAO1. These efforts enlarged the understanding of this ultra-rare disease.

Dr Axeen has received a grant from the Bow Foundation in support of her ongoing work with GNAO1-related disorder. Dr Sweetser would also like to acknowledge the support of the Caitlin and Rich Hill Family Fund for Undiagnosed Diseases and the American Institute for Neuro Integrative Development (AIND) for their support of rare disease research at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Revision History

  • 9 November 2023 (bp) Review posted live
  • 21 February 2023 (ds) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Akasaka M, Kamei A, Tanifuji S, Asami M, Ito J, Mizuma K, Oyama K, Tokutomi T, Yamamoto K, Fukushima A, Takenouchi T, Uehara T, Suzuki H, Kosaki K. GNAO1 mutation-related severe involuntary movements treated with gabapentin. Brain Dev. 2021;43:576-9. [PubMed: 33358199]

  • Al Masseri Z, AlSayed M. Gonadal mosaicism in GNAO1 causing neurodevelopmental disorder with involuntary movements; two additional variants. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2022;31:100864. [PMC free article: PMC9248221] [PubMed: 35782616]

  • Ananth AL, Robichaux-Viehoever A, Kim Y-M, Hanson-Kahn A, Cox R, Enns GM, Strober J, Willing M, Schlaggar BL, Wu YW, Bernstein JA. Clinical course of six children with GNAO1 mutations causing a severe and distinctive movement disorder. Pediatr Neurol. 2016;59:81-4. [PubMed: 27068059]

  • Apuzzo D, Cappuccio G, Vaisanen T, Alagia M, Pignataro P, Genesio R, Brunetti-Pierri N. Two cases of 16q12.1q21 deletions and refinement of the critical region. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:103878. [PubMed: 32045705]

  • Arisaka A, Nakashima M, Kumada S, Inoue K, Nishida H, Mashimo H, Kashii H, Kato M, Maruyama K, Okumura A, Saitsu H, Matsumoto N, Fukuda M. Association of early-onset epileptic encephalopathy with involuntary movements - case series and literature review. Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2020;15:100417. [PMC free article: PMC7808918] [PubMed: 33490948]

  • Arya R, Spaeth C, Gilbert DL, Leach JL, Holland KD. GNAO1-associated epileptic encephalopathy and movement disorders: c.607G>A variant represents a probable mutation hotspot with a distinct phenotype. Epileptic Disord. 2017;19:67-75. [PubMed: 28202424]

  • Axeen E, Bell E, Robichaux Viehoever A, Schreiber JM, Sidiropoulos C, Goodkin HP. Results of the first GNAO1-related neurodevelopmental disorders caregiver survey. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;121:28-32. [PubMed: 34139551]

  • Benato A, Carecchio M, Burlina A, Paoloni F, Sartori S, Nosadini M, d'Avella D, Landi A, Antonini A. Long-term effect of subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for status dystonicus in children with methylmalonic acidemia and GNAO1 mutation. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2019;126:739-57. [PubMed: 31076915]

  • Blumkin L, Lerman-Sagie T, Westenberger A, Ben-Pazi H, Zerem A, Yosovich K, Lev D. Multiple causes of pediatric early onset chorea--clinical and genetic approach. Neuropediatrics. 2018;49:246-55. [PubMed: 29801190]

  • Bromberg KD, Iyengar R, He JC. Regulation of neurite outgrowth by G(i/o) signaling pathways. Front Biosci. 2008;13:4544-57. [PMC free article: PMC3068557] [PubMed: 18508528]

  • Bruun TUJ, DesRoches CL, Wilson D, Chau V, Nakagawa T, Yamasaki M, Hasegawa S, Fukao T, Marshall C, Mercimek-Andrews S. Prospective cohort study for identification of underlying genetic causes in neonatal encephalopathy using whole-exome sequencing. Genet Med. 2018;20:486-94. [PubMed: 28817111]

  • Carapito R, Paul N, Untrau M, Le Gentil M, Ott L, Alsaleh G, Jochem P, Radosavljevic M, Le Caignec C, David A, Damier P, Isidor B, Bahram S. A de novo ADCY5 mutation causes early-onset autosomal dominant chorea and dystonia. Mov Disord. 2015;30:423-7. [PubMed: 25545163]

  • Carecchio M, Mencacci NE. Emerging monogenic complex hyperkinetic disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017;17:97. [PMC free article: PMC5662693] [PubMed: 29086067]

  • Chaib H, Schoene-Bake JC, Saryyeva A, Jack T, Hartmann H, Krauss JK. DBS emergency surgery for treatment of dystonic storm associated with rhabdomyolysis and acute colitis in DYT-GNAO1. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022;38:1821-24. [PMC free article: PMC9463340] [PubMed: 35725943]

  • Chang CF, Li LH, Wang CH, Tsai FJ, Chen TC, Wu JY, Chen YT, Tsai AC. Identification of a submicroscopic 3.2 Mb chromosomal 16q12.2-13 deletion in a child with short stature, mild developmental delay, and craniofacial anomalies, by high-density oligonucleotide array-a recognizable syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:2365-71. [PubMed: 20803649]

  • Chang FCF, Westenberger A, Dale RC, Smith M, Pall HS, Perez-Dueñas B, Grattan-Smith P, Ouvrier RA, Mahant N, Hanna BC, Hunter M, Lawson JA, Max C, Sachdev R, Meyer E, Crimmins D, Pryor D, Morris JGL, Münchau A, Grozeva D, Carss KJ, Raymond L, Kurian MA, Klein C, Fung VSC. Phenotypic insights into ADCY5-associated disease. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1033-40. [PMC free article: PMC4950003] [PubMed: 27061943]

  • Chopra M, Gable DL, Love-Nichols J, Tsao A, Rockowitz S, Sliz P, Barkoudah E, Bastianelli L, Coulter D, Davidson E, DeGusmao C, Fogelman D, Huth K, Marshall P, Nimec D, Sanders JS, Shore BJ, Snyder B, Stone SSD, Ubeda A, Watkins C, Berde C, Bolton J, Brownstein C, Costigan M, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Lai A, O'Donnell-Luria A, Paciorkowski AR, Pinto A, Pugh J, Rodan L, Roe E, Swanson L, Zhang B, Kruer MC, Sahin M, Poduri A, Srivastava S. Mendelian etiologies identified with whole exome sequencing in cerebral palsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022;9:193-205. [PMC free article: PMC8862420] [PubMed: 35076175]

  • Danti FR, Galosi S, Romani M, Montomoli M, Carss KJ, Lucy Raymond F, Parrini E, Bianchini C, McShane T, Dale RC, Mohammad SS, Shah U, Mahant N, Ng J, McTague A, Samanta R, Vadlamani G, Valente EM, Leuzzi V, Kurian MA, Guerrini R. GNAO1 encephalopathy: broadening the phenotype and evaluating treatment and outcome. Neurol Genet. 2017;3:e143. [PMC free article: PMC5362187] [PubMed: 28357411]

  • de Gusmão CM, Garcia L, Mikati MA, Su S, Silveira-Moriyama L. Paroxysmal genetic movement disorders and epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2021;12:648031. [PMC free article: PMC8021799] [PubMed: 33833732]

  • de Kovel CGF, Brilstra EH, Van Kempen MJA, Van't Slot R, Nijman IJ, Afawi Z, De Jonghe P, Djémié T, Guerrini R, Hardies K, Helbig I, Hendrickx R, Kanaan M, Kramer U, Lehesjoki AEE, Lemke JR, Marini C, Mei D, Møller RS, Pendziwiat M, Stamberger H, Suls A, Weckhuysen S, Balling R, Barisic N, Baulac S, Caglayan HS, Craiu DC, Depienne C, Gormley P, Hjalgrim H, Hoffman-Zacharska D, Jähn J, Klein KM, Komarek V, LeGuern E, Lerche H, May P, Muhle H, Pal D, Palotie A, Rosenow F, Selmer K, Serratosa JM, Sisodiya SM, Stephani U, Sterbova K, Striano P, Talvik T, van Haelst M, Verbeek N, von Spiczak S, Weber YG, Koeleman BPC. Targeted sequencing of 351 candidate genes for epileptic encephalopathy in a large cohort of patients. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2016;4:568-80. [PMC free article: PMC5023942] [PubMed: 27652284]

  • Dhamija R, Mink JW, Shah BB, Goodkin HP. GNAO1-Associated Movement Disorder. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016;3:615-7. [PMC free article: PMC6353469] [PubMed: 30838255]

  • Di Rocco M, Galosi S, Follo FC, Lanza E, Folli V, Martire A, Leuzzi V, Martinelli S. Phenotypic assessment of pathogenic variants in GNAO1 and response to caffeine in C. elegans models of the disease. Genes (Basel). 2023;14:319. [PMC free article: PMC9957173] [PubMed: 36833246]

  • Domínguez-Carral J, Ludlam WG, Junyent Segarra M, Fornaguera Marti M, Balsells S, Muchart J, Čokolić Petrović D, Espinoza I, Ortigoza-Escobar JD, Martemyanov KA, et al. Severity of GNAO1-related disorder correlates with changes in G-protein function. Ann Neurol. 2023;94:987-1004. [PMC free article: PMC10681096] [PubMed: 37548038]

  • Dzinovic I, Škorvánek M, Necpál J, Boesch S, Švantnerová J, Wagner M, Havránková P, Pavelekova P, Haň V, Janzarik WG, Berweck S, Diebold I, Kuster A, Jech R, Winkelmann J, Zech M. Dystonia as a prominent presenting feature in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: a case series. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021;90:73-8. [PubMed: 34399161]

  • EuroEPINOMICS-RES Consortium, et al. De novo mutations in synaptic transmission genes including DNM1 cause epileptic encephalopathies. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95:360-70. [PMC free article: PMC4185114] [PubMed: 25262651]

  • Feng H, Khalil S, Neubig RR, Sidiropoulos C. A mechanistic review on GNAO1-associated movement disorder. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;116:131-41. [PubMed: 29758257]

  • Feng H, Sjögren B, Karaj B, Shaw V, Gezer A, Neubig RR. Movement disorder in GNAO1 encephalopathy associated with gain-of-function mutations. Neurology. 2017;89:762-70. [PMC free article: PMC5580866] [PubMed: 28747448]

  • Fung EL, Mo CY, Fung ST, Chan AY, Lau KY, Chan EK, Chan DY, Zhu XL, Chan DT, Poon WS. Deep brain stimulation in a young child with GNAO1 mutation - feasible and helpful. Surg Neurol Int. 2022;13:285. [PMC free article: PMC9282786] [PubMed: 35855141]

  • Galosi S, Novelli M, Di Rocco M, Flex E, Messina E, Pollini L, Parrini E, Pisani F, Guerrini R, Leuzzi V, Martinelli S. GNAO1 haploinsufficiency: the milder end of the GNAO1 phenotypic spectrum. Mov Disord. 2023. Epub ahead of print. [PubMed: 37632268]

  • Gambardella ML, Pede E, Orazi L, Leone S, Quintiliani M, Amorelli GM, Petrianni M, Galanti M, Amore F, Musto E, Perulli M, Contaldo I, Veredice C, Mercuri EM, Battaglia DI, Ricci D. Visual function in children with GNAO1-related encephalopathy. Genes (Basel). 2023;14:544. [PMC free article: PMC10047968] [PubMed: 36980817]

  • Garofalo M, Beudel M, Dijk JM, Bonouvrié LA, Buizer AI, Geytenbeek J, Prins RHN, Schuurman PR, van de Pol LA. Elective and emergency deep brain stimulation in refractory pediatric monogenetic movement disorders presenting with dystonia: current practice illustrated by two cases. Neuropediatrics. 2023;54:44-52. [PMC free article: PMC9842449] [PubMed: 36223877]

  • Gawlinski P, Posmyk R, Gambin T, Sielicka D, Chorazy M, Nowakowska B, Jhangiani SN, Muzny DM, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M, Bal J, Boerwinkle E, Gibbs RA, Lupski JR, Wiszniewski W. PEHO syndrome may represent phenotypic expansion at the severe end of the early-onset encephalopathies. Pediatr Neurol. 2016;60:83-7. [PMC free article: PMC5125779] [PubMed: 27343026]

  • Graziola F, Garone G, Grasso M, Capuano A. Cognitive assessment in GNAO1 neurodevelopmental disorder using an eye tracking system. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3541. [PMC free article: PMC8397136] [PubMed: 34441836]

  • Helbig KL, Farwell Hagman KD, Shinde DN, Mroske C, Powis Z, Li S, Tang S, Helbig I. Diagnostic exome sequencing provides a molecular diagnosis for a significant proportion of patients with epilepsy. Genet Med. 2016;18:898-905. [PubMed: 26795593]

  • Honey CM, Malhotra AK, Tarailo-Graovac M, van Karnebeek CDM, Horvath G, Sulistyanto A. GNAO1 mutation–induced pediatric dystonic storm rescue with pallidal deep brain stimulation. J Child Neurol. 2018;33:413-6. [PubMed: 29661126]

  • Hu W, Fang H, Tang J, Zhou Z, Wu L. [Genetic analysis of a child with early onset neurodevelopmental disorder with involuntary movement and a literature review]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2023;40:385-9. [PubMed: 36972929]

  • Kelly M, Park M, Mihalek I, Rochtus A, Gramm M, Pérez-Palma E, Axeen ET, Hung CY, Olson H, Swanson L, Anselm I, Briere LC, High FA, Sweetser DA, Kayani S, Snyder M, Calvert S, Scheffer IE, Yang E, Waugh JL, Lal D, Bodamer O, Poduri A. Spectrum of neurodevelopmental disease associated with the GNAO1 guanosine triphosphate–binding region. Epilepsia. 2019;60:406-18. [PMC free article: PMC6452443] [PubMed: 30682224]

  • Kim SY, Shim YK, Ko YJ, Park S, Jang SS, Lim BC, Kim KJ, Chae JH. Spectrum of movement disorders in GNAO1 encephalopathy: in-depth phenotyping and case-by-case analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15:343. [PMC free article: PMC7724837] [PubMed: 33298085]

  • Koval A, Larasati YA, Savitsky M, Solis GP, Good JM, Quinodoz M, Rivolta C, Superti-Furga A, Katanaev VL. In-depth molecular profiling of an intronic GNAO1 mutant as the basis for personalized high-throughput drug screening. Med. 2023;4:311-325.e7. [PubMed: 37001522]

  • Koy A, Cirak S, Gonzalez V, Becker K, Roujeau T, Milesi C, Baleine J, Cambonie G, Boularan A, Greco F, Perrigault PF, Cances C, Dorison N, Doummar D, Roubertie A, Beroud C, Körber F, Stüve B, Waltz S, Mignot C, Nava C, Maarouf M, Coubes P, Cif L. Deep brain stimulation is effective in pediatric patients with GNAO1 associated severe hyperkinesia. J Neurol Sci. 2018;391:31-9. [PubMed: 30103967]

  • Krenn M, Sommer R, Sycha T, Zech M. GNAO1 haploinsufficiency associated with a mild delayed-onset dystonia phenotype. Mov Disord. 2022;37:2464-6. [PubMed: 36273395]

  • Krygier M, Zawadzka M, Sawicka A, Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M. Reflex seizures in rare monogenic epilepsies. Seizure. 2022;97:32-4. [PubMed: 35305402]

  • Kulkarni N, Tang S, Bhardwaj R, Bernes S, Grebe TA. Progressive movement disorder in brothers carrying a GNAO1 mutation responsive to deep brain stimulation. J Child Neurol. 2016;31:211-4. [PubMed: 26060304]

  • Kwong AK, Tsang MH, Fung JL, Mak CC, Chan KL, Rodenburg RJT, Lek M, Huang S, Pajusalu S, Yau MM, Tsoi C, Fung S, Liu KT, Ma CK, Wong S, Yau EK, Tai SM, Fung EL, Wu NS, Tsung LY, Smeitink J, Chung BH, Fung CW. Exome sequencing in paediatric patients with movement disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:32. [PMC free article: PMC7809769] [PubMed: 33446253]

  • Larasati YA, Savitsky M, Koval A, Solis GP, Valnohova J, Katanaev VL. Restoration of the GTPase activity and cellular interactions of Gαo mutants by Zn2+ in GNAO1 encephalopathy models. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabn9350. [PMC free article: PMC9544338] [PubMed: 36206333]

  • Lasa-Aranzasti A, Cazurro-Gutiérrez A, Bescós A, González V, Ispierto L, Tardáguila M, Valenzuela I, Plaja A, Moreno-Galdó A, Macaya-Ruiz A, Pérez-Dueñas B. 16q12.2q21 deletion: a newly recognized cause of dystonia related to GNAO1 haploinsufficiency. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022;103:112-4. [PubMed: 36096018]

  • Law CY, Chang ST, Cho SY, Yau EK, Ng GS, Fong NC, Lam CW. Clinical whole-exome sequencing reveals a novel missense pathogenic variant of GNAO1 in a patient with infantile-onset epilepsy. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;451:292-6. [PubMed: 26485252]

  • Lee J, Park JE, Lee C, Kim AR, Kim BJ, Park WY, Ki CS, Lee J. Genomic analysis of Korean patient with microcephaly. Front Genet. 2021;11:543528. [PMC free article: PMC7876370] [PubMed: 33584783]

  • Li Y, Chen H, Li L, Cao X, Ding X, Chen L, Cao D. Phenotypes in children with GNAO1 encephalopathy in China. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1086970. [PMC free article: PMC10495587] [PubMed: 37705601]

  • Liu Y, Zhang Q, Wang J, Liu J, Yang W, Yan X, Ouyang Y, Yang H. Both subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation are effective for GNAO1-associated dystonia: three case reports and a literature review. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2022;15:17562864221093507. [PMC free article: PMC9058460] [PubMed: 35509770]

  • Malaquias MJ, Fineza I, Loureiro L, Cardoso L, Alonso I, Magalhães M. GNAO1 mutation presenting as dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Neurol Sci. 2019;40:2213-6. [PubMed: 31190250]

  • Marcé-Grau A, Dalton J, López-Pisón J, García-Jiménez MC, Monge-Galindo L, Cuenca-León E, Giraldo J, Macaya A. GNAO1 encephalopathy: further delineation of a severe neurodevelopmental syndrome affecting females. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:38. [PMC free article: PMC4830060] [PubMed: 27072799]

  • Menke LA, Engelen M, Alders M, Odekerken VJ, Baas F, Cobben JM. Recurrent GNAO1 mutations associated with developmental delay and a movement disorder. J Child Neurol. 2016;31:1598-601. [PubMed: 27625011]

  • Miyamoto S, Nakashima M, Fukumura S, Kumada S, Saitsu H. An intronic GNAO1 variant leading to in-frame insertion cause movement disorder controlled by deep brain stimulation. Neurogenetics. 2022;23:129-35. [PubMed: 35147852]

  • Muir AM, Myers CT, Nguyen NT, Saykally J, Craiu D, De Jonghe P, Helbig I, Hoffman-Zacharska D, Guerrini R, Lehesjoki AE, Marini C, Møller RS, Serratosa J, Štěrbová K, Striano P, von Spiczak S, Weckhuysen S, Mefford HC. Genetic heterogeneity in infantile spasms. Epilepsy Res. 2019;156:106181. [PMC free article: PMC6814289] [PubMed: 31394400]

  • Muntean BS, Masuho I, Dao M, Sutton LP, Zucca S, Iwamoto H, Patil DN, Wang D, Birnbaumer L, Blakely RD, Grill B, Martemyanov KA. Gαo is a major determinant of cAMP signaling in the pathophysiology of movement disorders. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108718. [PMC free article: PMC7903328] [PubMed: 33535037]

  • Nakamura K, Kodera H, Akita T, Shiina M, Kato M, Hoshino H, Terashima H, Osaka H, Nakamura S, Tohyama J, Kumada T, Furukawa T, Iwata S, Shiihara T, Kubota M, Miyatake S, Koshimizu E, Nishiyama K, Nakashima M, Tsurusaki Y, Miyake N, Hayasaka K, Ogata K, Fukuda A, Matsumoto N, Saitsu H. De Novo mutations in GNAO1, encoding a Gαo subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins, cause epileptic encephalopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:496-505. [PMC free article: PMC3769919] [PubMed: 23993195]

  • Novelli M, Galosi S, Zorzi G, Martinelli S, Capuano A, Nardecchia F, Granata T, Pollini L, Di Rocco M, Marras CE, Nardocci N, Leuzzi V. GNAO1-related movement disorder: an update on phenomenology, clinical course, and response to treatments. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2023;111:105405. [PubMed: 37142469]

  • Okumura A, Maruyama K, Shibata M, Kurahashi H, Ishii A, Numoto S, Hirose S, Kawai T, Iso M, Kataoka S, Okuno Y, Muramatsu H, Kojima S. A patient with a GNAO1 mutation with decreased spontaneous movements, hypotonia, and dystonic features. Brain Dev. 2018;40:926-30. [PubMed: 29935962]

  • Papandreou A, Danti FR, Spaull R, Leuzzi V, Mctague A, Kurian MA. The expanding spectrum of movement disorders in genetic epilepsies. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62:178-91. [PubMed: 31784983]

  • Pérez-Dueñas B, Gorman K, Marcé-Grau A, Ortigoza-Escobar JD, Macaya A, Danti FR, Barwick K, Papandreou A, Ng J, Meyer E, Mohammad SS, Smith M, Muntoni F, Munot P, Uusimaa J, Vieira P, Sheridan E, Guerrini R, Cobben J, Yilmaz S, De Grandis E, Dale RC, Pons R, Peall KJ, Leuzzi V, Kurian MA. The genetic landscape of complex childhood-onset hyperkinetic movement disorders. Mov Disord. 2022;37:2197-209. [PMC free article: PMC9804670] [PubMed: 36054588]

  • Pierce KL, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:639-50. [PubMed: 12209124]

  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]

  • Rim JH, Kim SH, Hwang IS, Kwon SS, Kim J, Kim HW, Cho MJ, Ko A, Youn SE, Kim J, Lee YM, Chung HJ, Lee JS, Kim HD, Choi JR, Lee ST, Kang HC. Efficient strategy for the molecular diagnosis of intractable early-onset epilepsy using targeted gene sequencing. BMC Med genomics. 2018;11:6. [PMC free article: PMC5796507] [PubMed: 29390993]

  • Saini AG, Hassan I, Sharma K, Muralidharan J, Dhawan S, Saini L, Suthar R, Sahu J, Sankhyan N, Singhi P. Status dystonicus in children: a cross-sectional study and review of literature. J Child Neurol. 2022;37:441-50. [PubMed: 35253510]

  • Saitsu H, Fukai R, Ben-Zeev B, Sakai Y, Mimaki M, Okamoto N, Suzuki Y, Monden Y, Saito H, Tziperman B, Torio M, Akamine S, Takahashi N, Osaka H, Yamagata T, Nakamura K, Tsurusaki Y, Nakashima M, Miyake N, Shiina M, Ogata K, Matsumoto N. Phenotypic spectrum of GNAO1 variants: epileptic encephalopathy to involuntary movements with severe developmental delay. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:129-34. [PMC free article: PMC4795232] [PubMed: 25966631]

  • Savitsky M, Solis GP, Kryuchkov M, Katanaev VL. Humanization of drosophila Gαo to model GNAO1 paediatric encephalopathies. Biomedicines. 2020;8:1-16. [PMC free article: PMC7599900] [PubMed: 33036271]

  • Schirinzi T, Garone G, Travaglini L, Vasco G, Galosi S, Rios L, Castiglioni C, Barassi C, Battaglia D, Gambardella ML, Cantonetti L, Graziola F, Marras CE, Castelli E, Bertini E, Capuano A, Leuzzi V. Phenomenology and clinical course of movement disorder in GNAO1 variants: results from an analytical review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;61:19-25. [PubMed: 30642806]

  • Schorling DC, Dietel T, Evers C, Hinderhofer K, Korinthenberg R, Ezzo D, Bönnemann CG, Kirschner J. Expanding phenotype of de novo mutations in GNAO1: four new cases and review of literature. Neuropediatrics. 2017;48:371-7. [PubMed: 28628939]

  • Solis GP, Katanaev VL. Gαo (GNAO1) encephalopathies: plasma membrane vs. Golgi functions. Oncotarget. 2017;9:23846-7. [PMC free article: PMC5963625] [PubMed: 29844856]

  • Solis GP, Kozhanova TV, Koval A, Zhilina SS, Mescheryakova TI, Abramov AA, Ishmuratov EV, Bolshakova ES, Osipova KV, Ayvazyan SO, Lebon S, Kanivets IV, Pyankov DV, Troccaz S, Silachev DN, Zavadenko NN, Prityko AG, Katanaev VL. Pediatric encephalopathy: clinical, biochemical and cellular insights into the role of Gln52 of GNAO1 and GNAI1 for the dominant disease. Cells. 2021;10:2749. [PMC free article: PMC8535069] [PubMed: 34685729]

  • Takezawa Y, Kikuchi A, Haginoya K, Niihori T, Numata-Uematsu Y, Inui T, Yamamura-Suzuki S, Miyabayashi T, Anzai M, Suzuki-Muromoto S, Okubo Y, Endo W, Togashi N, Kobayashi Y, Onuma A, Funayama R, Shirota M, Nakayama K, Aoki Y, Kure S. Genomic analysis identifies masqueraders of full-term cerebral palsy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5:538-551. [PMC free article: PMC5945967] [PubMed: 29761117]

  • Talvik I, Møller RS, Vaher M, Vaher U, Larsen LHG, Dahl HA, Ilves P, Talvik T. Clinical phenotype of de novo GNAO1 mutation: case report and review of literature. Child Neurol Open. 2015;2:2329048X1558371-2329048X1558371. [PMC free article: PMC5417033] [PubMed: 28503590]

  • Thiel M, Bamborschke D, Janzarik WG, Assmann B, Zittel S, Patzer S, Auhuber A, Opp J, Matzker E, Bevot A, Seeger J, van Baalen A, Stüve B, Brockmann K, Cirak S, Koy A. Genotype-phenotype correlation and treatment effects in young patients with GNAO1-associated disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023;94:806-15. [PubMed: 37225406]

  • Trivisano M, Muccioli L, Ferretti A, Lee HF, Chi CS, Bisulli F. Risk of SUDEP during infancy. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;131:107896. [PubMed: 33741238]

  • Turro E, Astle WJ, Megy K, Gräf S, Greene D, Shamardina O, Allen HL, Sanchis-Juan A, Frontini M, Thys C, Stephens J, Mapeta R, Burren OS, Downes K, Haimel M, Tuna S, Deevi SVV, Aitman TJ, Bennett DL, Calleja P, Carss K, Caulfield MJ, Chinnery PF, Dixon PH, Gale DP, James R, Koziell A, Laffan MA, Levine AP, Maher ER, Markus HS, Morales J, Morrell NW, Mumford AD, Ormondroyd E, Rankin S, Rendon A, Richardson S, Roberts I, Roy NBA, Saleem MA, Smith KGC, Stark H, Tan RYY, Themistocleous AC, Thrasher AJ, Watkins H, Webster AR, Wilkins MR, Williamson C, Whitworth J, Humphray S, Bentley DR, Kingston N, Walker N, Bradley JR, Ashford S, Penkett CJ, Freson K, Stirrups KE, Raymond FL, Ouwehand WH, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of patients with rare diseases in a national health system. Nature. 2020;583:96-102. [PMC free article: PMC7610553] [PubMed: 32581362]

  • Vasconcellos LF, Soares VP, de Ricchezza LL. Dystonic cerebral palsy phenotype due to GNAO1 variant responsive to levodopa. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2023;13:11. [PMC free article: PMC10077974] [PubMed: 37034444]

  • Waak M, Mohammad SS, Coman D, Sinclair K, Copeland L, Silburn P, Coyne T, McGill J, O'Regan M, Selway R, Symonds J, Grattan-Smith P, Lin JP, Dale RC, Malone S. GNAO1-related movement disorder with life-threatening exacerbations: movement phenomenology and response to DBS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89:221-2. [PubMed: 28668776]

  • Wirth T, Garone G, Kurian MA, Piton A, Millan F, Telegrafi A, Drouot N, Rudolf G, Chelly J, Marks W, Burglen L, Demailly D, Coubes P, Castro-Jimenez M, Joriot S, Ghoumid J, Belin J, Faucheux JM, Blumkin L, Hull M, Parnes M, Ravelli C, Poulen G, Calmels N, Nemeth AH, Smith M, Barnicoat A, Ewenczyk C, Méneret A, Roze E, Keren B, Mignot C, Beroud C, Acosta F, Nowak C, Wilson WG, Steel D, Capuano A, Vidailhet M, Lin JP, Tranchant C, Cif L, Doummar D, Anheim M. Highlighting the dystonic phenotype related to GNAO1. Mov Disord. 2022a;37:1547-54. [PMC free article: PMC9545634] [PubMed: 35722775]

  • Wirth T, Garone G, Kurian MA, Piton A, Roze E, Lin JP, Tranchant C, Cif L, Doummar D, Anheim M. Reply to: "GNAO1 haploinsufficiency associated with a mild delayed-onset dystonia phenotype". Mov Disord. 2022b;37:2466-7. [PubMed: 36533587]

  • Wirth T, Tranchant C, Drouot N, Keren B, Mignot C, Cif L, Lefaucheur R, Lion-François L, Méneret A, Gras D, Roze E, Laroche C, Burbaud P, Bannier S, Lagha-Boukbiza O, Spitz MA, Laugel V, Bereau M, Ollivier E, Nitschke P, Doummar D, Rudolf G, Anheim M, Chelly J. Increased diagnostic yield in complex dystonia through exome sequencing. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020;74:50-6. [PubMed: 32334381]

  • Xiong J, Peng J, Duan HL, Chen C, Wang XL, Chen SM, Yin F. [Recurrent convulsion and pulmonary infection complicated by psychomotor retardation in an infant]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018;20:154-7. [PMC free article: PMC7389246] [PubMed: 29429466]

  • Yamamoto EA, Berry M, Harris W, Shahin MN, Wilson JL, Safarpour D, Raslan AM. Good response to deep brain stimulation in two forms of inherited chorea related to GNAO1 and neuroacanthocystosis with illustrative videos. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2021;9:401-3. [PMC free article: PMC8974841] [PubMed: 35402648]

  • Yamashita Y, Ogawa T, Ogaki K, Kamo H, Sukigara T, Kitahara E, Izawa N, Iwamuro H, Oyama G, Kamagata K, Hatano T, Umemura A, Kosaki R, Kubota M, Shimo Y, Hattori N. Neuroimaging evaluation and successful treatment by using directional deep brain stimulation and levodopa in a patient with GNAO1-associated movement disorder: a case report. J Neurol Sci. 2020;411:116710. [PubMed: 32044685]

  • Yang X, Niu X, Yang Y, Cheng M, Zhang J, Chen J, Yang Z, Zhang Y. Phenotypes of GNAO1 variants in a Chinese cohort. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021;12:662162. [PMC free article: PMC8193119] [PubMed: 34122306]

  • Yilmaz S, Turhan T, Ceylaner S, Gökben S, Tekgul H, Serdaroglu G. Excellent response to deep brain stimulation in a young girl with GNAO1-related progressive choreoathetosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32:1567-8. [PubMed: 27278281]

  • Zhu X, Petrovski S, Xie P, Ruzzo EK, Lu Y-F, McSweeney KM, Ben-Zeev B, Nissenkorn A, Anikster Y, Oz-Levi D, Dhindsa RS, Hitomi Y, Schoch K, Spillmann RC, Heimer G, Marek-Yagel D, Tzadok M, Han Y, Worley G, Goldstein J, Jiang Y-H, Lancet D, Pras E, Shashi V, McHale D, Need AC, Goldstein DB. Whole-exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic diseases: interpreting 119 trios. Genet Med. 2015;17:774-81. [PMC free article: PMC4791490] [PubMed: 25590979]