Table 11Pain relief in systematic reviews of acetaminophen compared with NSAID

Systematic ReviewDate of Last SearchNumber of Head-to-Head Trials IncludedMain Results for Outcome of General or Rest Pain
Towheed, 2006180Through 7/0512 (4 trials evaluated coxibs)NSAIDs superior for rest pain (3 trials, SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.36), overall pain (8 trials, SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.33), WOMAC pain (2 trials, SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.38), WOMAC stiffness (2 trials, SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.34), WOMAC function (2 trials, SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40), and global assessment of efficacy (2 trials, RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4)
Zhang, 2004182Through 7/038 (3 trials evaluated coxibs)NSAIDS superior using WOMAC scale (SMD 0.3, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44) and clinical response rate (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.41)
Lee, 2004179Through 2/036 (1 trial evaluated a coxib)NSAIDs superior for rest pain (weighted mean difference 6.33, 95% CI 3.41 to 9.24)
Wegman, 2004181Through 12/013 (no trials evaluated coxibs)NSAIDs superior for general/rest pain (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51)

CI = confidence interval; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; RR = relative risk; SMD = standardized mean difference; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

From: Results

Cover of Analgesics for Osteoarthritis
Analgesics for Osteoarthritis: An Update of the 2006 Comparative Effectiveness Review [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 38.
Chou R, McDonagh MS, Nakamoto E, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.