NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Bruening W, Schoelles K, Treadwell J, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Dec. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 19.)
Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions [Internet].
Show detailsTable E3. Previously published systematic reviews: design
Table E4. Previously published systematic reviews: quality rating
Table E5. Previously published systematic reviews: results
Table E6. Studies included to address Key Questions 1 and 2: design details
Table E7. Quality assessment instrument
Table E10. Patient inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies addressing Key Questions 1 and 2
Table E11. Characteristics of patients enrolled in studies addressing Key Questions 1 and 2
Table E12. Characteristics of the breast lesions in the studies addressing Key Questions 1 and 2
Table E13. Studies of the dissemination of cancerous cells during biopsy procedures
Table E14. Surgical procedures avoided
Table E15. Patient procedure preference
Table E17. Physician experience
Table E18. Procedure duration time
Table E19. Wait time for test results
Table E20. Availability of a qualified pathologist
- Evidence Tables - Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Bio...Evidence Tables - Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...