U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from GEO DataSets

Items: 20

1.

Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity

(Submitter supplied) Genomic analyses often involve scanning for potential transcription-factor (TF) binding sites using models of the sequence specificity of DNA binding proteins. Many approaches have been developed to model and learn a protein’s binding specificity by representing sequence motifs, including the gaps and dependencies between binding-site residues, but these methods have not been systematically compared. more...
Organism:
synthetic construct
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL11260
172 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE42864
ID:
200042864
2.

Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights

(Submitter supplied) Transcription factors (TFs) play a central role in regulating gene expression by interacting with cis regulatory DNA elements associated with their target genes. Recent surveys have examined the DNA binding specificities of most Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factors but a comprehensive evaluation of their data has been lacking. Results: We analyzed in vitro and in vivo TF-DNA binding data reported in previous large-scale studies to generate a comprehensive, curated resource of DNA binding specificity data for all characterized S. more...
Organism:
synthetic construct; Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL6796
27 Samples
Download data
Series
Accession:
GSE34306
ID:
200034306
3.

Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape

(Submitter supplied) The SELEX-seq platform was used to generate DNA-binding affinity predictions for the human Max transcription factor. This experiment was performed as part of a cross-validation study comparing the accuracy of DNA shape-augmented TF binding specificity models across two different platforms (SELEX-seq and gcPBM)
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing
Platform:
GPL16791
1 Sample
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE60200
ID:
200060200
4.

Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape

(Submitter supplied) Accurate predictions of the DNA binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) are necessary for understanding gene regulatory mechanisms. Traditionally, predictive models are built based on nucleotide sequence features. Here, we employed three- dimensional DNA shape information obtained on a high-throughput basis to integrate intuitive DNA structural features into the modeling of TF binding specificities using support vector regression. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL17173
3 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE59845
ID:
200059845
5.

Stability selection for regression-based models of transcription factor-DNA binding specificity

(Submitter supplied) Motivation: The DNA binding specificity of a transcription factor (TF) is typically represented using a position weight matrix (PWM) model, which implicitly assumes that individual bases in a TF binding site contribute independently to the binding affinity, an assumption that does not always hold. For this reason, more complex models of binding specificity have been developed. However, these models have their own caveats: they typically have a large number of parameters, which makes them hard to learn and interpret. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL17173
4 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE47026
ID:
200047026
6.

High-Resolution DNA Binding Specificity Analysis of Yeast Transcription Factors

(Submitter supplied) We used microarrays to detail the global program of gene expression underlying rRNA processing gene regulation during heat shock. PBF1 is YBL054W (TOD6) and PBF2 is YER088C (DOT6).
Organism:
Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Type:
Expression profiling by array
Platform:
GPL2529
24 Samples
Download data: CEL, TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE13684
ID:
200013684
7.

Protein−DNA binding in the absence of specific base-pair recognition

(Submitter supplied) Until now, it has been reasonably assumed that specific base-pair recognition is the only mechanism controlling the specificity of transcription factor (TF)−DNA binding. Contrary to this assumption, here we show that nonspecific DNA sequences possessing certain repeat symmetries, when present outside of specific TF binding sites (TFBSs), statistically control TF−DNA binding preferences. We used high-throughput protein−DNA binding assays to measure the binding levels and free energies of binding for several human TFs to tens of thousands of short DNA sequences with varying re- peat symmetries. more...
Organism:
synthetic construct; Homo sapiens
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL19252
4 Samples
Download data: GPR, TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE61920
ID:
200061920
8.

Current DNA motif models can lead to incorrect hypotheses about the genomic recruitment of transcription factors

(Submitter supplied) The E2F family of transcription factors is typically described as binding the family consensus sequence TTTSSCGC, were S is G or C. Analysis of ChIP-seq experiments, however, reveals that this consensus sequence is found in only 10% of ChIP-seq peaks, suggesting that the mechanism for E2F sequence recognition cannot be explained using previous assumptions. In order to better understand E2F sequence specificity, we performed high-throughput Universal Protein Binding Microarray experiments to obtain the relative binding affinity for every possible 8-mer, as well a large number of bound and unbound probes intheir native genomic sequence context. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens; synthetic construct
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL19244
3 Samples
Download data: GPR, TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE61854
ID:
200061854
9.

DynaMO, a package identifying transcription factor binding sites in dynamical ChIPSeq/RNASeq datasets, identifies transcription factors driving yeast ultradian and mammalian circadian cycles

(Submitter supplied) Biological processes are usually associated with genome-wide remodeling of transcription driven by transcription factors (TFs). Identifying key TFs and their spatiotemporal binding patterns are indispensable to understanding how dynamic processes are programmed. We present a computational method, dynamic motif occupancy (DynaMO), which exploits random forest modeling and clustering based enrichment analysis. more...
Organism:
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Type:
Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing; Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing
Platform:
GPL17342
30 Samples
Download data: FPKM_TRACKING, TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE72263
ID:
200072263
10.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_Runx1Runx2]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL23935
2 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE117350
ID:
200117350
11.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_E2f1E2f3E2f]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL23935
3 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE117349
ID:
200117349
12.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_Elk1Ets1Gabpa]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL23935
3 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE117348
ID:
200117348
13.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_Elk1Ets1Gabpa_MycMaxMad]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL23935
3 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE102810
ID:
200102810
14.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_E2F1-3-4_cust2_v1]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens; synthetic construct
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL19244
5 Samples
Download data: TXT, XLSX
Series
Accession:
GSE97886
ID:
200097886
15.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_MycMaxMad_v1]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL17173
4 Samples
Download data: TXT, XLSX
Series
Accession:
GSE97885
ID:
200097885
16.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding

(Submitter supplied) This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
Organism:
synthetic construct; Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
5 related Platforms
28 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE97794
ID:
200097794
17.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_Elk1Ets1Gabpa_v1]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL23305
4 Samples
Download data: TXT, XLSX
Series
Accession:
GSE97793
ID:
200097793
18.

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_Runx1Runx2_v1]

(Submitter supplied) Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Platform:
GPL23293
4 Samples
Download data: TXT, XLSX
Series
Accession:
GSE97691
ID:
200097691
19.

Identification of Breast Cancer Associated Variants That Modulate Transcription Factor Binding

(Submitter supplied) GWAS have discovered thousands of genomic loci that are associated with disease risk and quantitative traits, but most of the variants responsible for risk remain uncharacterized. The vast majority of GWAS-identified loci contain non-coding SNPs and defining molecular mechanism of risk is challenging. Many non-coding causal SNPs are hypothesized to alter Transcription Factor (TF) binding sites as the mechanism by which they affect organismal phenotypes. more...
Organism:
Homo sapiens
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL18573
5 Samples
Download data: BED, BEDGRAPH, BIGWIG
Series
Accession:
GSE89013
ID:
200089013
20.

Similarity Regression predicts evolution of transcription factor sequence specificity

(Submitter supplied) Transcription factor (TF) binding specificities (motifs) are essential to the analysis of noncoding DNA and gene regulation. Accurate prediction of TF sequence specificities is critical, because the hundreds of sequenced eukaryotic genomes encompass hundreds of thousands of TFs, and assaying each is currently infeasible. There is ongoing controversy regarding the efficacy of motif prediction methods, as well as the degree of motif diversification among related species. more...
Organism:
synthetic construct
Type:
Other
Platform:
GPL11260
682 Samples
Download data: TXT
Series
Accession:
GSE121420
ID:
200121420
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

db=gds|term=|query=1|qty=5|blobid=MCID_6688397549fc8a2325345add|ismultiple=true|min_list=5|max_list=20|def_tree=20|def_list=|def_view=|url=/Taxonomy/backend/subset.cgi?|trace_url=/stat?
   Taxonomic Groups  [List]
Tree placeholder
    Top Organisms  [Tree]

Find related data

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center