U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Age-related macular degeneration: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2018 Jan. (NICE Guideline, No. 82.)

Cover of Age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration: diagnosis and management.

Show details

Appendix HGRADE tables and meta-analysis results

H.1. Classification

H.1.1. Classification systems for age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

RQ6: What effective classification tool should be used to inform people with AMD?

Download PDF (429K)

H.2. Risk factors

H.2.1. Risk factors for development or progression of AMD

RQ2: What risk factors increase the likelihood of a person developing AMD or progressing to late AMD?

Download PDF (254K)

H.2.1.1. Development of early AMD in people at risk: risk outcomes for developing early AMD

Download PDF (370K)

H.2.1.2. Development of geographic atrophy (GA) in people due to AMD: risk outcomes for developing GA

Download PDF (435K)

H.2.1.3. Development of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) due to AMD: risk outcomes for developing CNV

Download PDF (430K)

H.2.1.4. Development of late AMD in people at risk: risk outcomes for developing any late AMD (GA or CNV)

Download PDF (653K)

H.2.1. Strategies to slow the progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

RQ7: What is the effectiveness of strategies to reduce the risk of developing AMD in the unaffected eye or slow the progression of AMD?

The GRADE tables in this section were produced as part of a collaboration between by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision group and the NICE Internal Clinical Guidelines Team.

Download PDF (504K)

H.3. Diagnosis

H.3.1. Signs and symptoms of AMD

RQ1: What signs and symptoms should prompt a healthcare professional to suspect AMD in people presenting to healthcare services?

Download PDF (214K)

H.3.2. Tools for triage, diagnosis and informed treatment

Review question

RQ4: What tools are useful for triage, diagnosis, informing treatment and determining management in people with suspected AMD?

Download PDF (439K)

H.4. Referral

H.4.1. Organisational models and referral pathways for triage, diagnosis, ongoing treatment and follow-up of people with suspected and confirmed age-related macular degeneration

RQ5: How do different organisational models and referral pathways for triage, diagnosis, ongoing treatment and follow up influence outcomes for people with suspected AMD (for example correct diagnosis, errors in diagnosis, delays in diagnosis, process outcomes)?

RQ16: How do different organisational models for ongoing treatment and follow up influence outcomes for people with diagnosed neovascular AMD (for example disease progression, time to treatment, non-attendance)?

RQ24: How soon should people with neovascular AMD be diagnosed and treated after becoming symptomatic?

Download PDF (424K)

H.5. Non-pharmacological management

H.5.1. Psychological therapies

RQ8: What is the effectiveness of psychological therapies for AMD?

Download PDF (336K)

H.5.2. The effectiveness of support strategies for people with impairment and age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

RQ9: What is the effectiveness of support strategies for people with visual impairment and AMD (for example reablement services and strategies for optimising existing visual performance)?

Download PDF (307K)

H.6. Pharmacological management

H.6.1. Anti-angiogenic therapies and frequency of administration

RQ12: What is the effectiveness of different anti-angiogenic therapies (including photodynamic therapy) for the treatment of late age-related macular degeneration (wet active)?

RQ18: What is the effectiveness of different frequencies of administration of antiangiogenic therapies for the treatment of late age-related macular degeneration (wet active)?

The GRADE tables for pairwise meta-analyses in this section were produced by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision group, as part of a collaboration with the NICE Internal Clinical Guidelines Team.

H.6.1.1. Photodynamic therapy versus placebo

Download PDF (560K)

H.6.1.2. Bevacizumab vs control

Download PDF (405K)

H.6.1.3. Ranibizumab vs control (sham injection or PDT)

Download PDF (564K)

H.6.1.4. Bevacizumab vs ranibizumab

Download PDF (512K)

H.6.1.5. Aflibercept vs ranibizumab

Download PDF (649K)

H.6.1.6. Treatment frequency: PRN vs routine injection

Download PDF (244K)

H.6.1.7. Treatment frequency: ≤6 weeks vs >6 weeks treatment intervals

Download PDF (228K)

H.6.1.8. Treatment frequency: PRN loading

Download PDF (188K)

H.6.1.9. Treatment frequency: treat-and-extend vs routine month injection

Download PDF (228K)

H.6.1.10. Treatment frequency: PRN-and-extend vs PRN

Download PDF (298K)

H.6.2. Treatment in people presenting with visual acuity better than 6/12 or people presenting with visual acuity worse than 6/96

RQ10: What is the effectiveness of treatment of neovascular AMD in people presenting with visual acuity better than 6/12?

RQ25: What is the effectiveness of treatment of neovascular AMD in people presenting with visual acuity worse than 6/96?

Download PDF (253K)

H.6.3. Adjunctive therapies

RQ13: What is the effectiveness of adjunctive therapies for the treatment of late AMD (wet active)?

H.6.3.1. Anti-VEGF +PDT vs anti-VEGF

Download PDF (345K)

H.6.3.2. Anti-VEGF + steroids vs anti-VEGF

Download PDF (197K)

H.6.3.3. Anti-VEGF +PDT vs anti-VEGF steroid + PDT

Download PDF (158K)

H.6.4. Switching and stopping antiangiogenic treatment for late AMD (wet)

RQ11: What are the indicators for treatment failing and switching?

RQ14: What factors indicate that treatment for neovascular AMD should be stopped?

RQ15: What is the effectiveness of switching therapies for neovascular AMD if the first-line therapy is contraindicated or has failed?

This review was undertaken by the National Clinical Guideline team.

H.6.4.1. The effectiveness of switching therapies

Download PDF (398K)

H.7. Monitoring

H.7.1. Frequency of monitoring

RQ19: How often should people with early age-related macular degeneration (AMD), indeterminate AMD, or advanced geographic atrophy be reviewed?

RQ20: How often should people with early AMD, indeterminate AMD, or advanced geographic atrophy have their non-affected eye reviewed?

RQ21: In people with neovascular AMD who are not being actively treated, how often should they be reviewed?

RQ22: How often should people with neovascular AMD have their non-affected eye reviewed?

No evidence was found for these review questions.

H.7.2. Self monitoring

RQ23a: What strategies and tools are useful for self-monitoring for people with AMD?

Download PDF (172K)

H.7.3. Monitoring strategies and tools for people with late age-related macular degeneration (wet active)

RQ23b: What strategies and tools are useful for monitoring for people with late AMD (wet active)?

Download PDF (326K)

H.8. Information

H.8.1. Barriers and facilitators to appointment attendance and update of treatment for people with age-related macular degeneration

RQ17: What are the barriers and facilitators to appointment attendance and uptake of treatment for people with AMD?

Download PDF (364K)

H.8.2. Informational needs of people with suspected or confirmed AMD and their family members/carers

RQ3a: What information do people with suspected AMD and their family members or carers find useful, and in what format and when?

RQ3b: What information do people with confirmed AMD and their family members or carers find useful, and in what format and when?

Download PDF (224K)

Copyright © NICE 2018.
Bookshelf ID: NBK536457

Views

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...